Blues hoping to pick new captain in training camp

1 Comment

The Blues and their fans have a few new things to look forward to coming into next season. They’ll have new expectations as they hope to make the playoffs for the first time since the 2008-09 season; and their first playoff win since 2004. They’ll have new veterans on the team to help bring success back to the Gateway City. They’ll even have a new slogan.

Most importantly from a leadership perspective, they’ll have a new captain leading them onto the ice.

There has been a vacancy at captain ever since the Blues traded away Eric Brewer to the Tampa Bay Lightning in middle of last season. They finished the season with three alternate captains sharing the leadership responsibilities—Alex Steen, Barret Jackman, and David Backes. Interestingly enough, the Blues aren’t sure if they’re going to pick one traditional captain or if they’re going to go with a group of rotating captains. The St. Louis Post-Dispatch’s Jeremy Rutherford spoke to Blues GM Doug Armstrong about the captain situation for next season:

“We want to get the input of some of the other people in our organization – the coaches, some people in our management staff – and we’ll have that decision by the first day of training camp… whether we go with a group of players that will make up a leadership group or we name a captain.

“We’re further ahead that we were at the end of the season, but we’re not at the point where we’ve solidified what we want to do, and that’s something that we’ll spend the next three weeks discussing.”

Earlier this offseason, we here at Pro Hockey Talk looked at the Blues captaincy situation and explained that promoting David Backes seems like a no-brainer. But if the Blues were to go with a rotating situation similar to the Minnesota Wild under Jacques Lemaire, the list of candidates gets a little murkier. Would they want to go with the current group of leaders (Jackman, Steen, Backes) who have been with the Blues for a longer period of time? Would they want to go with newcomers who look like they could be future cornerstones like Alex Pietrangelo or Chris Stewart? Would they want to give the “C” to a veteran, free agent acquisition like Jason Arnott or Jaime Langenbrunner? Any one of those guys is capable of wearing the “A” over the course of the season—and each is capable of wearing the “C” for a period of time as well.

It gets into a much deeper debate about the role of a captain on an NHL team. Most coaches and general managers will tell you that they expect leadership from every member of the team—they don’t need a letter on their jersey to set a good example. From that standpoint, rotating captains puts the responsibility on the team as a whole to hold their teammates accountable. In theory, it makes sense.

On the other hand, there are those who think a team needs a strong leader who is the acknowledged leader in the locker room. He’s the guy who, whether the team has given him the captaincy or not, has the undeniable respect of his teammates. It’s more of a “buck stops here” attitude—a player who will face his teammates and the media when things aren’t going well. A player who can approach the coach and management when things aren’t going well and some sort of change needs to be made. In short: an undisputed leader.

The Blues will use the rest of the offseason to figure out their captaincy situation. What do you think would be better for St. Louis? Should they make a guy like David Backes the permanent captain or should they go with rotating captains?

These 2017 NHL Draft picks lacked hype … but not swagger

Getty
Leave a comment

The interview process for draft prospects must be a real beating. Then again, it’s also an opportunity for hopefuls to push back.

In the case of two smaller prospects, it meant providing some swagger in their answers, possibly impressing their new teams. If nothing else, Kailer Yamamoto and Michael DiPietro generated some refreshingly confident quotes.

One would assume that the Edmonton Oilers picked Yamamoto with the 22nd choice for more than just a great answer alone … but still.

Nice, right?

Sportsnet’s Jeff Marek related a similar story about DiPietro, who the Vancouver Canucks nabbed with the 64th pick.

Funny story: When one team at the NHL told him “We don’t think you can play in the NHL with our team, you’re too small” at the combine, he fired back with “well, I guess you have a problem with winning, then.” How do you not like that?

If nothing else, those two aren’t shy.

As a bonus story, check out the bumpy path Will Reilly – aka the “Mr. Irrelevant” of the 2017 NHL Draft – took to being chosen last overall by the Pittsburgh Penguins, via Puck Daddy’s Sean Leahy. From the sound of things, there are worse feelings than going 217th.

The 2017 NHL Draft may have been “pumped down” from a hype perspective, yet it sounds like many of these prospects at least bring some moxie to the table.

Kings, Golden Knights labeled 2017 NHL Draft winners; Bruins, not so much

Getty
6 Comments

It’s nearly certain that we won’t be able to determine the “winners and losers” of the 2017 NHL Draft until, say, 2022. If not later.

Still, what fun is that?

Quite a few outlets pegged some winners and losers, though sometimes the choices were more about themes like nations or player types than specific teams.

For example: Puck Daddy gives a thumbs down to the “green room” experiment.

Let’s take a look at some of the consensus picks.

Winners

Vegas Golden Knights

GM George McPhee was dealt a bad hand when it comes to the lottery draft, so he instead made his own luck. And then he selected three players who could improve this team going forward.

Sportsnet’s Jeff Marek especially liked the last two of their three first-rounders (Nick Suzuki and Erik Brannstrom), viewing Cody Glass as more of a no-brainer. Plenty of others were on board.

Los Angeles Kings

Gabe Vilardi fell to Los Angeles, whether it was because of shaky skating or some other reason. That potential steal (and some other shrewd moves) impressed the Hockey News’ Ryan Kennedy, who assembled draft profiles for PHT.

Again, Vilardi’s loss was considered the Kings’ gain, as slower skaters were considered losers by the likes of Post Media’s Michael Traikos.

Philadelphia Flyers

Boy, Ron Hextall is good at this thing, isn’t he? Philly drew high marks even beyond the layup of landing Nolan Patrick. The main area of disagreement revolved around the Brayden Schenn trade, though plenty came out on Hextall’s side there, too.

Arizona Coyotes

Boy, that negative press didn’t last long, did it? Between landing Niklas Hjalmarsson, Derek Stepan, and Antti Raanta in trades and savvy picks, they were a popular choice.

Themes

Smaller players, Sweden, and Finland drew semi-serious mentions as “winners.”

Losers

Boston Bruins

The perception is that they played it too safe.

Colorado Avalanche, for now?

OK, this was more about draft weekend than picks, but people are criticizing Joe Sakic for standing pat. That could change, but the negative sentiment is there.

Detroit Red Wings

Another common choice. Some believe that their draft was the worst of them all, which isn’t great considering the declining opinion of GM Ken Holland overall.

New York Rangers

Lias Andersson was viewed as a reach by plenty, and his connection to the trade to Arizona might intensify the scrutiny.

Themes

Not a great draft for Russian-born players and/or guys who don’t skate quite swiftly.

***

So, those are some of the near-consensus choices for winners and losers, via the brave souls who made rapid reactions to the 2017 NHL Draft.

Ducks ink D Holzer to two-year deal reportedly worth $1.8M

Getty
2 Comments

As the dust settled on the expansion draft, the Anaheim Ducks’ defense is coming into focus.

Sunday continued that pattern; the Ducks signed Korbinian Holzer to a two-year contract worth $1.8 million, according to TVA’s Renaud Lavoie.

You can break down the Ducks defense as more expensive players (Hampus Lindholm, Sami Vatanen, Cam Fowler, and Kevin Bieksa) and cheaper ones (Holzer, Brandon Montour, and Josh Manson).

Only Vatanen, Lindholm and Holzer see contracts that go beyond 2017-18 – at least without an extension yet for the likes of Fowler and Manson – so Holzer provides a little bit of certainty.

Is the $900K a minor overpay, though? Holzer played in 32 games for the Ducks this season after appearing in 29 in 2015-16. His impact has been pretty minimal, generating seven points while averaging 13:31 in ice time per contest (down from 14:45 the previous season).

Granted he may get more opportunities to show what he’s capable of if the Ducks lose another piece. Then again, at 29, the Ducks likely know what they have.

2017 Hockey Hall of Fame class to be named Monday; Selanne + who?

Getty
6 Comments

The 2017 Hockey Hall of Fame class is expected to be announced on Monday, and every indication is that Teemu Selanne will be on the list. Beyond that, well, there are a lot of question marks.

NHL.com notes that there’s at least a possibility that Selanne will be the only NHL name to be part of this class, which would mark a first since 2010 (when Dino Ciccarelli was the lone addition).

It’s a nice way to continue what’s been a buffet for hockey fans: the 2017 Stanley Cup Final’s conclusion, the expansion draft and then the 2017 NHL Draft. The HHOF announcements are a nice appetizer before free agency gets, well, frenzied?

“The Finnish Flash” was also an obvious top choice in last year’s poll to see who should be in the class.

Now, that doesn’t mean he is the only interesting name.

For one thing, Daniel Alfredsson will be eligible for the first time, much like Selanne. “Alf” falls in the “Maybe” category with some interesting, debatable other options: Mark Recchi, Dave Andreychuk, Alex Mogilny, Jeremy Roenick, Paul Kariya, Chris Osgood, and more.

The 2016 Hockey Hall of Fame class included Eric Lindros, Rogie Vachon, Sergei Makarov, and Pat Quinn.