2012 NHL Stanley Cup Final – Game Six

Martin Brodeur: “I’m really happy to hopefully continue”


By most accounts, it seemed like Martin Brodeur more-or-less decided that this wouldn’t be his final season in the NHL.

While the future Hall of Famer didn’t totally shut the door on a possible retirement, he did shed some light on his situation after Game 6’s 6-1 defeat – and justified expectations that he’ll probably be back.

“This season and this playoff run answered a lot of questions – where my game is at – and I’m really happy to hopefully continue,” Brodeur said.

Katie Strang reports that Brodeur “wants to play, but wants some time to decide,” but he’ll make that call by July 1 (the beginning of the free agent period). Brodeur also said that his choice “is not linked” to Zach Parise’s free agent situation, although he believes that bringing back Parise is justifiably the Devils’ top priority.

Improved leverage

Going into the playoffs, it seemed like the Devils’ two most prominent off-season storylines revolved around one franchise staple they needed to woo (Parise) and one who seemingly needed to woo them (Brodeur). Many believed that Brodeur’s best days were behind him – some even wondered if Johan Hedberg was the best choice in net – yet he earned a significant amount of leverage with an outstanding playoff run.

More magic

Brodeur’s 2012 playoff numbers require zero “for his age” qualifiers. After a pedestrian regular season, Brodeur went 14-12 with a .917 save percentage and 2.12 GAA. Those stats don’t tower over Conn Smythe winner Jonathan Quick’s staggering marks, yet it’s not a stretch to say that Brodeur got the best of Quick at least a couple times.

To some, that kind of productivity represents a dignified time to “ride off into the sunset,” but Brodeur seems like he’s still having fun and might have something left in the tank. After this run, can you really fault him for wanting another spin?

Sens demote former first-rounder Puempel

Matt Puempel
Leave a comment

Looks like Matt Puempel won’t be making the leap after all.

Puempel, the subject of Ottawa’s “looking to make the leap” profile during our Team of the Day series, has been sent down to AHL Binghamton one day prior to the Sens’ opener against Buffalo.

Puempel, taken by Ottawa in the first round (24th overall) at the ’11 draft, made his big-league debut last season and looked as though he’d stick around — only to suffer a high ankle sprain after 13 games, and miss the rest of the season.

The 22-year-old came into this year’s camp looking to secure a full-time position at the big league level, but was beaten out by Shane Prince for the final forward spot on the roster.

To be fair, contract status probably played a role. Prince would’ve had to clear waivers to get down to Bingo, whereas Puempel didn’t.

A former 30-goal scorer in the American League, Puempel is expected to get another look with Ottawa this season.

Report: Torres won’t appeal 41-game suspension


Sounds like Raffi Torres is accepting his punishment.

Per Sportsnet, Torres won’t appeal his 41-game suspension for an illegal hit to the head of Anaheim’s Jakob Silfverberg.

The report comes just days after the NHL’s Department of Player Safety levied one of the longest disciplinary rulings in league history, citing both the severity of the Silfverberg hit and Torres’ lengthy history of suspensions, fines and warnings.

There was some thought, however, that Torres would try to challenge the ruling.


He does have a history of success in that department. In 2012,Torres successfully appealed his suspension for a headshot on Chicago’s Marian Hossa, and had his punishment reduced from 25 games to 21.

Torres also isn’t considered a “repeat offender” under the current collective bargaining agreement, as his last suspension came in 2013.

Of course, part of that clean record is due to the fact he hasn’t played much. Torres has largely been sidelined by injury for the last two seasons, missing all of last year with knee problems.

Sportsnet’s Elliotte Friedman delved further into the repeat offender thing in his latest 30 Thoughts column:

If you read the relevant sections of the CBA, the league takes the position that the repeat offender status is only applicable to fines. Repeaters are fined on a per-game basis, non-repeaters on a per-day basis. (The former is more expensive, because there are fewer games than days in an NHL season.) However, if you go to Section 18.2, among the factors taken into account are, “the status of the offender and, specifically, whether the Player has a history of being subject to Supplementary Discipline for On-Ice Conduct.”

So, in the NHL’s view, a player’s history is relevant, even if longer than 18 months ago.

Should the report prove accurate and Torres doesn’t appeal, he will be eligible to return to action on Jan. 14, when the Sharks take on the Oilers.