Roberto Luongo

Vancouver is struggling to maintain leads, but it’s not Roberto Luongo’s fault

Don’t blame the Vancouver Canucks for feeling good about themselves right now, although obviously they shouldn’t get too comfortable. Not after nearly coughing up a 3-0 series lead against the Chicago Blackhawks in the first round.

Warm-and-fuzzies aside, there are a few clouds in their sky.

Moving past the slightly worrisome play of the Sedin twins, the biggest concern could be the Canucks’ struggles holding onto leads. The Globe & Mail points out that the Canucks lead the NHL’s regular season with 100 third period goals, but lately, they’ve been far too happy to go in cruise control with leads. Vancouver Canucks blogger Alix Wright probably described it best on Twitter when she said, “The Canucks are AlainVigneaulting again.”

Rather than maintaining a high pace, high-pressure attack as a more offensively talented and dynamic team than the Nashville Predators, the Canucks elect to go into turtle mode and often find themselves in some nail-biters (including an overtime loss in Game 2).

The Globe & Mail seems to put most of the blame at the feet/pads of Roberto Luongo.

Twice this week against the Nashville Predators the Canucks let third-period leads slip away – both tying goals absolute groaners – and had to settle matters in overtime, losing once and winning once.

It happened again Thursday night when, up 2-1 heading into the third, yet another groaner – even if somewhat less egregious than the previous two – found its way between Roberto Luongo’s pads to tie a game in the final frame.

(snip)

The victory was gratifying, as Vancouver has been by far the better team, but the late goal simply raised, once again, that old bugaboo concerning Luongo – can he win the games that truly matter?

It is the albatross around his neck, the gorilla on his back, the animal inside his head. It is a cruel knock that he has never been allowed to shed – not even with a gold-medal victory in last year’s Olympics, when Sidney Crosby’s goal allowed the thousands of Luongo doubters to take their first breath since the puck dropped in overtime.

Luongo had his rough moments in the Chicago series, but he bounced back masterfully in Game 7 and has been an elite performer since then.

In the last five games – three of which went into overtime – Luongo earned one shutout, allowed just one goal twice and never yielded more than two in any single contest. Overall, he let seven goals past him in that five-game span, making 142 out of 149 saves in the process.

I’m not sure how much more media members and fans can ask from him. Should he start scoring goals on a line with the Sedin twins? Maybe cure a disease or invent a cheaper, more environmentally-friendly form of gasoline? Sure, there have been a few “groaners” but there isn’t a goalie in the world whose resume spotless.

It’s also probably important to note that, you know, the Canucks are winning even if it isn’t always pretty. Those “blown” leads haven’t resulted in many losses, so Vancouver fans shouldn’t go into panic mode just yet.

If anything, the Canucks should make a self-assessment about how the team functions with lead as a a whole. Sometimes people refer to tallies that provide a two or three-goal lead as “insurance goals,” but the only premium one needs to pay is the risk of allowing a goal against.

Considering the fact that they’re allowing them anyway, maybe that’s an adjustment the team could make as they approach even bigger games.

Latest way the Wild lost? Killed by penalty kill

Minnesota Wild goalie Devan Dubnyk sits on the ice after giving up a goal to St. Louis Blues' Jori Lehtera, of Finland, during the second period of an NHL hockey game Saturday, Feb. 6, 2016, in St. Louis. (AP Photo/Jeff Roberson)
AP
2 Comments

It’s said that variety is the spice of life, yet it seems to be the spite of the Minnesota Wild.

As head coach Mike Yeo said, this struggling team appears to find a new way to lose virtually every night. That couldn’t have happened once again on Saturday, when they fell 4-1 to the St. Louis Blues, could it?

Actually …

If you ask Jarret Stoll, the latest problem was the penalty kill.

Honestly, Stoll may have been too specific, likely trying to throw his own unit under the bus. Instead, it might be more accurate to say that Minnesota’s special teams let them down.

Indeed, the Wild struggled to limit the Blues’ power play, which went an unsettling 3-for-6. That said, Minnesota had a chance to trade blows with St. Louis. Instead, the Wild managed one power-play goal on seven opportunities.

The silver lining is that the Wild believe that they showed more fight than this fragile bunch had been generating before.

On the other hand, with Jonas Brodin on IR and Jared Spurgeon apparently hurt, that silver lining may not be so easy to see.

Statement in Blackhawks’ blowout of Stars? Coach Q says they’re even

7 Comments

Worry (if you’re pulling for the Stars) or gloat (if you’re a Blackhawks fan) all you want, but the bottom line is that the Central Division’s No.1 spot is clearly in Chicago’s control after Saturday night.

The Blackhawks earned a decisive 5-1 win against the Dallas Stars, giving them a five-point standings lead over Dallas for the Central Division lead.

You may feel like that’s more of the same, but consider this: things would look a lot closer if Dallas won or gained points, as they hold three games in hand on the ‘Hawks.

At least one Blackhawks player admits this game means a little more than your average W.

Indeed, while Antti Niemi was pulled from the game and Kari Lehtonen faced his own struggles in Dallas’ net, Corey Crawford ranked as one of the big reasons why the score was so lopsided.

(Artem Anisimov had a big say in that, too.)

As a wise coach with 1,000+ games of experience would do, Joel Quenneville didn’t go overboard in assessing the victory.

Was this a statement game? Who knows, but a certain statement is that the Blackhawks now have a five-point standings lead.

Brad Marchand wins it … on a penalty shot … in overtime

11 Comments

Looking at the standings, beating the Buffalo Sabres was pretty important for the Boston Bruins. The Atlantic Division’s run for spots appears particularly congested out East.

Of all the Bruins to get a chance to win it all, the team might have wanted Brad Marchand to have that opportunity. He’s on pace to destroy his previous career-highs for scoring, and Marchand’s been particularly hot lately.

Either way, Marchand came up big indeed, scoring the rare overtime game-winner on a penalty shot. Check out the drama below:

That can be a big extra point and ROW (regulation/overtime win) when the regular season is finished.

Note: Many believe that Marchand should not have received a penalty shot on the play.

Crosby kills the Cats: Penguins end Panthers’ winning streak

Pittsburgh Penguins' Sidney Crosby (87) collides with Florida Panthers' Connor Brickley (86) during the second period of an NHL hockey game in Pittsburgh, Tuesday, Oct. 20, 2015. (AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar)
AP
3 Comments

For quite some time, it looked like the Florida Panthers would keep the Pittsburgh Penguins under wraps.

Florida nursed a 1-0 lead into a 2-0 margin almost halfway through the third period, looking to win its sixth consecutive game. That looked great … and then Sidney Crosby + Kris Letang happened.

Let’s put it this way: this GIF of Crosby being frustrated is amusing, yet it doesn’t exactly tell the story of Saturday’s 3-2 overtime win for the Penguins:

Instead, Crosby grabbed his 900th point assisting on a Letang goal, and finished the night with 902 by collecting the game-tying goal and grabbing a helper on Letang’s overtime game-winner.

Crosby crossing that barrier is indeed special, even if it prompts “What if?” questions about No. 87’s health.

The resurgence of Crosby and Letang already played a big role in the Penguins going from disjointed and frustrating to sneaky and scary, so it  shouldn’t be that surprising to see them play so well. Doing so in such brisk order is a little bewildering, however.