nikitafilatov

Wait, what? Nikita Filatov says he’s been promised a spot on Senators’ first or second line

9 Comments

As the cost to run a professional sports team inflates with each passing year, it seems like franchises are starting to warm up to the idea of making decisions based on logic rather than wild leaps of faith. It’s better for the collective blood pressure of their fan bases, but makes it less fun to ridicule bad decisions. For the sake of our collective entertainment, the NHL still has its fair share of exceptions, though.

The Ottawa Senators rank as one of the more amusing exceptions – unless you’re a fan of the team, of couse. During GM Bryan Murray’s time at the helm, the team mowed through five different coaches and lost several valuable players while rarely getting anything of value in return. Sometimes those mistakes weren’t totally Murray’s fault (Dany Heatley didn’t exactly make it easy to get fair value when he demanded a trade), but few could follow the logic of many other moves.*

In a way, it makes them a perfect match for Nikita Filatov, one of the most puzzling figures in recent draft years whom they traded for this off-season. The Columbus Blue Jackets essentially repeated history with Nikolay Zherdev when they drafted Filatov, as the right-handed Russian winger clashed with the Blue Jackets coaching staff, made an exodus to Russia and generally gave off a vibe of entitlement. (To be fair to Zherdev, he was far more productive at the NHL level than Filatov in his early days.)

It’s quite possible that the Blue Jackets deserve equal blame in his blunders – they have a horrible track record with first round draft picks not named Rick Nash, after all – but Filatov hasn’t done much to make them regret their supposed errors. He’s been especially underwhelming at the NHL level, scoring just six goals and seven assists for 13 points in 44 career games split over three seasons.

There’s nothing wrong with the Senators making a low-risk gamble that Filatov might turn things around, especially considering the Blue Jackets’ track record of developmental blunders. But of course, it could never be that simple. Dmitri Chesnokov passes along a report that Filatov claims Murray “promised” him a first or second line spot and time on the power play.

source:

There are a few reasons why this is an interesting (and baffling) development. On one hand, it’s not that far fetched to imagine Filatov sliding into a top six forward role with Ottawa considering the Senators’ glaring lack of talent. It’s even conceivable that he might flourish in that role if he’s lucky enough to earn time with Jason Spezza, another much-derided player who happens to boast buckets of offensive talent.

That being said, it seems a bit odd (and almost anti-competitive) to promise Filatov a role before he even steps foot in training camp. It almost seems to embolden an attitude that he’s arrived already, which seems like the worst track to take with a player who is really nothing but potential right now.

Of course, there’s one possibility for the hasty promise: Filatov might consider going to the KHL instead. There are some rumblings about that being possible, but there’s nothing concrete at this time. We’ll keep an eye on this rather odd situation, but it all seems to add up to another reason why the Senators’ 20th season could be awfully ugly.

* – One of my favorites was the Chris Campoli trade. Murray sent Dean McAmmond and a first round pick to the New York Islanders for Campoli and Mike Comrie even though the Senators were clearly already out of reasonable playoff contention. The Senators ended up traded Campoli almost exactly two years later.

Lehtonen only lasts one period in Game 2

Lehtonen
1 Comment

Kari Lehtonen might have been more hit than miss in the playoffs going into today’s action, but Game 2 against St. Louis was certainly a start he’d like to forget.

Dallas outshot St. Louis 10-5 in the first frame, but the Blues still managed to take a 3-1 lead. Antti Niemi replaced Lehtonen for the second period which means, barring another goalie change, Lehtonen will actually end up with a sub-.500 save percentage this afternoon.

The numbers obviously look bad and it’s hard not to blame Lehtonen in the face of that, but the Blues deserve a lot of the credit for those goals. Patrik Berglund had a great shot on goal for the first marker, Joel Edmundson‘s first career playoff goal came after a nice setup by Troy Brouwer, and when Brouwer collected his own goal it was off of a rebound during a power play.

So to an extent, you could say Lehtonen looked bad due to circumstances that were very unfavorable to him. Nevertheless, the Stars needed to shake things up after what was unquestionably a bad period for them.

Dupuis, Jagr, Zuccarello are Masterton Trophy finalists

NEW YORK, NY - DECEMBER 18:  Pascal Dupuis #9 of the Pittsburgh Penguins in action against the New York Rangers during their game at Madison Square Garden on December 18, 2013 in New York City.  (Photo by Al Bello/Getty Images)
Getty Images
2 Comments

Pittsburgh’s Pascal Dupuis, Florida’s Jaromir Jagr, and the Rangers’ Mats Zuccarello have been selected as the three finalists for the Bill Masterton Memorial Trophy.

The Masterton Trophy recognizes “the National Hockey League player who best exemplifies the qualities of perseverance, sportsmanship and dedication to hockey.” In 2015 it went to Devan Dubnyk, who struggled mightily in 2013-14, but dramatically turned his career around the following season and led the Minnesota Wild to the playoffs in the process.

Dupuis attempted to play in the 2015-16 campaign while taking blood thinners, but on Dec. 8 he announced that he would stop playing “because of a medical condition related to blood clots.”

Jagr celebrated his 44th birthday in February, but despite his age he managed to score 27 goals and 66 points in 79 contests this season. With that, he became the oldest player to reach the 60-point mark in a single NHL campaign.

Zuccarello played in 81 games and set career-highs with 26 goals and 61 points this season after suffering a skull fracture and brain contusion during the 2015 playoffs that left him temporarily unable to speak.

Can there be parallels drawn between the 2016 Ducks and 2014 Sharks?

Anaheim Ducks center Ryan Kesler (17) takes the puck up ice on a breakaway with San Jose Sharks defenseman Marc-Edouard Vlasic, center, and Ducks center Nate Thompson, right, trailing on the play during the second period of an NHL hockey game in Anaheim, Calif., Tuesday, Feb. 2, 2016. (AP Photo/Alex Gallardo)
AP Photo
1 Comment

The Anaheim Ducks might not have suffered a reverse sweep at the hands of one of their biggest rivals, but they seem to have reached a breaking point when it comes to playoff disappointments.

After firing head coach Bruce Boudreau, GM Bob Murray was highly critical of the team’s core, even noting that at this point he’s not a fan of long-term contracts. That was perhaps a swipe at how he feels Corey Perry and Ryan Getzlaf‘s eight-year $69 million and $66 million contracts have worked out thus far. Meanwhile Ryan Kesler‘s six-year deal worth roughly $41 million is about to begin.

After San Jose suffered its first round loss to the Los Angeles Kings in 2014, Sharks GM Doug Wilson said they were now becoming a “tomorrow team” and they began a cultural shift that included Joe Thornton losing the captaincy.

There are differences of course between the two situations. One notable one is that the Sharks’ guard was already starting to change hands in 2013-14. Joe Thornton and Patrick Marleau were entering their mid-30s, but Joe Pavelski and Logan Couture were on the rise. Anaheim’s core of Getzlaf and Perry is significantly younger, but while Anaheim also has some promising forwards like Jakob Silfverberg, that generation of players doesn’t seem ready to carry the torch for the Ducks.

“We don’t have a lot of young guys in the lineup. … Today’s a much different feeling leaving the rink,” Ducks forward Andrew Cogliano said, per the Los Angeles Times. “In those [previous] years there’s been a sense of hope. Today, there’s zero feeling like that.”

Perhaps the Anaheim Ducks will find hope by watching the rest of the 2016 playoffs. If the San Jose Sharks continue to succeed, they will be an example of a team that once underachieved, hit a critical low, but then managed to fix that in a relatively short time without a massive turnover in terms of on-ice personnel. While we’re at it, you could make a similar argument for the Washington Capitals.

Maybe Murray will look to those franchises for inspiration as he moves forward.

Capitals, Penguins nearly perfect at stopping third period comebacks

Pittsburgh Penguins center Sidney Crosby (87) and Washington Capitals defenseman Matt Niskanen (2) chase down the puck during the first period of Game 2 in an NHL hockey Stanley Cup Eastern Conference semifinals Saturday, April 30, 2016 in Washington. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)
AP Photo
4 Comments

Pittsburgh only won by a single goal in Game 2 on Saturday and that deciding marker came with 4:28 minutes remaining in the third, but that contest had the potential to be far more one-sided.

The Capitals were outshot 28-10 through 40 minutes and were consequently leaning on goaltender Braden Holtby to keep things close.

“First two periods, I thought they were way better than us,” Washington coach Barry Trotz told CSN Mid-Atlantic. Or has Justin Williams put it, the Capitals “were getting embarrassed out there” during the first 40 minutes.

Washington did rebound in the third period, though it wasn’t enough to prevent the Penguins from evening this series at 1-1. That puts the pressure on Washington to take at least one game in Pittsburgh before the second round’s over.

Starting the game off strong is always going to be important, but that’s particularly true when talking about the Penguins and Capitals. Pittsburgh was 39-0-0 in the regular season when leading after 40 minutes while Washington was 37-0-1. So far in the playoffs, both teams are 4-0-0 when they have the lead after two periods.