Is a position change in Patrick Kane’s future?

The Chicago Blackhawks lost in a shootout to the rival Detroit Red Wings on Sunday night. As exciting as preseason shootouts can be, the biggest news from Joe Louis Arena may not have come from the ice—but from the Blackhawks head coach’s postgame comments. Joel Quenneville shared with assorted media members that the coaching staff is looking at star winger Patrick Kane as a possible solution for Chicago’s gaping hole at center on the second line.

The announcement is a bit surprising in that it was assumed that Patrick Sharp was going to make the move from wing to center this season. Sharp has played center at times with both the Philadelphia Flyers and the Chicago Blackhawks over the course of his career. Last season, the #10 Train had a career year with 34 goals and 37 assists for the Hawks while playing mostly on the wing.

Sharp still may end up being the long-term replacement for Troy Brouwer for the Hawks this season. But Quenneville’s public statements mean that the organization plans on giving Kane a serious look. In fact, this has been going on for a while in practices during training camp this year. He told CSN Chicago’s Tracey Myers that, “he’s been playing center throughout scrimmages and practices now and we’ll see.”

This wouldn’t be the first time Patrick Kane has ever played center. He has experience and Quenneville thinks he might be able to play the all-around game expected from an NHL pivot:

“He’s played center most of his life. Defensively, he’s gotten better as he’s grown… down low on the walls. It’s something we’re going to at least take a look at.”

The obvious changes from wing to center are the defensive responsibilities and faceoff duties. Kane only took 14 face-offs all season—and only won two of them. But another change that isn’t as well publicized, is the difference for a center when the team breaks out of their own zone. Wingers are usually looking back at the play, while centers can see the entire ice in front of them. Players with good vision (like Kane) can see the play develop with all of the action unfolding up the ice. For highly-skilled forwards, transitioning to the center position can be easier than transitioning to wing.

Whether the Hawks decide to move Kane, Sharp, or a prospect like Marcus Kruger to center, figuring out the second line pivot is one of the more important decisions the coaching staff will make in training camp. Jonathan Toews has the top center position locked up for the next twenty years and Dave Bolland has established himself as a premier shutdown defender. Guys like Daniel Carcillo and Jamal Mayers may prove they can play center on the fourth line, leaving the noticeable void on the second line.

It’s intriguing to hear that Chicago is considering a player like Kane at center. Not only is it interesting that they’d split up the Toews/Kane duo, but seeing Kane put in a position to create offensive with a pair of wingers, is something that could be interesting. Guys like Daniel Briere and Derek Roy have been proving that centers no longer need to be the 6’4”, 230 lbs imposing physical forces they used to be. Then again, not everyone can make the transition with the increased defensive duties.

Since it’s the preseason, what do you think? Would you like to see Patrick Kane play center for a few games, or do you think it’s pointless to mess with a good thing?

Talbot torments Ducks as Oilers take 2-0 series lead

2 Comments

Those who vehemently argued for Cam Talbot being a Vezina finalist likely felt vindicated tonight (even if postseason results don’t factor into the voting).

In Game 1, Leon Draisaitl stole the show. Talbot was the standout of Game 2, snubbing a steady Ducks threat as Edmonton won 2-1 on Friday.

And, just like that, the Oilers are up 2-0 in their second-round series against the Anaheim Ducks. Better yet for this young group: the venue shifts to what’s likely to be a rowdy scene in Edmonton for Games 3 and 4.

The tone was set when Andrej Sekera scored just 65 seconds into the contest. That said, the Oilers could have sulked when a would-be 2-0 goal was called off (and they had to kill a penalty). Instead, they just kept battling, even after Jakob Silfverberg ended Talbot’s shutout bit with a laser beam on the power play.

Speaking of the power play, the Oilers managed to match the Ducks (1-for-4 each on the PP), even as Talbot faced 12 shots on goal during Anaheim’s power-play opportunities.

Talbot ultimately made 39 of 40 stops, and while the Ducks kept Connor McDavid from scoring, number 97 sure looked speedy and dangerous at times in Game 2.

Anaheim came into the second round with home-ice advantage through the West side of the playoffs, seemingly enjoying a golden opportunity when other conference powers fell. Instead, it’s looking like the Oilers might just have a chance to prove that they’re big-time contenders, too.

Game 3 airs on NBCSN at 7 p.m. ET on Sunday. You can watch online and via the NBC Sports App; click here for the livestream.

Latest goalie interference mess: Oilers get penalty, not goal

2 Comments

Ah, goalie interference. Does the fun ever start?

Arguably the most irritating facet of the 2017 Stanley Cup Playoffs reared its pesky head once again on Friday, as the Edmonton Oilers saw a would-be 2-0 goal disallowed in the first period of Game 2 against the Anaheim Ducks.

The goal wasn’t just disallowed, either, as Mark Letestu was given a minor penalty.

One would imagine that there are opinions for or against the goal (and penalty counting); there are also many who are just getting a little worn out by the uncertainty surrounding such calls. Tomas Holmstrom is nodding his head so hard right now, everyone.

Here’s one unhappy take:

Moments after this post went up, the Oilers made it 2-0 for real this time. Check out the game here.

Math may help build Vegas Knights, but biggest aim is not being boring

Getty
Leave a comment

Unlike Pierre Dorion, it sounds like Vegas Golden Knights GM George McPhee would rather listen to analytics-minded people rather than … you know, hit them.

As McPhee readies for the expansion draft, he told The Star’s Kevin McGran in Q&A that they’ll at least be factored into decisions.

I’ve been really fascinated by how revealing that data can be. You have these kids speaking a different language. But I’m convinced it has a really important place in this game. You have to pay attention to it, and you have to use it.

Naturally, the real question with McPhee and other executives comes down to how much they will lean on analytics. Some teams seem to pick and choose when to listen to such voices, ending up with an odd mix of moves that please and unnerve the “fancy stats” community.

Owner Bill Foley gave a good idea of how much they’ll lean on stats vs. more traditional approaches in an interview with the Vegas Hockey Hotline back in February, which was transcribed by The Hockey Writers’ Keith Scheessele.

“Analytics is not going to drive how we draft,” Foley said. “Analytics are going to supplement what the scouts are seeing. We’re going to rely on the scouts and what they recommend.”

(Foley also spoke of rating players in 10 different categories, which started to make one think about how old sports video games could only quantify skills in so many ways. Anyway …)

So, it sounds like McPhee & Co. will take a modern approach – a mixture of the old and the new – rather than going full-on bold and revolutionary like, say, the Cleveland Browns or Golden State Warriors.

Considering the mystery of roster quality one faces with the Vegas Knights, it honestly might be most important that McPhee is repeatedly stating that he doesn’t aim to put together a boring hockey team.

Hey, if it takes a while to be good, at least the Vegas Knights might fit with their environment and put on a show.

Tarasenko’s two goals help Blues tie series with Predators

3 Comments

One of the (many) remarkable things about the St. Louis Blues dispatching the Minnesota Wild was that they didn’t need a ton of production from Vladimir Tarasenko. He didn’t score a goal until the clinching game of that series.

The Blues needed more from him tonight, and he responded with two huge goals to help St. Louis win 3-2 in Game 2, tying the second-round series at 1-1.

Tarasenko scored the opening goal on that major power-play opportunity from the Vernon Fiddler knee on Colton Parayko, while Joel Edmundson wisely got out of the way to let Tarasenko nab the game-winner.

That ended up being the decisive factor as the Nashville Predators finally lost their first game of the postseason.

St. Louis must be breathing a sigh of relief for a number of reasons. The series shifts to Nashville for Games 3 and 4, so going down 2-0 might have been lethal.

Even beyond that, the Blues had some breaks go their way that likely won’t repeat to the same degree in future contests. The Predators didn’t receive a single power-play opportunity while St. Louis spent significant chunks of the contest on the man advantage, going 1-for-5 (but again, that includes a major).

The Blues also won despite what must have been a frustrating start. They only managed a 1-1 tie after the first 20 minutes despite holding Nashville to a mere three shots on goal.

The Predators also managed leads of 1-0 and 2-1, yet the Blues kept fighting to get back in this series. Game 3 will air on NBC at 3 p.m. ET on Sunday. You can watch online and via the NBC Sports App (Click here for the livestream link).

* – That said, he made a lot of commotion to set up Edmundson’s overtime game-winner from Game 1. That connection continued on Friday, as you likely noticed.