Boston Bruins v Tampa Bay Lightning - Game Six

Five Thoughts: Game 6 tossed everything out the window to help set up Game 7

3 Comments

Right when you think you’ve learned everything about the playoffs as well as about Boston and Tampa Bay, Game 6 goes on ahead and happens. Trends were busted, stars played like stars, goaltending evaporated with the defense. If nothing else, this series is proving to be fun that way, but with Tampa Bay forcing a Game 7 all bets are off on Friday night.

1. We mentioned a bit yesterday in our piece about the Lightning’s “concerns” about having Eric Furlatt officiating Game 6 about how the Lightning power play was disturbingly quiet since Game 2. While Furlatt and Kelly Sutherland still called more penalties on Tampa Bay than Boston (five to four) the Lightning power play reappeared in a big way going 3-4 on the man advantage including seeing a prototypical goal from Steve Stamkos.

It’s tough to say whether or not Guy Boucher’s gamesmanship paid off, but the motivation it may have served to get his power play focused and ready to cash in when they did get opportunities certainly worked. After the game, Claude Julien bristled about Boucher’s means of gaining an edge but the only thing Julien’s got to be mad about is the failure of his penalty kill to contain the Lightning attack. That doesn’t mean we won’t see any more similar gamesman-like tactics from both coaches Friday’s Game 7.

2. It’s something else to see how hot and cold both of these teams have shown themselves to be throughout this series. We’ve seen a pair of rather down and out games from Tampa Bay where Tim Thomas’ stellar play and tough Bruins defense wore them down. Then we’ve got games like last night’s where the Lightning are able to score all over the place and get their power play cranking the way we’ve seen it do throughout the playoffs.

The same goes for the Bruins as we’ve seen them dominate with defense and by getting ahead in games early. Then there’s games like last night where their defense looks toothless and Thomas ends up trying too hard to cover for their lax effort. Game 6 proved to be a healthy mix of all things that went wrong for both teams and in the end it was Tampa that cashed in more often.

3. While the Bruins got a big night out of their top line with David Krejci netting a hat trick and Milan Lucic ripping a laser by Dwayne Roloson, the rest of the forward lines were disturbingly quiet. When you’re able to get all those guys going as well as getting a pair of assists out of Tomas Kaberle on top of it all, that’s a game the Bruins feel like they have to win. Not getting added production from the likes of Patrice Bergeron shows how tenuous the Bruins success can be if they’re not all clicking together.

4. Tim Thomas is going to take heat for giving up five goals in Game 6 but after watching and re-watching the videos of the goals Tampa Bay scored, it might make sense to get on the case of his defense and support for putting him in some difficult positions. With Tampa Bay scoring three times on the power play, that makes a night tough enough but Johnny Boychuk is the guy that should get zeroed in on.

Boychuk was on the ice for all five goals against and made brutal coverage mistakes on three of those goals. Boychuk’s been strong for most of the series, but he was brutal in Game 6 and Martin St. Louis’ goal that proved to be the game winner saw Boychuk pinched in too deep leading to a two-on-one break for St. Louis and Downie that saw Thomas play more of the part of defenseman than goalie. Lapses like that are killers and Boychuk had one too many of them.

5. Now it’s all down to a Game 7. Ideally you’d like to think with the Bruins going home for that they’ll have an advantage but with how the Lightning find ways to adjust to situations and with the sort of support help they’re getting, there’s every reason to think they have a chance to make the Stanley Cup finals as well.

After all, it’s not all about Stamkos, St. Louis, and Vincent Lecavalier. Now it’s about Teddy Purcell (who scored two more goals in Game 6), Simon Gagne, and Steve Downie as well. Being able to roll out two steady offensive lines like that as well as a gnarly third line like they’ve got with Dominic Moore and Nate Thompson.

It’s one game to decide who gets to go to the Stanley Cup finals and with both teams likely pulling out all the stops means nothing but good things or us fans. It seems only right that these two go to seven games, but both teams both went seven in the first round and now they’re going seven again. It’s asking a lot of both teams but we’re sure of only one thing: Vancouver couldn’t be happier to see things break down this way.

NHL says it isn’t bothered by Coyotes’ salary cap methods

PHILADELPHIA - JUNE 02:  Dave Bolland #36 of the Chicago Blackhawks and Chris Pronger #20 of the Philadelphia Flyers skate after the loose puck in Game Three of the 2010 NHL Stanley Cup Final at Wachovia Center on June 2, 2010 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.  (Photo by Bruce Bennett/Getty Images)
Getty
1 Comment

Arizona Coyotes GM John Chayka is deftly playing the system when it comes to the salary cap to the point that some might accuse him of exploiting loopholes.

If the NHL bristles as such tactics, they’re at least not showing it in public.

In taking on the absolutely dead money of Chris Pronger and Pavel Datsyuk along with the possibly dead money of Dave Bolland, the Coyotes are getting to the cap floor while saving money in the actual cash they’re dishing out.

The Score’s Ian MacLaren succinctly explains the savings they’re enjoying thanks to these clever trades:

That’s how the league is viewing Arizona taking on the salaries of Chris Pronger, Pavel Datsyuk and Dave Bolland. The cap hits amount to almost $18 million but result in less than $2 million in actual salary paid out by the club, while simultaneously allowing it to reach the cap floor.

Honestly, it’s difficult to shake the image of Gary Bettman & Co. bristling at the tactics of a franchise they’ve defended year after year amid myriad arena issues.

Today’s Slapshot’s Craig Morgan caught up with Bill Daly, whose overall message is that the league is OK with what Arizona is doing.

“I would say that it’s a matter that we monitor, like all other areas of the CBA (collective bargaining agreement), and if we believe it starts to be abused in a way that is inconsistent with how the system is designed to work, at that point, we would try to correct it in collective bargaining with the union,” Daly said. “I would say we aren’t at that point on this issue — we do not view it as the loophole that‎ some describe it as.”

One key point from Daly is that he doesn’t view Bolland’s case as the same as that of Pronger or Datsyuk. The critical distinction is that Bolland at least hopes to become healthy enough to play again.

(Chakya’s update wasn’t particularly optimistic in that regard, but a return isn’t totally inconceivable since Bolland is just 30.)

Best of both worlds for Coyotes

Again, the Coyotes are really reaping the benefits of this gameplan. Not only are they saving real dollars by absorbing other teams’ dead money, they’re using those trades to acquire promising assets like Jakob Chychrun and Lawson Crouse.

These are the sort of moves that make the team look bright today and possibly terrifying for opponents in the future, even if the 2016-17 product may be a little hit-or-miss.

Time may tell how the NHL truly feels

To some extent, we probably won’t know how the NHL truly feels about this situation until the next CBA eventually gets hashed out.

Then again, the league did make a big stink about cap circumvention during the memorable days of Ilya Kovalchuk’s contract negotiations, so perhaps such maneuvering really doesn’t bother the NHL?

Maybe, but you’re free to picture Bettman grumbling about Chayka’s moves either way.

(H/T to the Score.)

Alex Ovechkin tweets about tying the knot with Nastya Shubskaya

viaovechkin
via Alex Ovechkin's Twitter page
Leave a comment

Alex Ovechkin shared the news via his official Twitter feed that he married Nastya Shubskaya.

His message includes a caption that translates to “This is happiness,” according to NHL.com.

Washington Capitals blog Russian Machine Never Breaks indicated that the two got married during a small, private ceremony, so it might have actually happened a week or so ago.

Here’s the Ovechkin tweet from Sunday:

This continues a run of big news for Capitals players, with a life-changing event for Ovechkin’s partner-in-crime Nicklas Backstrom as well:

There were some fun jokes on Twitter about the happy news, with this one possibly taking the cake:

This summer figures to be a busy one from a hockey standpoint for Ovie, as he’s been part of various activities and will represent Russia at the upcoming 2016 World Cup of Hockey.

In case you’re wondering, Ovechkin will soon turn 31.

Martin Jones is still pretty ‘new’ to this

SAN JOSE, CA - JUNE 06:  Martin Jones #31 of the San Jose Sharks stands in goal against the Pittsburgh Penguins in Game Four of the 2016 NHL Stanley Cup Final at SAP Center on June 6, 2016 in San Jose, California.  (Photo by Bruce Bennett/Getty Images)
Getty
Leave a comment

You’d have to be an awfully harsh critic not to be impressed with what Martin Jones did last season.

He “didn’t flinch” under the pressure of a run to the 2016 Stanley Cup Final. San Jose Sharks head coach Peter DeBoer described his efforts as some of the best championship round work of “all-time.”

His signing really made the Sharks look smart. With a strong .919 career save percentage in the regular season and a fantastic .923 playoff save percentage, the 26-year-old has succeeded more or less whenever called upon.

That brings us to the interesting part, though: there’s not a lot of tape, so to speak, on Jones as an NHL goalie.

Small sample

The 2015-16 season was just his third of NHL action, and he’s now at just 99 regular season appearances. That fantastic run of 24 playoff games makes up a significant chunk of his overall experience at the top level.

Jones has excelled when tested, but if you have any concern with him, it’s just that he’s relatively inexperienced at carrying that No. 1 workload.

He started in 65 games during the 2015-16 season, towering over his work as a Kings backup (15 appearances in 2014-15, 19 in 2013-14).

On the bright side, the Sharks have additional evidence that he’s not just a flash in the pan.

Strong numbers at each level

Looking at his AHL stats and even going as far back as his WHL days, his numbers have almost always been good to downright impressive.

It all continues the pattern of Jones looking like the real deal, but next season presents the latest test for the promising goalie.

So far, he’s passed all of them with flying colors.

What will Brent Burns’ new contract look like?

SAN JOSE, CA - FEBRUARY 29:  Brent Burns #88 of the San Jose Sharks celebrates after scoring a goal in the second period against the Montreal Canadiens at SAP Center on February 29, 2016 in San Jose, California.  (Photo by Ezra Shaw/Getty Images)
Getty Images
2 Comments

This is part of Sharks day at PHT…

There’s only one Brent Burns, that much is clear. Both on and off the ice, there’s no one like him.

So, what do you pay a guy that’s always imitated, never duplicated?

That’s the dilemma the San Jose Sharks will be faced with in the coming weeks/months.

If you were impressed with Bruns’ 17 goals and 60 points in 2014-15, then his 27 goals and 75 points in 2015-16 was out of this world.

Over the last three seasons, not many forwards have produced as much as Burns, let alone defensemen.

Since being acquired by San Jose in 2011, Burns has hit double digit goals in all but one year (he scored nine in 30 games in 2012-13).

“You know how we feel about Brent. Phenomenal year,” GM Doug Wilson said back in June. “When we acquired him it was a big piece to acquire. There’s no doubt he’s important to us. We want him. I think he loves being here. Those conversations will take place shortly.”

Time to talk numbers…

It sounds like Burns enjoy playing in San Jose, so him taking a bit of a discount is possible. But if we look at the closest comparable…

Dustin Byfuglien, who is 31-years-old like Burns, signed a five-year $38 million contract with the Jets this winter. That comes out to an AAV of $7.6 million.

Both are big, physically imposing and have put up some great numbers in the last few years.

Over the last three seasons, Byfuglien has scored 19, 18 and 20 goals for a total of 57. Burns has scored 27, 17 and 22 for a total of 66.

That’s not a huge difference over three years, but Byfuglien wasn’t coming off a 27-goal season and a trip to the Stanley Cup Final when he signed his contract.

Although we haven’t really heard much regarding Burns’ contract demands, it wouldn’t be shocking for the final cap number to be in the 8 or 9 million range.