Skip navigation
Favorites
Sign up to follow your favorites on all your devices.
Sign up

After eye injuries, Bieksa and Hjalmarsson deflect visor questions

Niklas Hjalmarsson

Niklas Hjalmarsson

AP

On Tuesday, Vancouver d-man Kevin Bieksa returned from an eye injury -- suffered two nights earlier after he was struck by a puck -- and did so without wearing a protective visor.

When pressed, Bieksa wouldn’t expand on the reasons why.

“Whether I wear a visor or not is a personal and a family decision, so it’s not something I’m going to debate publicly,” he said, per The Province. “I’m not going to be the guy debating both sides of it, and I like to keep it to myself.”

Now, it’s Chicago’s Niklas Hjalmarsson dancing around the visor debate.

Hjalmarsson, who’s donned a visor in the past but primarily plays without, suffered a nasty cut under his left eye Saturday in Toronto (like Bieksa, he was caught in the face with the puck). Hjalmarsson returned to the game with stitches -- and a protective shield -- but was non-committal about wearing one moving forward.

“I’ve tried a couple of times before, guess we’ll see how it goes,” Hjalmarsson explained, per the Chicago Tribune. “I’ve made the mistake of taking it off right away when I could, and once you take it off it’s really tough to go back to [wearing a] visor.”

Hjalmarsson stuck with the visor in the wake of the Toronto incident, and wore one during Tuesday’s 5-0 win over the Habs in Montreal. But again, he wouldn’t commit to full-time use.

“It feels like you’re in a cage a little bit, even though you can see pretty well through it,” he explained. “It’s a different feeling to get used to for sure.”

The NHL implemented a mandatory visor rule for incoming players last season, but veterans like Bieksa and Hjalmarsson were grandfathered in -- meaning they were allowed to decide for themselves. It’s made for an interesting dynamic; rather than speak out in favor of going shield-less, the players have both seemed to downplay the “will you or won’t you?” angle, while pushing the “if I do, I do...if I don’t, I don’t” position.

The guys responsible for employing said players, though, have a decidedly different take on the matter.

Like Canucks GM Jim Benning, for example -- he didn’t wear a visor during his playing career, but thinks they’re vitally important now.

“The game has changed,” Benning said. “Pucks fly off sticks a lot harder than in the ’80s, and now the visor issue is a personal preference.

“I would like to see all our guys wear visors, but at the end of the day it’s up to them.”