Philadelphia Flyers v Boston Bruins - Game Four

What Went Wrong: Philadelphia Flyers

4 Comments

It’s not the finish to the season the Flyers were aiming for after surprisingly making the Stanley Cup final last year. Finishing as the second seed in the Eastern Conference this year meant that the Flyers had high hopes of returning to the Cup final and winning their first Cup since 1975. Instead, they met the business end of a broom thanks to the Bruins and they’re left to wonder what exactly went wrong.

Don’t worry guys, we’ll take care of that.

1. Yes, the goaltending stunk
Let’s just point and laugh at the elephant in the room right now. Goaltending was terrible. Take a look at Brian Boucher’s numbers in this series.

5.26 goals against average, .846 save percentage, 12 goals allowed on 78 shots.

Those numbers are indefensible when breaking things down. Starting Sergei Bobrovsky in Game 4 was a move Peter Laviolette had to try to turn things around. Unfortunately for him, the series was already over with because the Flyers had a lot of other problems elsewhere on the ice on top of being terrible in goal. With no one having any confidence in anyone out there, it’s tough to come up with great performances in goal. Game 2 was the Flyers only real shot at a win and they still came up short in overtime. The other three losses weren’t even close.

2. But so did the defense
Philly’s defense was also to fault for their problems. We’ve yelled about how the Bruins plan of attack flustered the Flyers and made them run around wildly in their own end chasing after pucks and players all at once. Not having a healthy Chris Pronger to lead them did make a difference, but with the margin of defeat the Flyers were losing by it didn’t much matter. The Flyers defense being in the shape it was in caused a domino effect. All season long the Flyers goalies, regardless of who was in net, all put up similar numbers and relied on the guys in front of them to help make life easier. The Bruins figured out that by pressing the play and pressuring the Flyers in all zones that they’d get them to break down and leave openings all over the ice. They did that and it happened a lot to the tune of 20 goals in four games. Giving up an average of five goals per game isn’t winning anyone anything.

3. And the offense was brutal too
For as many goals as the Flyers were giving up to Boston, they had a problem of their own in that they couldn’t score either. Tim Thomas was outstanding through the series as the Flyers threw an average of just over 37 shots per game at him. 149 shots in all in the series and Thomas allowed just seven goals. That’t tough to keep up with but the Flyers needed their top players to flat out be better. Daniel Briere disappeared against Boston as did Mike Richards and Claude Giroux. James van Riemsdyk was the lone Flyer player to do anything in this series as he scored three of the team’s seven goals. You need the full team to put it together to beat the Bruins and the Flyers, instead, had one guy consistently bringing it. The Flyers had more than a few glaring issues in this series, but the lack of goals flew under the radar thanks how bad everything else went.

4. No character either
We’re not really big fans of putting a stake on intangible things like “heart” and “pride” but this Flyers team seemed to truly lack any of that against Boston. After getting pushed to the brink by Buffalo in the first round and showing some of that classic Flyers swagger, they had none of that against the Bruins. Instead, you had players taking dumb penalties (like Dan Carcillo did in Game 4), Chris Pronger lashing out in Game 1 while ending up a -3, and Scott Hartnell going after Zdeno Chara only to turtle after getting Chara’s ire showed that the Flyers just lacked something to unite them against a very motivated Bruins team. It’s not the brand of Flyers hockey we’ve gotten used to and perhaps next time around they’ll get a bit more out of Mike Richards as the captain.

***

Philadelphia is clearly a very talented team. There’s a lot of offensive firepower here that’s young and itching to break out in the future. From Ville Leino, James van Riemsdyk, and Claude Giroux that’s a fantastic array of young talent. A healthy Jeff Carter may have helped out more against Boston and with Mike Richards there’s no reason to be concerned about those parts of the Flyers lineup. All eyes will be on GM Paul Holmgren in the offseason to see if he addresses the team’s goaltending situation. The Flyers have skated by with average to poor goalies for far too long and those issues came home to roost in this series.

Sabres extend Larsson: one year, $950,000

BUFFALO, NY - JANUARY 22: Johan Larsson #22 of the Buffalo Sabres warms up before the game against the Detroit Red Wings on January 22, 2016 at the First Niagara Center in Buffalo, New York. (Photo by Tom Brenner/Getty Images)
Getty Images
Leave a comment

BUFFALO, N.Y. (AP) The Buffalo Sabres have re-signed forward Johan Larsson to a one-year contract.

Larsson was eligible to become a restricted free agent once his contract expired this summer. The Swedish-born player is coming off a season in which he set career bests with 10 goals, 17 points and 74 games. He also finished tied with rookie center Jack Eichel in scoring five game-winning goals.

Overall, he has 16 goals and 21 assists in 142 games for the Sabres.

Buffalo acquired Larsson in a trade that sent former Sabres captain Jason Pominville to Minnesota in April 2013. The Wild selected Larsson in the second round of the 2010 draft.

Contractual details, per the Buffalo News:

Burke: Once a team picks first overall, no more drafting first overall (for a few years at least)

Calgary Flames' President of Hockey Operations & acting GM, Brian Burke speaks to the media as team members show up for NHL hockey season-end activities in Calgary, Alberta, on Monday, April 14, 2014. (AP Photo/The Canadian Press, Larry MacDougal)
AP
7 Comments

Brian Burke isn’t trying to pick on the Edmonton Oilers — no really, he isn’t — but Calgary’s president of hockey ops doesn’t believe any team should get to draft first overall as much as his northern rivals have done the past few years.

“If you’re a team that picks first overall, you shouldn’t be allowed to pick first overall for some specified period … three years or five years, whatever … or even the top two teams, pick in the top two,” Burke told the Flames’ website.

“You could still pick four or five, still get a good player, but you can’t get rewarded for continued failure, or continued luck.”

The Oilers, of course, picked first overall in 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2015. And after yet another dismal season in 2015-16, they have a 13.5 percent of winning’s tomorrow’s lottery and getting the same privilege again

“Everyone thinks when you talk about the draft having flaws, that you’re picking on Edmonton,” said Burke.

“There are a lot of teams that have followed this path and have repeated high, high picks for a number of years. Chicago did it. Florida’s done it. Buffalo’s done it. You can argue we did it in Toronto, certainly by not any effort of ours. We were just not successful in the lottery. This is not an indictment of any one team and it’s not an indictment of the system.

“This is saying, ‘Okay, if 30 reasonable people got into a room and said, how do we best award amateur talent in the draft without having abuses,’ I’m not sure this is the system we’d come up with. That’s all I’m saying.”

And many would agree with Burke.

In fact, many would go a lot further, suggesting the entire system should be rethought.

But the question will remain, what’s a better system? The current one incentivizes losing, and so some teams tank. They may not use the word “tanking,” but they’re sure not trying to win. Not in the short term.

Now, is it a good look for the NHL when teams are built to be bad and we see fans openly rooting for losses? No, it’s not a good look.

But would it be preferable for each team to have the same odds of drafting first overall. Even the Stanley Cup champion?

Imagine for a moment a system that didn’t take the standings into account. You just know there’d be some poor franchise that was chronically unlucky, year after year after year. And you just know there’d be some ultra-lucky franchise, too.

The fact is, as long as the NHL wants to maintain its competitive balance — and remember, there’s nothing the NHL is prouder of than its precious parity — losing teams will be rewarded in the draft.

Burke is fine with that.

All he’s saying is the current system could use a few tweaks.

And if the Oilers win the lottery tomorrow, you can bet there’ll be some.

After firing Boudreau, Ducks GM unloads on core players

6 Comments

When the Ducks were struggling this season, GM Bob Murray took some not-so-thinly veiled shots at the team’s core players.

And after the club’s disappointing first-round playoff exit to Nashville, he was at it again.

The juicy stuff, from today’s presser following the Bruce Boudreau dismissal.

(Video here):

“Let’s face it: I’d like to know where they heck they were in Games 1 and 2. The players are going to have to answer that the next four or five days. Where were they? They showed up in Game 7, but where was the passion, the controlled emotion? Where the heck was that? They’re going to have to be held accountable, too.

“There’s definite concerns in that area, and I think the core has to be held responsible, and they have to be better. Maybe I haven’t been hard enough on them in the last few years, but they’re going to hear some different words this time.”

Murray then shared a few of those “different words” with the assembled media.

If you’re looking for one of the core guys Murray may be referring to, consider Corey Perry.

Having just wrapped the third of an eight-year, $69 million deal with a $8.625M cap hit (that’s a long-term contract, right?), Perry failed to score over the seven-game series against the Preds, and had a team-worst minus-7 rating.

Say what you will about the merits of plus-minus, but minus-7  is minus-7. It’s not good. Hard to see how it could be viewed positively.

Of course, there’s no doubt other core guys are in Murray’s crosshairs. But it’s not just about core guys making big money and failint to produce in crunch time. It’s also about core guys making big money, failing in crunch time and not going anywhere.

Because that affects the futures of the players around them.

Some of Murray’s anger — justifiably — comes with the long-terms deals he’s got on the books, and how they’ll likely hamstring the Ducks this summer. He’s already on record saying this will be an “interesting” offseasonHampus Lindholm, Sami Vatanen, Rickard Rakell and Frederik Andersen are all RFAs, and it’s quite conceivable one or two won’t be with back in Anaheim for the start of training camp.

Had the Ducks made a legit playoff run, it would’ve taken the sting away from (potentially) losing players.

But now?

Consider what Murray said about retaining Rakell, who finished fourth on the team in scoring.

“In keeping certain people, other people may have to go,” he explained, per the Associated Press. “That’s what you get forced into. A couple of big contracts get signed, and you end up following because that’s what you get pushed into, and that’s what they expect.

“We are all guilty of that.”

Blues, Capitals to play exhibition game in Kansas City

Pedestrians walk past the Sprint Center, Sunday, March 24, 2013, in Kansas City, Mo. The city was preparing for the third round of the NCAA college basketball tournament at the arena after the region received 6-10 inches of snow overnight. (AP Photo/Charlie Riedel)
AP
1 Comment

Kansas City is going to host another NHL exhibition game.

The St. Louis Blues announced today that they’ll take on the Washington Capitals on Oct. 5 at Sprint Center. Both Vladimir Tarasenko and Alexander Ovechkin will be there, at least according to the press release.

The Blues last played in K.C. a couple of years ago when they took on the Stars in exhibition play. In 2011, a sellout crowd watched the Penguins and Kings at Sprint Center.

A market once considered a candidate for expansion or relocation — particularly after Sprint Center opened in 2007 — the NHL-to-Kansas City buzz has since died down. Last year, there was no interest from Kansas City when the league called for expansion applications.

Sensing an opportunity to make their team a favorite of all Missourians, not just the ones in St. Louis, the Blues have said they’d like to cultivate their fan base across the state in Kansas City.