Each day in the month of August we’ll be examining a different NHL team — from looking back at last season to discussing a player under pressure to identifying X-factors to asking questions about the future. Today we look at the Boston Bruins.
Let’s bat around three burning questions for the Bruins in 2019-20 …
1. Is the Atlantic Division going to be even tougher?
Consider some scenarios that could await the Bruins:
- The Lightning stand as a powerhouse again, and maybe avoid a playoff disaster this time around.
- For all the drama, the Maple Leafs remain potent, and perhaps find another gear with Tyson Barrie giving them more defensive balance.
- Sergei Bobrovsky stops pucks like one of the best goalies in the world, and Joel Quenneville brings together a Panthers team that already boasted considerable talent.
- A Canadiens team that was sneaky-good last season takes another step forward.
- The Sabres capitalize on a strong offseason and threaten for one of the top three seeds.
- The Senators and Red Wings seem likely to struggle, although Detroit could at least be scrappy.
While the Panthers and Habs could just as easily stumble, the top-end of the Atlantic figures to be robust once again. You almost wonder if the Bruins might prefer life as a wild-card team in the Metro bracket, if possible.
2. What will they get from their goalies?
The goaltending position is about as unpredictable as it is crucial to an NHL team’s success.
On paper, Tuukka Rask and Jaroslav Halak stand as one of the most dependable duos in the league. Both have shown the ability to put together elite, or near-elite stretches, as recently as 2018-19. If Rask falters or gets hurt, Halak’s been capable of stepping in and playing at a high level. Their career numbers are positively sparkling.
There is one thing “on paper” that’s troubling, though: their ages.
Rask is 32, and Halak is 34. It’s far from impossible for one, or both, to hit the aging curve hard, whether that comes down to suffering untimely injuries, athleticism or fatigue-related drops in play, or a combination of those factors.
I’d argue the Bruins are in a position to succeed goaltending-wise, but there are some red flags that things could also go wrong.
3. Will the Bruins’ offense be more versatile, or remain top-heavy?
Charlie Coyle‘s cold puck luck right after being traded to the Bruins made it seem like Boston would be as top-heavy as ever entering the 2019 Stanley Cup Playoffs. Coyle’s lot then turned red-hot for stretches there, allowing him to form a nice supporting duo with Marcus Johansson, and that was crucial during the rare lulls for the Bruins’ dominant top line of Brad Marchand, David Pastrnak, and Patrice Bergeron. Supporting players like Coyle, Jake DeBrusk, and Sean Kuraly picked up the slack during the 2019 Stanley Cup Final, as the Blues found ways to solve the Bruins’ top line.
As discussed in the x-factor post about the Bruins battling the aging curve, it’s possible that Bergeron (34) and Marchand (31) may both decline because of all of their mileage, and sometimes those drops are sudden and huge, rather than gradual.
In some cases, the Bruins’ top line might just suffer because of specific matchups, particularly during the playoffs, where a team like the Blues can break down tape and negate some of their strengths with comparable two-way players.
In other cases, like the dog days of the regular season, especially back-to-back sets, it might just be smarter for the Bruins to strategically choose nights to rest veterans like Bergeron.
Younger and/or supporting players can make that feasible if they show that they can handle bigger roles. That’s a pretty big “if,” though.