Colin Campbell

Canucks columnist preemptively fires up conspiracy talk relating to Colin Campbell and Bruins

4 Comments

It certainly didn’t take long for one of the Vancouver media scribes to take a leap of faith into the abyss of foolish column writing ahead of the Stanley Cup finals.

With everything we’ve seen this postseason involving officiating (and it’s been pretty good for the most part) the last thing we’d think would be on anyone’s minds would be the potential for questionable officiating in the Stanley Cup finals. Of course, with the Bruins being involved and Gregory Campbell being a Bruins starter, as well as son of Colin Campbell from the NHL front office, it makes some people in Vancouver get a bit curious.

After all, the season got off to a roaring start with Colin Campbell’s email scandal in which he sent messages to then head of officiating (and once again on-ice official) Stephen Walkom looking to make sure certain referees kept an eye out for current (and injured) Bruins star forward Marc Savard being “the biggest faker going” while similarly berating officials for not getting calls right regarding his son’s play. While Bruins fans were a bit up in arms about that at the start of the year, Vancouver media has seized the attention the other way now that Campbell’s son Greg plays for the Bruins.

Enter The Province’s Tony Gallagher. Gallagher got his thoughts out about the potential for officiating shenanigans to come out in the Stanley Cup finals thanks to Colin’s job with the league and his son’s spot on the Bruins roster. Commence the hysterics, Tony.

For each round in the playoffs a referee works, he gets an extra $18,000 over and above his yearly salary. For a linesman it’s $12,000. So if you please the powers that be, you work lots. If you don’t please them for whatever reason, you don’t get to work in the playoffs. The officials working the final are the guys the league thinks are the best and as we’ve seen from the exchange of leaked memos a while back, Campbell can often be involved in those discussions.

And make no mistake, we’re not talking about any communication between these respective parties at any time. There’s no conspiracy. The officials know what their bosses need and know how to please them.

Now any official who happens to displease the powers for whatever reason—serious mistakes we’d like to believe—could find himself not working the final all of a sudden (although that wouldn’t affect his pay this year) and his employment considerations for the future would be open to question. Maybe he gets no playoff work the following year. Maybe it could be so serious that his contract might be re-considered in the future. The bottom line is these guys in the hockey operations department—of which one is the father of one of the games’ participants– control every aspect of an official’s employment.

No, no conflict of interest here.

Sigh.

These are concerns we raised earlier in the year (and often aside from that as well) when the email scandal broke loose but some of the crazy things to keep in mind here so as to fully debunk this nonsense are simple.

First, Campbell doesn’t rule on matters involving the Bruins because of his son’s spot on the roster. Mike Murphy handles all things that involve the Bruins when it comes to disciplinary matters. We’d like to assume this also extends to referee assignments in the playoffs. If Colin Campbell has a “hit squad” of guys he knows he can influence, it frankly doesn’t matter as it’s (likely) Murphy’s call to pick who does the games.

Secondly, if you really think Campbell has it out for Vancouver, remember that Campbell played for two seasons with the Canucks from 1980-1982 including a Stanley Cup finals appearance in 1982 against the Islanders. If anyone knows best as to how much a Stanley Cup for Vancouver would mean to the fans it’s Campbell from his days playing at Pacific Coliseum.

Finally, if you’re that desperate for a tinfoil hat conspiracy in the Stanley Cup finals you’re going to find something to latch on to when/if things go sour for your team whether you’re a Bruins or Canucks fan. Officials, ice quality, vendor food, weather… Anything will do for those who want to be their own version of the X-Files. Would you rather sit back and enjoy the hockey or be a part of the rambling lunatic fringe? You know what the right choice is.

While Campbell’s email scandal and how he handled himself when confronted that should still be addressed in some way in the offseason, it’s not going to play a part in how these teams loaded with talented professionals conduct themselves on the ice. Believing that the league is rigging things in favor of any team or against a country (in some Canadian fans’ minds) is the sort of thing better left to fans of other sports that go wild with such talk.

‘If he was in Toronto, there’d be no Carey Price, media-wise’ – Boudreau on Dubnyk

Leave a comment

The Minnesota Wild aren’t exactly dominating the NHL, so it might be easy to ignore just how outstanding Devan Dubnyk has been to start the 2016-17 season.

We’re talking “Carey Price and Tuukka Rask territory.”

While his 11-6-3 record won’t blow anyone’s mind, his 1.65 GAA and .946 save percentage are jaw-dropping. With Dubnyk doing special things, Bruce Boudreau felt the need to say weird things* after Dubnyk helped the Wild beat the Toronto Maple Leafs 3-2 on Wednesday.

“If he was in Toronto, there would be no Carey Price … I’m just saying media-wise,” Boudreau said after the game, as you can see in this video:

That’s some Haagen-Daz level praise from Boudreau.

Even if Dubnyk was in a bigger market, there’d probably be room in our hockey thoughts for Dubnyk and the consensus best goalie in the world, but Boudreau’s larger point is taken: Dubnyk has been right there with the best early on this season.

And, let’s be honest, we shouldn’t be too hard on Boudreau or he might stop saying … well, things like this:

Never change, Bruce.

* – Unlike his comments about “Die Hard,” which were amusingly on-point.

Trademark headaches for the Vegas Golden Knights?

LAS VEGAS, NV - NOVEMBER 22:  The team name and logo for the Vegas Golden Knights are displayed on T-Mobile Arena's video mesh wall after the Vegas Golden Knights was announced as the name for the Las Vegas NHL franchise at T-Mobile Arena on November 22, 2016 in Las Vegas, Nevada. The team will begin play in the 2017-18 season.  (Photo by Ethan Miller/Getty Images)
Getty
1 Comment

It’s difficult to tell just how big of a headache this might be, but SBNation‘s Mary Clarke uncovered quite the eyebrow-raiser on Wednesday: the Vegas Golden Knights’ trademark request was rejected by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

You can read the 164-page document here (if you’re weird), but the gist is that “registration of the applied-for mark is refused because of a likelihood of confusion with the mark” used by the College of Saint Rose Golden Knights.

Clarke summarized it simply enough:

Essentially, the logos and stylizations are too similar. It’s baffling the NHL and Vegas didn’t go through the trademark process before announcing the name and logo last month. Yet, all is not lost. Later down, the document states the Black Knight Sports and Entertainment group “may respond to the refusal by submitting evidence and arguments in support of registration.”

Sports Illustrated’s Alex Prewitt received this release from the Vegas Golden Knights, which indicated that they will respond to the refusal (and also noted how teams like the Boston Bruins and UCLA Bruins share names without issues).

There seem to be some mixed messages, at least if you note owner Bill Foley’s response to NBC Las Vegas’ Amber Dixon:

Hmm.

This could merely be a messy issue that really doesn’t cause anything to go off track, even if people are certainly having some fun at the league and team’s expense.

The logo and other marks seem to be the biggest sticking point, so compare the two for yourself:

Again, this could all be a mild disruption, but it’s an odd situation. And, to some, a great laugh.

Related: There also might be some issues involving the Army.

Capitals manage OT win after coughing up lead to Bruins

Leave a comment

It wasn’t pretty, and they might have lost key defenseman Matt Niskanen to injury, but at least the Washington Capitals managed a win against the Boston Bruins.

For a while, it was looking pretty ugly.

After going up 3-0, the Capitals went more than a period’s worth of time without even managing a shot on goal. Whether you lean more toward giving the Bruins credit for fighting back or beating up the Capitals for “sitting on a lead,” it’s staggering that such a dangerous offense could be held in check for so long.

Luckily for Washington, Nicklas Backstrom salvaged the night with an overtime goal to give the Capitals a 4-3 overtime win.

Both teams have had a knack for extending games beyond regulation lately, by the way:

Capitals over the last three games:
Shootout loss to the Lightning
Overtime win against the Sabres
Overtime win tonight against the Bruins

Bruins over the last five games:
Shootout loss against Flyers
Shootout win against Hurricanes
Regulation win against Sabres
Overtime win against Panthers
Overtime loss to the Capitals

Maybe that’s what gets it done in 2016-17: finding ways to carve out wins and shake out rough patches, like the Caps did tonight.

Matt Niskanen injured by Patrice Bergeron boarding hit

4 Comments

Patrice Bergeron doesn’t have a reputation for dirty hits, but he drew the Washington Capitals’ ire for a hit on Matt Niskanen.

The Capitals consider Niskanen “probable” to return to Wednesday’s game against the Boston Bruins with what they’re calling an upper-body injury. Bergeron received a two-minute boarding penalty for the infraction.

(Check out video of the hit above.)

The Capitals’ Twitter acknowledged the brewing bad feelings.

Does Bergeron deserve supplemental discipline for that boarding hit?

Update: The Capitals won the game 4-3 in overtime, but Niskanen did not return. Click here for more on the Caps’ victory.