St Louis Blues v Washington Capitals

Capitals lack a clear No. 1 goalie


Going into this season, if you forced me to pick any team’s goalie duo – factoring in skill and cap hits* – I might just have chosen Tomas Vokoun and Michal Neuvirth. Of course, not much has gone as expected in Washington this season – and that cost-effective pairing hasn’t been excluded from the disappointment.’s Chuck Gormley asks a tough question, then: do the Capitals really have a No.1 goalie?

The current situation doesn’t it lend itself to an easy answer. Michal Neuvirth is scheduled to make his fourth start in a row tomorrow, so he’s carrying the torch right now. Vokoun’s crisis of confidence doesn’t help, either.

Still, Vokoun’s individual stats are better than Neuvy’s numbers and he certainly has the thicker resume. There are other goalie “situations” in the league, but there are a few things that make this one a little different:

source: AP1. Future vs. Now: When you look at battles such as Curtis Sanford vs. Steve Mason and Brian Elliott vs. Jaroslav Halak, they’re fights between should-be franchise youngsters and scrappy veterans trying to keep a job in the NHL. The scenario is different in Washington, as Vokoun is a should-be veteran starter while Neuvirth is the backup fighting for the No. 1 spot.

2. Contracts: While Mason and Halak are getting paid more and for longer, Vokoun only has a one-year deal while Neuvirth isn’t making much less and has an extra season in writing. In other words, there’s little to no price tag pressure to force the Capitals to throw Vokoun out there.


So what does it all mean? I’d say that the Capitals’ top job is fair game, which is a viewpoint backed up by Dale Hunter’s comments. Still, I’d say that – at this point in their careers – Vokoun is likely to produce better results. Perhaps sitting on the sidelines will allow him to get out of his head a little bit and rebound to the form that made him a nerdy blogger’s delight for so many years in Florida and Nashville.

* – Vokoun’s cap hit is $1.5 million and Neuvirth’s is $1.15 million. Only the Los Angeles Kings’ duo of Jonathan Quick ($1.8 million) and Jonathan Bernier ($1.25 million) is anywhere close in the “bang for buck” category. Or, maybe I should say, the expected bang for buck category.

Kings GM says Mike Richards went into ‘a destructive spiral’

Mike Richards

The Los Angeles Kings may owe Mike Richards money until 2031 (seriously), but in settling his grievance, the team and player more or less get to turn the page.

Not before Kings GM Dean Lombardi shares his sometimes startling perspective, though.

Lombardi has a tendency to be candid, especially in the press release-heavy world of sports management. Even by his standards, his account of Richards’ “destructive sprial” is a staggering read from the Los Angeles Times’ Lisa Dillman.

“Without a doubt, the realization of what happened to Mike Richards is the most traumatic episode of my career,” Lombardi said in a written summation he provided to the Los Angeles Times. “At times, I think that I will never recover from it. It is difficult to trust anyone right now – and you begin to question whether you can trust your own judgment. The only thing I can think of that would be worse would be suspecting your wife of cheating on you for five years and then finding out in fact it was true.”

Lombardi provides plenty of eyebrow-raising statements to Dillman, including:

  • He believed he “found his own Derek Jeter” in Richards, a player who “at one time symbolized everything that was special about the sport.”
  • Lombardi remarked that “his production dropped 50 percent and the certain ‘it’ factor he had was vaporizing in front of me daily.”
  • The Kings GM believes that he was “played” by Richards.

… Yeah.

Again, it’s a powerful read that you should soak in yourself, even if you’re unhappy with the way the Kings handled the situation.

Maybe the most pressing of many lingering questions is: will we get to hear Richards’ side of the story?

Coyotes exploit another lousy outing from Quick

Jonathan Quick

Despite owning two Stanley Cup rings, there are a healthy number of people who aren’t wild about Jonathan Quick.

Those people might feel validated through the Los Angeles Kings’ first two games, as he followed a rough loss to the San Jose Sharks with a true stinker against the Arizona Coyotes on Friday.

Sometimes a goalie has a bad night stats-wise, yet his team is as much to blame as anything else. You can probably pin this one on Quick, who allowed four goals on just 14 shots through the first two periods.

Things died down in the final frame, but let’s face it; slowing things down is absolutely the Coyotes’ design with a 4-1 lead (which ultimately resulted in a 4-1 win).


A soft 1-0 goal turned out to be a sign of things to come:

Many expected the Kings to roar into this second game after laying an egg in their opener. Instead, the Coyotes exploited Quick’s struggles for a confidence-booster, which included key prospect Max Domi scoring a goal and an assist.

It’s worth mentioning that Mike Smith looked downright fantastic at times, only drawing more attention to Quick’s struggles.


After a troubled summer and a failed 2014-15 season, Los Angeles was likely eager to start things off the right way.

Instead, they instead will likely focus on the fact that they merely dropped two (ugly) games.