Phoenix Coyotes v Calgary Flames

Coyotes bring back Moss, after all


David Moss won’t be leaving the Arizona Coyotes for Switzerland, after all. What looked like a two-year overseas deal had a one-week NHL out clause, which apparently expedited the process to get him re-signed with the Coyotes, who locked him up for the 2014-15 season.

The Coyotes didn’t disclose his financial terms, but his last deal with the team was for two years and $4.2 million. Update: the deal might be a significant pay cut down to $800K, according to the Arizona Republic’s Sarah McLellan. If so, that’s a nice value for Arizona.

While he doesn’t exactly inspire a ton of excitement, Coyotes blog Five for Howling details why the 32-year-old is fairly useful and could be primed for a slight boost in production next season:

Was Moss not productive, or was he simply unlucky? The advanced stats actually like Moss’ game, as he has been a positive player in both Corsi for and Fenwick for in both of seasons in the Valley. In both of his seasons as a Coyote, the team was more likely to score when he was on the ice than not, although for 2014 it was only a .3% difference, so it was almost negligible. He also has had some trouble finishing as he had a shooting percentage of 6.1% last year and a staggeringly bad 5.3% this season. How bad is 5.3%? Only 12 other NHL forwards had at least 100 shots on goal this season and had a worse success rate than Moss, and of those 12 only 1, Thomas Fleischmann of Florida, attempted more shots than Moss’ 151 (188). That’s really tough, and one shouldn’t expect another dismal season like that again, right? Not so fast, as Moss’ PDO was actually 100.5, and the league normal rate is 100. So he wasn’t incredibly unlucky in a statistical sense.

So, long story short, Moss is probably best described as “solid if easily replaceable.” Considering all the turnover this offseason, it might be nice to keep what seems like a solid depth guy around, though.

Dropping like flies: Johnson, Killorn hurt in Bolts’ exhibition

Montreal Canadiens v Tampa Bay Lightning - Game One
Leave a comment

You probably know the drill: injury updates are murky in the NHL basically from the moment a puck drops.

We’ll learn more once the 2015-16 season begins, but at the moment, Saturday might have served as a costly night for the Tampa Bay Lightning. Both Tyler Johnson and Alex Killorn went down with injuries stemming from a 3-2 pre-season win against the Florida Panthers.

“Guys were dropping like flies,” Steven Stamkos told the Tamba Bay Times.

These could be minor situations – just about any ailment will sideline a key asset this time of year – yet one cannot help but wonder if the Lightning might limp into this campaign.

Nikita Kucherov is dealing with his own issues, so that means at least minor issues for one half of the Bolts’ top six forwards.

It’s believed that more will be known about these banged-up Bolts sometime on Sunday.

Raffi Torres gets match penalty for being Raffi Torres

Raffi Torres

With knee issues still limiting him, Raffi Torres isn’t as mobile as he once was. Apparently he still moves well enough to leave the usual path of destruction.

It’s the pre-season, so it’s unclear if we’ll get a good look at the check, but Torres received a match penalty for his hit on Anaheim Ducks forward Jakob Silfverberg.

Most accounts were pretty critical of the San Jose Sharks’ chief troublemaker:

It’s too early to tell if Silfverberg is injured. If he is, that’s a significant loss for the Ducks, as he really showed signs of fulfilling his promise (especially during the 2015 playoffs).

As far as Torres goes, he’s hoping to play in the Sharks’ season-opener. Wherever he ends up, he’ll certainly make plenty of enemies on the ice.

Whether it was because of that hit or just the general distaste shared by those sides, it sounds like tonight’s Sharks – Ducks exhibition is getting ugly, in general:

This post will be updated if video of the hit becomes available, and also if we get a better idea of Silfverberg’s condition.

Update: Bullet dodged?