Mike Commodore, Cam Barker, and Sheldon Souray all waived today to be bought out

3 Comments

With noontime having passed and the league’s buyout period coming to an end at 5 p.m. today, it was the final day to put players on waivers for the purpose of buying them out of their contracts. Once the clock struck 12 noon, the word came down, this time courtesy of TSN’s Bob McKenzie that three defensemen would hit the waiver wire to be eligible to be bought out.

McKenzie tweeted that Edmonton’s Sheldon Souray, Columbus’ Mike Commodore, and Minnesota’s Cam Barker were all unconditionally waived by their teams. They’ll be on waivers for the next 24 hours and if another team doesn’t pick them up, they’ll become unrestricted free agents.

For all three of them, last season proved to be a struggle. For Souray, he was buried in the AHL by the Oilers with the Capitals farm team in Hershey as they didn’t want him around any of their prospects. Their parting is long overdue and the fat contract they gave to Souray back in 2007 sits as one filled with injury and now bad feelings. With one year remaining on his deal, his buy out will be paid out over the next two seasons with a cap hit of $2.4 million this year and $1.5 million next year according to CapGeek.

Mike Commodore’s situation in Columbus was similarly difficult. Commodore didn’t see eye-to-eye with coach Scott Arniel and struggled to get ice time with the Blue Jackets who had defensive issues all season. With those kinds of problems and when you’re not getting a chance to help fix them, that means things are going rather poorly.

Commodore was sent to the Jackets’ AHL team in Springfield for most of the year and was put on waivers a couple of times to see if teams would snag him. No one ever bit and Commodore stayed in the AHL to languish.  Commodore’s contract has two years left which means his buy out will be paid out over the next four years with a cap hit against the Blue Jackets in the range of just over $1 million per year according to CapGeek.

  • 2011-12: $1,391,667
  • 2012-13: $1,541,667
  • 2013-14: $1,141,667
  • 2014-15: $1,141,667

Cam Barker’s tenure in Minnesota was a brutal one. After coming to the Wild in the deal that saw Nick Leddy and Kim Johnsson sent to Chicago, Barker was seen as the “sure thing” in that deal. After a year and a half in Minnesota, Barker’s struggles have made it so that he’s worn out his welcome in St. Paul and the Wild are moving on without him.

In 71 games with the Wild, Barker had two goals and ten assists and was a -12 defenseman. He was known more for his turnovers and poor coverage than he was anything else and now the Wild are eager to let him go. That trade involving Nick Leddy might go down in infamy in Minnesota when it’s all said and done. With just one year left on his deal, it’ll take two years to get the buyout hit off the Wild’s salary cap. With Barker being 25 when being bought out the buyout is for 1/3 of his cap hit meaning that the $1.083 million cost is spread out over two years. CapGeek breaks down the minimal pain felt by Minnesota for the buyout.

With these three guys likely hitting unrestricted free agency on Friday afternoon, things get a little bit more interesting as all three will likely see some interest from teams. With the defensive market getting thinned out leading up to Friday’s free agency frenzy, the buyouts could be a blessing in disguise for them as they’ll be free to pursue a deal with a team that wants them around now. They may not be the lucrative deals they’re coming off of, but at the least they should be able to get back to the NHL or find a comfortable place to fix their game.

Talbot torments Ducks as Oilers take 2-0 series lead

2 Comments

Those who vehemently argued for Cam Talbot being a Vezina finalist likely felt vindicated tonight (even if postseason results don’t factor into the voting).

In Game 1, Leon Draisaitl stole the show. Talbot was the standout of Game 2, snubbing a steady Ducks threat as Edmonton won 2-1 on Friday.

And, just like that, the Oilers are up 2-0 in their second-round series against the Anaheim Ducks. Better yet for this young group: the venue shifts to what’s likely to be a rowdy scene in Edmonton for Games 3 and 4.

The tone was set when Andrej Sekera scored just 65 seconds into the contest. That said, the Oilers could have sulked when a would-be 2-0 goal was called off (and they had to kill a penalty). Instead, they just kept battling, even after Jakob Silfverberg ended Talbot’s shutout bit with a laser beam on the power play.

Speaking of the power play, the Oilers managed to match the Ducks (1-for-4 each on the PP), even as Talbot faced 12 shots on goal during Anaheim’s power-play opportunities.

Talbot ultimately made 39 of 40 stops, and while the Ducks kept Connor McDavid from scoring, number 97 sure looked speedy and dangerous at times in Game 2.

Anaheim came into the second round with home-ice advantage through the West side of the playoffs, seemingly enjoying a golden opportunity when other conference powers fell. Instead, it’s looking like the Oilers might just have a chance to prove that they’re big-time contenders, too.

Game 3 airs on NBCSN at 7 p.m. ET on Sunday. You can watch online and via the NBC Sports App; click here for the livestream.

Latest goalie interference mess: Oilers get penalty, not goal

2 Comments

Ah, goalie interference. Does the fun ever start?

Arguably the most irritating facet of the 2017 Stanley Cup Playoffs reared its pesky head once again on Friday, as the Edmonton Oilers saw a would-be 2-0 goal disallowed in the first period of Game 2 against the Anaheim Ducks.

The goal wasn’t just disallowed, either, as Mark Letestu was given a minor penalty.

One would imagine that there are opinions for or against the goal (and penalty counting); there are also many who are just getting a little worn out by the uncertainty surrounding such calls. Tomas Holmstrom is nodding his head so hard right now, everyone.

Here’s one unhappy take:

Moments after this post went up, the Oilers made it 2-0 for real this time. Check out the game here.

Math may help build Vegas Knights, but biggest aim is not being boring

Getty
Leave a comment

Unlike Pierre Dorion, it sounds like Vegas Golden Knights GM George McPhee would rather listen to analytics-minded people rather than … you know, hit them.

As McPhee readies for the expansion draft, he told The Star’s Kevin McGran in Q&A that they’ll at least be factored into decisions.

I’ve been really fascinated by how revealing that data can be. You have these kids speaking a different language. But I’m convinced it has a really important place in this game. You have to pay attention to it, and you have to use it.

Naturally, the real question with McPhee and other executives comes down to how much they will lean on analytics. Some teams seem to pick and choose when to listen to such voices, ending up with an odd mix of moves that please and unnerve the “fancy stats” community.

Owner Bill Foley gave a good idea of how much they’ll lean on stats vs. more traditional approaches in an interview with the Vegas Hockey Hotline back in February, which was transcribed by The Hockey Writers’ Keith Scheessele.

“Analytics is not going to drive how we draft,” Foley said. “Analytics are going to supplement what the scouts are seeing. We’re going to rely on the scouts and what they recommend.”

(Foley also spoke of rating players in 10 different categories, which started to make one think about how old sports video games could only quantify skills in so many ways. Anyway …)

So, it sounds like McPhee & Co. will take a modern approach – a mixture of the old and the new – rather than going full-on bold and revolutionary like, say, the Cleveland Browns or Golden State Warriors.

Considering the mystery of roster quality one faces with the Vegas Knights, it honestly might be most important that McPhee is repeatedly stating that he doesn’t aim to put together a boring hockey team.

Hey, if it takes a while to be good, at least the Vegas Knights might fit with their environment and put on a show.

Tarasenko’s two goals help Blues tie series with Predators

3 Comments

One of the (many) remarkable things about the St. Louis Blues dispatching the Minnesota Wild was that they didn’t need a ton of production from Vladimir Tarasenko. He didn’t score a goal until the clinching game of that series.

The Blues needed more from him tonight, and he responded with two huge goals to help St. Louis win 3-2 in Game 2, tying the second-round series at 1-1.

Tarasenko scored the opening goal on that major power-play opportunity from the Vernon Fiddler knee on Colton Parayko, while Joel Edmundson wisely got out of the way to let Tarasenko nab the game-winner.

That ended up being the decisive factor as the Nashville Predators finally lost their first game of the postseason.

St. Louis must be breathing a sigh of relief for a number of reasons. The series shifts to Nashville for Games 3 and 4, so going down 2-0 might have been lethal.

Even beyond that, the Blues had some breaks go their way that likely won’t repeat to the same degree in future contests. The Predators didn’t receive a single power-play opportunity while St. Louis spent significant chunks of the contest on the man advantage, going 1-for-5 (but again, that includes a major).

The Blues also won despite what must have been a frustrating start. They only managed a 1-1 tie after the first 20 minutes despite holding Nashville to a mere three shots on goal.

The Predators also managed leads of 1-0 and 2-1, yet the Blues kept fighting to get back in this series. Game 3 will air on NBC at 3 p.m. ET on Sunday. You can watch online and via the NBC Sports App (Click here for the livestream link).

* – That said, he made a lot of commotion to set up Edmundson’s overtime game-winner from Game 1. That connection continued on Friday, as you likely noticed.