T.J. Oshie, Alexander Steen, Ian Cole, Kevin Shattenkirk, T.J. Hensick, Keith Tkachuk, Red Berenson, Gary Unger, Joe Mullen

Best and worst sweaters of all-time: St. Louis Blues

2 Comments

So the Blues don’t have a Stanley Cup in their history, but they do have a history of classic sweaters with an era in the mid-1990s that made everyone wonder just what in the world they were smoking. We’ve all been there. If you’re familiar at all with what the Blues have done in the past, you’ve got a good idea how this list will looks.

Best: The Blues have a long history dating back to the late 1960s, but their best sweater in franchise history dates back to the early 1970s. It’s simple, it’s to the point, and it doesn’t have a nonsensical circular logo. That’s about all we can ask for out of a sweater and the early effective simplicity of just having a blue music note mixed in with white and yellow is perfect.

Worst: Just about the last color you’d like to have dominate a jersey when your team is called the St. Louis Blues is the color red. Red is the color of division rivals Detroit and Chicago and yet while red was a minor highlight of the Blues’ sweaters during the 90s, from 1995-1998 the Blues made red a much bigger factor of their look. Adding a prominent trumpet logo to the shoulders didn’t help the look much and to top it all off, it helped make Wayne Gretzky look like a chump.

Old-timey favorite: The Blues’ current third is nice in that modern vintage look but it’s been done to death by now. The old timey one I’m digging on is the one the Blues broke out in the mid-80s that featured the blue note as well as an arching word mark. It was like a vintage jersey that existed in an era where it was entirely out of place and before it was chic. I’m OK with that.

Disaster averted: During the 1995-1996 season, the Blues were also going to join the third jersey crush and the design they had cooked up would’ve made theirs, by far, the worst NHL sweater to ever see the light of day. It was highlighted by a cartoon mascot, Cool Cat, that touted how “cool” it was going to be. Instead of being awesome, it was more like Poochie the dog from The Simpsons.

The night the Blues were to take the ice in these monstrosities, then head coach Mike Keenan said there was no way his team was taking the ice adorning a jersey made up of music notes, trumpets, and sweeping team colors. Say it with us folks, “Thank you, Mike Keenan.”

Assessment: Their current sweaters are nice. They’re very blue, they highlight the blue note logo perfectly and if nothing else, they’re a little dull. That’s OK though because after the red era of the mid-90s they had to bring the excitement level down a few notches. Their third jersey is striking and honors the team and the city nicely and I’m a fan of it myself, but it was the jersey that unleashed the fury of circular logo third jerseys upon the NHL the last couple years. What was sort of original once became tired looking later on. That’s unfortunate.

Report: Coyotes’ Rieder is considering KHL, among other options

New York Islanders v Arizona Coyotes
Getty
Leave a comment

Arizona Coyotes forward Tobias Rieder has a big decision to make. The 23-year-old restricted free agent has been embroiled in contentious contract negotiations for much of the offseason, and now he’s reportedly considering his options.

According to TSN’s Bob McKenzie, those options include taking the Coyotes offer, requesting a trade, signing in the KHL, or sitting out.

Rieder had 14 goals and 23 assists in 82 games last season for Arizona. Born in Germany, he’s currently representing Team Europe in the World Cup final against Canada.

Rieder’s agent, Darren Ferris, has said his client won’t attend Coyotes training camp after the World Cup is over — unless, of course, a deal is struck.

“We’ve made them a fair offer at two years at $2.5 million a year, and they’re unwilling to do it,” Ferris recently told the Arizona Republic.

The Coyotes have reportedly offered between $2 million and $2.3 million per season on a two-year deal, so it’s not exactly a huge gulf between the two sides.

Of course, it wasn’t a huge gulf between Vladimir Sobotka and the St. Louis Blues, and look what happened there.

Shaw (boarding) to have hearing after getting tossed in Habs debut

TAMPA, FL - JUNE 02:  Andrew Shaw #65 of the Chicago Blackhawks speaks during Media Day for the 2015 NHL Stanley Cup Final at Amalie Arena on June 2, 2015 in Tampa, Florida.  (Photo by Bruce Bennett/Getty Images)
Getty
Leave a comment

Didn’t take long for Andrew Shaw to do Andrew Shaw things in Montreal.

The noted agitator, acquired from Chicago at the draft, will have the NHL’s first disciplinary hearing of the season on Thursday — today, the Department of Player Safety announced that Shaw will be called to the carpet after getting tossed for boarding Washington’s Connor Hobbs last night.

Shaw was quickly challenged by Caps forward Nathan Walker following the hit, and the two squared off. Shaw was then given a five-minute boarding major, a major for fighting, a misconduct and a game misconduct.

All told, 30 PIM.

This won’t be Shaw’s first visit with the DoPS. Far from it. He was suspended for making a homophobic slur during an opening-round playoff loss to St. Louis in the spring and, prior to that:

— Avoided suspension for a high hit on Francois Beauchemin.

— Allegedly bit Victor Hedman during the ’15 Stanley Cup Final.

— Was fined $2,000 for diving.

— Avoided suspension for charging Barret Jackman.

— Avoided suspension for headbutting Brock Nelson.

And those are just the infractions since 2015.

Report: Players still undecided on how to split World Cup profits

NEW YORK, NY - SEPTEMBER 13:  Don Fehr, executive director of the National Hockey League Players Association meets with the media at the Marriott Marquis Times Square on September 13, 2012 in New York City. Joining him from left to right is Ruslan Fedotenko, Henrik Lundqvist, Zdeno Chara and Sidney Crosby.  (Photo by Bruce Bennett/Getty Images)
Getty
2 Comments

You’d think the NHLPA would’ve already decided how to split its share of World Cup profits among its membership.

But according to a report by TSN’s Rick Westhead, you’d be wrong:

While the accounting on the World Cup probably won’t be finished for several months – meaning the NHLPA doesn’t yet know exactly how much money there will be to split between its members – NHLPA staff and players discussed the concept of 50 per cent of the union’s share of profits being split between players in the World Cup, with the other 50 per cent being split by NHL players not in the event.

During a meeting with NHLPA divisional player representative Joe Reekie, some players on Team Russia said all World Cup profits should remain with players who are playing in the event, a source told TSN. Some players on Team Czech Republic suggested in a separate meeting that an 80/20 split (favoring players in the World Cup) should be considered, the source said.

Profits for the tournament have been pegged at around $65 million, split 50-50 between the league and the players’ association. So assuming those projections are correct, that’s around $32.5 million for the NHLPA to divvy up. Not a huge amount on a per-player basis, especially considering what the average player makes all by himself. But chances are, this is not going to be the only World Cup, so it could set a precedent for future events.

Kesler was ‘really disappointed’ with World Cup atmosphere

TORONTO, ON - SEPTEMBER 16:  Ryan Kesler #17 of Team USA skates with the puck during practice at the World Cup of Hockey 2016 at Air Canada Centre on September 16, 2016 in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.  (Photo by Minas Panagiotakis/Getty Images)
Getty
6 Comments

Check it out — a Team USA player talking about disappointment at the World Cup, yet not referencing his team’s lackluster effort!

“It was weird,” American forward Ryan Kesler said of the tournament’s atmosphere, per the O.C. Register. “I thought there’d be more of a buzz in Toronto. There wasn’t … It just didn’t seem like there was a buzz.

“If you didn’t know what was going on, you wouldn’t even know teams were playing. That’s the only thing I was really disappointed with.”

The World Cup reboot was always going to have issues in this regard.

The timing of the tournament — early September, when the sports landscape is dominated by NCAA football and the NFL — almost guaranteed it would be buried. That early September start also meant even the most hardcore hockey fans still viewed the World Cup as something of an exhibition, or glorified training camp.

Creating Team North America and Team Europe initially added an extra element of hokiness. While both eventually proved worthy competitors, that didn’t happen until the tournament was underway.

And yeah, Team Europe has been a remarkable story.

But it hasn’t helped the buzz factor.

In Tuesday’s 3-1 loss to Canada in the first of the best-of-three final, Europe didn’t exactly bring in the fans. Several pundits tweeted out the alarming number of empty seats at the Air Canada Centre (see here and here), and Canadian forward Steve Stamkos addressed how the rivalry — or lack thereof — with Europe translated into a muted affair.

“It’s tough just because there’s not that natural rivalry here,” Stamkos explained, per Yahoo. “In some of the other games, we had away fans that were creating some noise.

“This was probably the team that had the least amount of support, just because of the makeup of the team in the tournament to start with.”

Attendance issues have been a theme throughout the event. Several group games started at 3 p.m. ET — on weekdays, no less — which resulted in subpar crowd numbers at the ACC. The highly-anticipated USA-Canada grudge match never came to fruition, with the Americans sputtering out as one of the tournament’s biggest disappointments.

North America’s elimination didn’t help the buzz factor, either.

In the end, all of this will probably be chalked up to a learning experience for the NHL and NHLPA, which is fair. This tournament was filled with several major unknowns coming in, and predicting how those would play out was a near impossible task.

Now, both sides know what worked and what didn’t. And they’ve got plenty of time to make some changes.