Tag: Board of Governors meeting


Five things to wonder about realignment


Realignment talk is going to dominate NHL discussion today and tomorrow and with the latest proposal being leaked out and discussed, there’s a few things to keep in mind while the Board of Governors meet in Pebble Beach to figure out which direction the league heads in.

1. Rivalries

The playoffs always help make a rivalry real. The NHL adopted an unbalanced schedule to force rivalries to happen and while that’s been nice, it hasn’t paid off. Going back to a balanced schedule and a playoff format with the top four teams in each conference facing each other first in the first two rounds is the right way to make it happen. Old hate becomes new hate and new hate is good for business.

2. The Phoenix Situation

This could be the final year we see the Coyotes play in Glendale. Deciding on realignment without knowing where the Coyotes could land next is tricky. Elliotte Friedman reports that their next location could be any of Seattle, Quebec City, Kansas City, or Las Vegas. If they move to Seattle or Vegas, fine. Kansas City or Quebec could create headaches. The NHL better have a backup plan for where the Coyotes can switch to just in case.

3. Detroit and Columbus and Nashville and Dallas

These four teams all want their travel problems alleviated. Detroit and Columbus want to be with more easterly teams, Nashville wants something similar, while Dallas wants to be lumped in with the Central Division teams for travel purposes. If they’re going to do radical realignment, getting all of these teams what they want is difficult but there’s got to be compromise. Will the balanced schedule be enough?

4. Plan C is for “cop out”

If none of the radical proposals work out, the one move that will end up playing out is seeing Winnipeg swapped out with either Detroit or Columbus. If this is the one move that’s made, that’s a big failure for the Board of Governors. If selfish needs and petty desires get in the way of fixing things up, they should feel ashamed. They’ll also have to hear a lot from Columbus/Detroit and Dallas management at the very least. Who wants to listen to a cranky Mike Ilitch anyway?

5. Embrace being different

Fans seem to want things to be somewhat the same but just a little bit different. The NHL isn’t like the other major sports and should embrace being different. Hockey’s uniqueness makes it special. A four conference format? Have at it. Divisional/Conference playoffs to decide who goes to the NHL final four? Go for it, it worked in the 80s. Doing things old school is all the rage as it is, having the league embrace it would be beautiful.

Report: Realignment down to two Detroit-favorable solutions

Gary Bettman

One way or another, it looks like NHL realignment is going to work to the Red Wings’ benefit.

John Shannon of Sportsnet reports the league is down to two possible ways to realign the NHL and if you’ve kept up with the theories tossed out there, you’re familiar with what’s at the top of the list. Shannon reports one of the choices involves simply swapping Detroit and Winnipeg, putting the Jets in the Central Division and the Wings in the Southeast.

The other format would see the conferences and six divisions go away, instead having four divisions and a balanced schedule. With those two options on the table, it’ll be up to next week’s Board of Governors meeting to decide if radical realignment or a quick fix is what they’re after.

Of course, Gary Bettman has said a realignment decision might not be finalized next week, and with two-thirds of the owners needed to approve anything, this could drag out a bit longer.

Either way, it’s shaping up that Detroit will have its travel woes eased and Mike Ilitch won’t have to harass Bettman any more about his “promise” to move them East. Either Detroit will come East, or it’ll have the same travel problems every other team has.

Board of Governors meeting: Conditionally approve goal modifications, talk realignment

Gary Bettman

The NHL’s Board of Governors gathered to discuss a handful of things that could help the game out in the long run and to help the league get straightened out with their conference alignment.

The league got down to matters on some of the things tested out during the NHL’s R&D camp this summer that saw tactics implemented to help officials both on the ice and in the replay booth make sure that a goal is actually a goal. The green verification line that sits a puck-width behind the red goal line in the net as well as thin mesh on top of the goals and a clear plastic skirt around the bottom of the net have been conditionally approved by the Board of Governors. The board will wait for approval from the NHLPA before going fully ahead with putting these new changes in place for this season.

As for changing the depth of the nets themselves, like the shallower nets used last night in Toronto, that will take approval from the competition committee to make that happen and should that be approved, it won’t happen until next season.

The bigger thing on the Board’s plate today, however, was discussion of realignment starting next season. The talk of realignment came up during the summer and much of that is in part thanks to the Thrashers moving to Winnipeg and adding another team to the west while three eastern located teams continue to play in the Western Conference. Detroit, Columbus, and Nashville are all seeking to find a way to the Eastern Conference next season and Wild owner Craig Leipold even may have tipped off what the NHL’s plans are to do it.

With the Board talking things over today, the clock is officially ticking until when we’ll see what the league comes up with as their solution to trying to keep everyone happy. Dan Rosen of NHL.com has the discussion.

It’s possible that the Board of Governors will discuss changing the structure of the conferences by creating four divisions of seven or eight teams. Columbus, Nashville and Detroit have reportedly expressed an interest in moving to the Eastern Conference.

Going back to a four division alignment would be another “turn back the clock” element by the NHL as that’s the setup the league had before switching to six divisions. The four division format also had the excitement of divisional playoffs with the top four teams in each division making the postseason and then squaring off against each other in the first two rounds of the playoffs. In those days, the schedule was also balanced and not overloaded with games against teams in the division. Rivalries were built in the post season between teams that already hated each other. It was truly a beautiful thing.

Should all these things make a comeback, the NHL doing things “old school” like this would help spice things up in the postseason as well as not burn fans out having so many regular season games between divisional foes. Of course, the NHL could decide to keep doing the playoffs just as they are now with division winners taking the top two spots and everyone else duking it out for the other six spots.

The NHL has to make a move on realignment before December so as to get the schedule in order for next season. If nothing can be agreed upon by then, any plans to realign would likely get tabled for another season. Don’t expect there to be any problems in getting something worked out however.

Ottawa Senators hope to trade for a gritty defenseman like Vancouver’s Kevin Bieksa


As we mentioned when discussing the latest round of Brad Richards trade rumors, the Board of Governors meetings are coming up on Monday and Tuesday in Florida so the gossip is starting to gear up a bit today.

One team that might look to tweak its roster are the mediocre but occasionally promising Ottawa Senators. At the moment, Ottawa is stuck outside the Eastern Conference playoff picture. They’re in a cluster with the Carolina Hurricanes and Buffalo Sabres for ninth place, which is promising until you realize the fact that the eight place team is between six and seven points ahead of that bubble group.

Since improving the overall talent level seems like a bit of a stretch at this point, the Senators would instead like to achieve the more reasonable goal of improving their toughness on the blueline.

The Ottawa Sun’s Bruce Garrioch reports that GM Bryan Murray might look to trade for Canucks defenseman Kevin Bieksa to accomplish that.

Vancouver GM Mike Gillis has been trying to deal D Kevin Bieksa for a while (insert denial here) and will sooner or later.

However, the Canucks are being targeted by a lot of teams looking for blue-line help.

They’ve got both Bieksa (making $3.5 million US), who’s set to become an unrestricted free agent on July 1 and D Keith Ballard ($4.2 million), who has been a healthy scratch at various times this season.

Bieksa would be a better fit in Ottawa and the Senators have liked him for a long time.

“He’s got grit and he’d make it a little tougher for guys around the net. He’s dirty and that’s the kind of player Ottawa needs,” said the executive. “The Canucks are going for a Stanley Cup this year, they have to make sure Sami Salo is on track to return.”

Naturally, we’ll keep you abreast of the scuttlebutt, even if it ends up being more about general managers flirting with ideas than actually accomplishing anything tangible.