Daniel Alfredsson

Sens owner: We couldn’t meet Alfredsson’s demands


It’s Anaheim Ducks day on PHT, so it seems appropriate to talk about Daniel Alfredsson.

That link might sound like a stretch, given that Alfredsson never has and almost certainly never will play for the Ducks. But if you thought Alfredsson’s departure and Ottawa’s acquisition of Bobby Ryan from the Ducks were two unrelated events, Senators owner Eugene Melnyk recently suggested otherwise.

Melnyk told the Ottawa Citizen that Alfredsson came to the Senators with both salary demands and desire for Ottawa to add more talent.

“You can’t have it both ways and say, ‘Well I want this for me, but I want you to do this with me and the team.’ It’s ‘which one do you want?’” Melnyk said.

With that in mind, Melnyk informed Senators GM Bryan Murray that the team would not agree to Alfredsson’s contract demands and also promise to acquire new players. It sounds like the choice was Alfredsson’s and the team would have given him a “blank cheque” if he would accept the impact that would have on the Senators’ summer plans.

“To come up with the kind of money they were talking about and being fiscally responsible and ensuring the ongoing success of the organization, we knew we needed to add a Bobby Ryan-type player,” Melnyk explained. “And at the end, when I said blank cheque, that would have meant we would not have gotten the (Bobby Ryan-type player). Couldn’t afford it. Just couldn’t do it.”

Alfredsson responded by signing a one-year deal with the Detroit Red Wings that comes with a base salary of $3.5 million and could balloon to $5.5 million if he meets the requirements for his bonuses. He made it clear that his decision to leave Ottawa reflects his desire to win the Stanley Cup.

The Senators then responded with the Bobby Ryan trade that sent Jakob Silfverberg, Stefan Noesen, and a 2014 first-round pick to Anaheim.

It’s worth adding that Ottawa is operating well below the salary cap, so from that perspective they could have easily handled both Alfredsson’s contract and Ryan’s. However, Melnyk insists that it is necessary for the team to maintain a budget of around $50 million as opposed to the $64.3 million cap hit.

“We’re not the New York Rangers, we’re not the Toronto Maple Leafs, and I’m trying to keep ticket prices reasonable, because there’s a very delicate balance between ticket pricing, attendance and being able to put a competitive team (on the ice).”

They’re also not like the Detroit Red Wings, it seems, which have spent to the cap for the 2013-14 campaign.

Sens demote former first-rounder Puempel

Matt Puempel
Leave a comment

Looks like Matt Puempel won’t be making the leap after all.

Puempel, the subject of Ottawa’s “looking to make the leap” profile during our Team of the Day series, has been sent down to AHL Binghamton one day prior to the Sens’ opener against Buffalo.

Puempel, taken by Ottawa in the first round (24th overall) at the ’11 draft, made his big-league debut last season and looked as though he’d stick around — only to suffer a high ankle sprain after 13 games, and miss the rest of the season.

The 22-year-old came into this year’s camp looking to secure a full-time position at the big league level, but was beaten out by Shane Prince for the final forward spot on the roster.

To be fair, contract status probably played a role. Prince would’ve had to clear waivers to get down to Bingo, whereas Puempel didn’t.

A former 30-goal scorer in the American League, Puempel is expected to get another look with Ottawa this season.

Report: Torres won’t appeal 41-game suspension


Sounds like Raffi Torres is accepting his punishment.

Per Sportsnet, Torres won’t appeal his 41-game suspension for an illegal hit to the head of Anaheim’s Jakob Silfverberg.

The report comes just days after the NHL’s Department of Player Safety levied one of the longest disciplinary rulings in league history, citing both the severity of the Silfverberg hit and Torres’ lengthy history of suspensions, fines and warnings.

There was some thought, however, that Torres would try to challenge the ruling.


He does have a history of success in that department. In 2012,Torres successfully appealed his suspension for a headshot on Chicago’s Marian Hossa, and had his punishment reduced from 25 games to 21.

Torres also isn’t considered a “repeat offender” under the current collective bargaining agreement, as his last suspension came in 2013.

Of course, part of that clean record is due to the fact he hasn’t played much. Torres has largely been sidelined by injury for the last two seasons, missing all of last year with knee problems.

Sportsnet’s Elliotte Friedman delved further into the repeat offender thing in his latest 30 Thoughts column:

If you read the relevant sections of the CBA, the league takes the position that the repeat offender status is only applicable to fines. Repeaters are fined on a per-game basis, non-repeaters on a per-day basis. (The former is more expensive, because there are fewer games than days in an NHL season.) However, if you go to Section 18.2, among the factors taken into account are, “the status of the offender and, specifically, whether the Player has a history of being subject to Supplementary Discipline for On-Ice Conduct.”

So, in the NHL’s view, a player’s history is relevant, even if longer than 18 months ago.

Should the report prove accurate and Torres doesn’t appeal, he will be eligible to return to action on Jan. 14, when the Sharks take on the Oilers.