Devils sign top pick Adam Larsson to three-year entry level deal; Will he play in NHL this year?

Not since 1991 and Scott Niedermayer have the Devils had a top prospect defenseman come along with as much hope and hype as 2011 top pick Adam Larsson has. Larsson was the top defensive prospect in the draft and when the Oilers, Avalanche, and Panthers all passed on him Devils GM Lou Lamoriello was more than happy to grab him fourth overall. Now they’ll get to see what they’ve really got on their hands as the Devils have signed Larsson to his three-year entry level contract.

The Devils had a bit of a time crunch to get a deal done with Larsson now as if he made it past 5 p.m. ET today, his contract with his Swedish pro team would’ve kicked in meaning the Devils would’ve had to pay out to bring him over. Instead, he signs his three year contract and avoids both costing the Devils extra money and potentially spending one more year in Sweden.

The other unique thing about Larsson’s deal is that it comes without the usual bells and whistles of performance bonuses that you see in draft pick entry level deals. Those bonuses, regardless of what they are, are included as part of the salary cap hit for the player and it helps the Devils out immensely to have Larsson agree to signing without those kickbacks. Larsson’s salary cap hit for the three seasons he sees time in the NHL will be $925,000. Larsson’s agent J.P. Barry says the deal is unique for a top ten pick.

“Everything is maximum except obviously he doesn’t have individual ‘A’ bonuses,” Barry said.

Barry said he’s never previously had a top 10 pick not have an individual bonus package as part of his entry-level contract.

“We’ve had several players in the top 10 and we’ve always had bonuses packages and even into the top 20 in many instances,” Barry said. “That’s the way the system is designed. At the same time, Lou has never given individual bonuses at any time. Obviously, the difference here is he’s never really had a top pick (since the entry-level cap system was put in place).”

 

Larsson joins a Devils team that’s in need of a solid, puck moving defenseman that can play great at both ends of the ice. Fortunately for New Jersey, Larsson fits the bill to be one of those players and they might need him to be that right away. Taking a look at the Devils defense for the upcoming season, one thing they’re severely lacking in is high-end talent.

New Jersey has Anton Volchenkov, Andy Greene, and Henrik Tallinder penciled in as their top three defensemen. With guys like Colin White, Mark Fayne, Jay Leach, and a still hurting Bryce Salvador filling out the roster for now that’s a very blue collar and not overly gifted set of players.

With the sort of game Larsson can bring to the ice, the Devils can get that solid two-way play they’ve been missing since Scott Niedermayer left town. While Larsson didn’t put up big offensive numbers, he’s got the skills to do well there as a pro and Hockey’s Future believes he’ll be a top pair defenseman in the NHL. While Larsson likes to look up to Nicklas Lidstrom (what Swedish defenseman doesn’t?) if he can make fans in New Jersey start thinking of Niedermayer, he’ll be a favorite there for a long time to come. For now, he’ll have to prove himself in training camp to see if he can earn a spot on the team.

While the Devils don’t have a head coach yet, if there’s anything we’ve learned during Lamoriello’s years running the Devils it’s that nothing is given, everything is earned. If Larsson can earn his spot in the NHL right out of camp, it’s doubtful he’ll be giving it up any time soon.

Should Erik Karlsson’s game-winning goal have counted?

Leave a comment

We’re only one game into the Sens-Rangers series, and we already have a little bit of controversy.

Ottawa won Game 1, 2-1, thanks to Erik Karlsson‘s game-winning goal from a seemingly impossible angle (seriously, he scored from the corner).

But should it have counted?

There’s no issue with the Karlsson shot going off Henrik Lundqvist‘s mask and in, but the Rangers felt that the referees missed an icing call moments before the goal happened.

Karlsson is standing near his own blue line when he sends a pass in Jean-Gabriel Pageau‘s direction. Did Pageau get a piece of it? It’s hard to tell from the angles we have at our disposal, but Alain Vigneault seemed to have had a good look at the play.

“We felt on their game-winning goal it should have been icing,” Vigneault said, per Sportsnet. “When we look at it, and look at the angles we get, I think it should have been icing. But at the end of the game you gotta play and you gotta do more than we did tonight to win.”

Challenging icing calls isn’t permitted, so when the officials decided that Pageau touched the puck, there’s nothing more the Rangers could do to reverse the call (except get the puck out of the zone when they had the chance).

 

2017 Stanley Cup Playoffs schedule for Friday, April 28

Leave a comment

Two games on the schedule tonight, as the St. Louis Blues and Anaheim Ducks look to avenge their losses to the Nashville Predators and Edmonton Oilers in Game 1.

Here’s what you need to know:

Nashville Predators vs. St. Louis Blues (Preds lead 1-0)

Time: 8:00 p.m. ET

Network: NBCSN (Stream online here)

Check out the highlights from Nashville’s 4-3 win in Game 1.

Edmonton Oilers vs. Anaheim Ducks (Oilers lead 1-0)

Time: 10:30 p.m. ET

Network: NBCSN (Stream online here)

Check out the highlights from Edmonton’s 5-3 win in Game 1.

PHT Morning Skate: David Letterman shows off awesome playoff beard at Caps-Pens game

1 Comment

–We’ll start with highlights from Game 1 of the highly anticipated matchup between Washington and Pittsburgh, which the Penguins won 3-2. Sidney Crosby scored twice, while Alex Ovechkin found the back of the net once.

–It appears as though hockey fans in Montreal still aren’t thrilled about P.K. Subban being shipped to Nashville last summer. But what if they had kept Subban? Would they still be alive this postseason? Sportsnet’s Andrew Berkshire says we can’t know for sure, but there’s at least a chance the Canadiens would still be playing in they had Subban instead of Weber. (Sportsnet)

–Speaking of trades that happened last off-season, The Hockey News’ Ken Campbell writes that we shouldn’t be quick to appoint winners and losers of last year’s major trades (Subban to Nashville for Weber, Adam Larsson to Edmonton for Taylor Hall). Campbell writes: “We rush to judge. That’s what we do. Guilty, by the way. So when Adam Larsson has the night of his life in the Oilers Game 1 win over the Anaheim Ducks, the low-hanging fruit gets picked and Larsson becomes everything to the Oilers that Taylor Hall was not. It’s not terribly fair to the guys who were on the other side of the trade, but you pretty much sign up for that kind of scrutiny when you become a part of the NHL Millionaires Club.” (The Hockey News)

–Goalies like Jake Allen, Pekka Rinne and Henrik Lundqvist all turned in spectacular performances in the first round of this year’s playoffs. So Yahoo’s Puck Daddy blog takes a deeper look at eight goalies that have stolen a playoff series. Vintage J.S. Giguere was fun to watch! (Yahoo)

–Caps defenseman Brooks Orpik is one of the few players that has been on both sides of the Caps-Pens rivalry, but how did it start? “It was Penguins-Flyers when I started. Then when Sid and Ovi came, that’s two of the marquee names. I think that rivalry was manufactured a little bit, especially when we weren’t even in the same division and didn’t play each other in the playoffs until ‘09. A lot of that, I think, was hyped up for TV ratings. But at the same time those guys always seemed to kick it up a notch when they played each other, so it was fun to be a part of. (Sports Illustrated)

–Political speechwriter Stephen Krupin wrote and agreed with many of Barack Obama’s speeches, but there was one he wrote that he just couldn’t get on board with. You see, Krupin is a big Washington Capitals fan, so when the Penguins came to the White House after their Stanley Cup triumph, he had to write a nice speech about his team’s biggest rival. “As with any good speech, the process began with research. I clenched my jaw and read recaps of the Penguins’ remarkable turnaround season. I grew nauseous as I dug through fawning profiles about enemies of the state such as Matt Murray and accomplices such as Phil Kessel.” (Washington Post)

–David Letterman was at last night’s game between the Capitals and Penguins, and he was sporting a pretty impressive playoff beard. See for yourself:

Ovechkin shrugs off Caps’ Game 1 loss in very Ovechkin way

14 Comments

You know, it happens. Maybe not always in those exact words.

The Washington Capitals carried the play during portions of their 3-2 Game 1 loss to the Pittsburgh Penguins, and even down 1-0 in the series, just about every player seemed happy with their overall game.

(Granted, Braden Holtby picked apart two of the three goals he allowed, and so on.)

Still, Alex Ovechkin shrugged off the disappointment in a way that wasn’t quite Rated R, but probably ranks in the PG-13 range:

The penalty element is interesting, though.

When asked after the loss about the lack of power plays, Matt Niskanen merely offered a “no comment.”

The Penguins experienced some sprawling moments, yet they avoided taking a penalty each time. Often, when a team carries long sequences of play, they’ll go on the PP (especially with home-ice advantage) … but not the Capitals in Game 1.

via Natural Stat Trick

It’s a situation to watch as the Capitals hope to even the series against the Penguins with Game 2 coming on Saturday at 8 p.m. ET on NBC. (You can watch online, via the NBC Sports App and follow the livestream here).