It’s far from unusual for retired sports legends to appear in video games. That being said, most games do very little beyond inserting a highly-rated counterpart who bares little resemblance to that player beyond his name – or worse yet, just his jersey number and position. There’s a big difference between doing that and actually capturing something of the essence of that player or vintage team.
That’s the thing that made NBA 2K11’s use of Michael Jordan so special. The game featured a mode in which you could follow the basketball legend’s career high points, but it was the obvious dedication to replicating the style and feel of classic Bulls teams (and their rivals, such as the 1994-95 New York Knicks) that gave that game such incredible replay value. As a jilted Phoenix Suns fan, it was rewarding to try to take on those great Bulls teams in a way that felt like the real thing. (Although I must admit that I was saddened by the absence of Charles Barkley, Kevin Johnson and “Thunder” Dan Majerle.)
As great as that game and feature was, I couldn’t help but yearn for a hockey equivalent. While it is unclear how much hockey legends will be implemented, the latest teaser for EA Sports’ NHL ’12 game reveals that some of the NHL’s all-time greats will be included in the game. This Game Trailers.com video hints that Wayne Gretzky and Mario Lemieux will be included while Sean Leahy points out some Accomplishments that hint at the inclusion of Gordie Howe and Pavel Bure as well.
That could be a lot of fun, but the most important thing with this feature – for me at least – is that they capture some of the nuisances of each player. If Gretzky is just a playmaker with high ratings, it won’t be as satisfying as it would be to slice opposing defenses apart from his “office.” Lemieux needs a ridiculous reach advantage. Howe needs to be tough as nails (and if they’re really going over the top) the ability to shoot both left and right-handed.
The impression I got from that trailer is that they’re focusing solely on individual stars rather than classic teams, although a previous edition of the NHL series featured an all-time team of Montreal Canadiens stars to commemorate their 100th anniversary. If it’s a legends-only feature this year, maybe they could work on a handful of great teams for a future iteration if the feature becomes popular. After all, how much fun would it be to pit dynasty-era Oilers teams against the dominant Montreal Canadiens groups and so on?
Perhaps the hinted-upon August 11 reveal will give us more information about the legends and other aspects of NHL ’12, which will release on September 13. Either way, we’ll keep an eye open for the most interesting details.
(H/T to Puck Daddy.)
So far, the 2015-16 crop of rookies is living up to the hype, if not exceeding it. Connor McDavid‘s unfortunate injury hasn’t even derailed this year’s crop.
The Detroit Red Wings are watching their own blue chip blossom, as Dylan Larkin is making an instant impact.
No. 71 scored his 10th goal of the season against the Florida Panthers on Sunday, fattening his rookie goals lead.
He still needs five points to match rookie points leader Artemi Panarin, though.
There’s one thing we seem to know about Carey Price‘s injury situation: he first got hurt stepping on a puck on Oct. 29, according to Sportsnet’s Elliotte Friedman.
Contrary to earlier reports about him missing about a month, it sounds like his window of recovery is still up in the air (which, to be fair, could mean that he’ll still miss about a month when it’s all said and done).
ESPN’s Pierre LeBrun reports that Price underwent testing with Montreal’s team doctor on Saturday and is expected to go through more; we may not know more about his expected injury timeline until early this coming week.
So, basically, Price’s situation is fuzzier than his mustache right now.
Leg injuries can be tricky anyway, so we shouldn’t be too surprised that there are mixed signals regarding Price, and this may remain a fluid situation for some time.
(But we’ll hopefully know more soon enough.)
The Tampa Bay Lightning have plenty of time to rise above mediocrity, yet it still must be deserving to finish at .500 for two straight months.
After last night’s 3-2 loss to the New York Islanders, that’s exactly where they find themselves:
Record at the end of October: 5-5-2
Record at the end of November: 11-11-3
As of this writing, the Lightning found themselves on the outside looking in at the playoff picture. It all stands as a pretty tough thing for the reigning Eastern Conference champs to swallow.
The uncomfortable-yet-vital question is: can the Lightning break out of this funk?
Looking at their schedule, it won’t be easy, at least not right away.
They crawl through California during a three-game road trip to start December, and they also face six of eight on the road from Dec. 2 – 18.
The Lightning soak up home dates to finish 2015 after that, but what damage will be done by then?
Frankly, the Bolts will need to dig deep to break this pattern. If nothing else, they’ve fought with their backs against the wall before.
Sometimes a suspension will shame a player, or at least inspire him to change the way he plays.
That apparently won’t happen regarding Brandon Dubinsky‘s one-game timeout session for cross-checking Sidney Crosby.
Dubinsky told Aaron Portzline of the Columbus Dispatch that he won’t alter his style, whether it’s against Crosby or someone else.
“Nope,” Dubinsky said. “You know, I’ve played the same way my whole career and I’m not going to change. The next time I have an opportunity to play (Crosby), I’m going to play him hard.”
In case you’re wondering, that next opportunity comes on Dec. 21 in Pittsburgh, assuming that both players are healthy and not suspended.
One can understand Dubinsky’s perspective, although such honesty would be that much more interesting if there’s another incident with Crosby. His initial reaction to the hit was interestingly candid, admitting that his “stick rode up” on his adversary.
Would that stance – which, from a harsher view, might seem flippant to Dubinsky’s critics – open the door for a bigger future bit of a discipline?
Maybe, maybe not … but at least his comments aren’t as inflammatory as what John Tortorella said (at least on the record).