NHL fight

The Big Question: Would you trade places with an NHL enforcer?


The Big Question will be a weekly feature on PHT where we ask a question, provide some background and ask you, the reader, to weigh in with your opinions.

Today’s question: Would you trade places with an NHL enforcer?

By all accounts, playing in the NHL is a pretty cool job. The money is great. You get a shot to win the Stanley Cup. And even if you don’t, you’re still treated like a king.

Fact is, not many of us will ever know how it feels to be cheered by thousands of people. Chances are, it’s a great feeling.

But how far would you go to make it happen? If your only route to the NHL was as an enforcer, would you take it? With all we’re learning about concussions, would it be worth the risk?

Here’s Predators enforcer Brian McGrattan’s take on the job: “It’s just what I do. If I had a problem doing it and I couldn’t function an everyday normal life then I wouldn’t do it.”

Unfortunately, McGrattan can’t be guaranteed he’ll lead “an everyday normal life” long after he retires from hockey. Granted, nobody can be guaranteed that, but McGrattan’s risk of concussion-related problems down the line is almost certainly enhanced given his vocation.

Former NHL player Keith Primeau is still feeling the effects of the numerous concussions he suffered playing the game. However, he doesn’t regret the path he chose.

“I feel extremely blessed to have the opportunity to play in the National Hockey League for 15 years,” Primeau told TSN, “and I can’t say that I would change that course.”

That said, this is the price he continues to pay: “The most notable, on a day to day is the headaches and the head pressure and stiffness in the neck and still a lot of vision. I kind of feel like I’ve got to shake my head sometimes trying to get my vision about me, which is obviously very bizarre. And then I’m still not able to exert any kind of physical energy cause then I get dizziness, light headed, and definitely fatigue.”

OK, so here’s the deal. You get a seven-year career in the NHL, from age 24 to 30. All told you’ll make $6 million. You’ll fight 100 times, mostly against heavyweights, plus all the scraps you had on the way up. There’s a 25-percent chance you’ll win the Cup, but you’re guaranteed one long playoff run to at least the conference finals. The reason you retire is unknown. Maybe you’re not good enough anymore. Maybe it’s an assortment of injuries. Maybe you get your face caved in.

Would you do it?

Kings GM says Mike Richards went into ‘a destructive spiral’

Mike Richards
Leave a comment

The Los Angeles Kings may owe Mike Richards money until 2031 (seriously), but in settling his grievance, the team and player more or less get to turn the page.

Kings GM Dean Lombardi ranks among the NHL’s most outspoken executives. Even so, his discussion of what he calls Richards’ “destructive sprial” is a staggering read from the Los Angeles Times’ Lisa Dillman.

“Without a doubt, the realization of what happened to Mike Richards is the most traumatic episode of my career,” Lombardi said in a written summation he provided to the Los Angeles Times. “At times, I think that I will never recover from it. It is difficult to trust anyone right now – and you begin to question whether you can trust your own judgment. The only thing I can think of that would be worse would be suspecting your wife of cheating on you for five years and then finding out in fact it was true.”

Lombardi provides plenty of eyebrow-raising statements to Dillman, including:

  • He believed he “found his own Derek Jeter” in Richards, a player who “at one time symbolized everything that was special about the sport.”
  • Lombardi remarked that “his production dropped 50 percent and the certain ‘it’ factor he had was vaporizing in front of me daily.” (Bold claim: the production part was probably the bigger sticking point.)
  • The Kings GM believes that he was “played” by Richards.

… Yeah.

Again, it’s a powerful read that you should soak in yourself, even if you’re unhappy with the Lombardi and the Kings handled the situation.

Maybe the most pressing of many lingering questions is: will we get to hear Richards’ side of the story?

Coyotes exploit another lousy outing from Quick

Jonathan Quick
Leave a comment

Despite owning two Stanley Cup rings, there are a healthy number of people who aren’t wild about Jonathan Quick.

Those people might feel validated through the Los Angeles Kings’ first two games, as he followed a rough loss to the San Jose Sharks with a true stinker against the Arizona Coyotes on Friday.

Sometimes a goalie has a bad night stats-wise, yet his team is as much to blame as anything else. You can probably pin this one on Quick, who allowed four goals on just 14 shots through the first two periods.

Things died down in the final frame, but let’s face it; slowing things down is absolutely the Coyotes’ design with a 4-1 lead (which ultimately resulted in a 4-1 win).


A soft 1-0 goal turned out to be a sign of things to come:

Many expected the Kings to roar into this second game after laying an egg in their opener. Instead, the Coyotes exploited Quick’s struggles for a confidence-booster, which included key prospect Max Domi scoring a goal and an assist.

It’s worth mentioning that Mike Smith looked downright fantastic at times, only drawing more attention to Quick’s struggles.


After a troubled summer and a failed 2014-15 season, Los Angeles was likely eager to start things off the right way.

Instead, they instead will likely focus on the fact that they merely dropped two (ugly) games.