Michal Handzus #26 of the Chicago Blackhawks moves the puck against Tuomo Ruutu #15 of the Carolina Hurricanes during play at PNC Arena on October 15, 2013 in Raleigh, North Carolina. The Blackhawks defeated the Hurricanes 3-2 in an overtime shootout.
(October 14, 2013 - Source: Grant Halverson/Getty Images North America)

Blackhawks’ Handzus (upper body) gone for ‘a little bit’

Chicago Blackhawks coach Joel Quenneville revealed today that the team will be without forward Michal Handzus for “a little bit,” reports CSN’s Tracey Myers.

Handzus was acquired from the San Jose Sharks in April and ended up playing a significant role in the Blackhawks’ Stanley Cup-winning playoff run. That encouraged them to ink him to a one-year, $1 million contract for the 2013-14 campaign.

The 36-year-old forward has three points in nine games this season while averaging 13:18 minutes per contest. Brad Mills, 30, will replace him on Saturday, according to the Chicago Tribune’s Chris Kuc.

Mills should get some playing time in penalty-killing situations, which has been a weakness of Chicago’s this season. Michael Frolik was the team’s leading forward when it came to killing penalties last season and he’s a member of the Winnipeg Jets now.

For Mills, this will be his first game with the Chicago Blackhawks and just his 32nd career NHL contest.

In addition to that, Quenneville will scratch Ben Smith tonight so that 22-year-old forward Jeremy Morin can make his season debut.

Report: Torres won’t appeal 41-game suspension

Leave a comment

Sounds like Raffi Torres is accepting his punishment.

Per Sportsnet, Torres won’t appeal his 41-game suspension for an illegal hit to the head of Anaheim’s Jakob Silfverberg.

The report comes just days after the NHL’s Department of Player Safety levied one of the longest disciplinary rulings in league history, citing both the severity of the Silfverberg hit and Torres’ lengthy history of suspensions, fines and warnings.

There was some thought, however, that Torres would try to challenge the ruling.


He does have a history of success in that department. In 2012,Torres successfully appealed his suspension for a headshot on Chicago’s Marian Hossa, and had his punishment reduced from 25 games to 21.

Torres also isn’t considered a “repeat offender” under the current collective bargaining agreement, as his last suspension came in 2013.

Of course, part of that clean record is due to the fact he hasn’t played much. Torres has largely been sidelined by injury for the last two seasons, missing all of last year with knee problems.

Sportsnet’s Elliotte Friedman delved further into the repeat offender thing in his latest 30 Thoughts column:

If you read the relevant sections of the CBA, the league takes the position that the repeat offender status is only applicable to fines. Repeaters are fined on a per-game basis, non-repeaters on a per-day basis. (The former is more expensive, because there are fewer games than days in an NHL season.) However, if you go to Section 18.2, among the factors taken into account are, “the status of the offender and, specifically, whether the Player has a history of being subject to Supplementary Discipline for On-Ice Conduct.”

So, in the NHL’s view, a player’s history is relevant, even if longer than 18 months ago.

Should the report prove accurate and Torres doesn’t appeal, he will be eligible to return to action on Jan. 14, when the Sharks take on the Oilers.

Report: Kings, Richards nearing settlement

Mike Richards
1 Comment

The Los Angeles Kings and Mike Richards may be nearing a settlement in their dispute over Richards’ terminated contract, TSN’s Bob McKenzie is reporting.

You can read the report for all the details, but we’re sure curious about this part:

If a settlement is reached, there’s no word yet on what salary cap penalties the Kings would still face. There’s bound to be something, but not likely as onerous as the full value of Richards’ contract, which carries with it a cap hit of $5.75 million. If there’s a settlement, Richards would undoubtedly become a free agent though there’s no telling at this point what monies he would be entitled to from the Kings in a settlement.

The issue here is precedent, and what this case could set. The NHL and NHLPA can’t allow teams to escape onerous contracts through a back door, and many are adamant that that’s what the Kings were attempting to do in Richards’ case.