New York Rangers v Washington Capitals - Game Five

What Went Wrong: New York Rangers


The problems the Rangers ran into in their series with the Washington Capitals are pretty apparent. When you get knocked out of the playoffs in five games, it’s easy to put a big circle around the areas where the Rangers just flat out weren’t better than the Capitals in at all. That’s not going to stop us from pointing them out one last time however. Here’s our list of things that went horribly wrong for the Rangers in the playoffs.

1. The terrible, horrible, no good, very bad power play
The Rangers had a lot of problems when on the man advantage. In 20 power play chances the Rangers scored just one goal, good for a 5% success rate. Stunningly, that’s better than two other teams in the post season (Pittsburgh at 4%, Boston at 0%) but unfortunately for the Rangers, they weren’t playing either of those teams. Without the power play producing, the Rangers offense wasn’t producing either as they scored just eight goals in five games. When you’re scoring that little against a team as good as Washington, you’re going to lose.

2. One grand missed opportunity
This might as well just be about Game 4 as that game turned out to be the make it or break it game of the series. The Rangers got the goals they were looking for getting out to a 3-0 lead before giving it all away in the third period and going on to lose in double overtime. With the Capitals holding a 2-1 series lead going into that game, a Rangers win in Game 4 would’ve changed the complexion of the series completely. Had the Rangers won, the pressure on Washington to not be chokey chokers would’ve been immense and doubt would’ve been cast on to their ability to win big games. Again. Instead, it’s a monumental collapse for New York and a heartbreaking defeat that turned Game 5 into a very loud funeral for the Rangers season.

3. Superstars playing too normal
Marian Gaborik was a no-show for New York. Sure he scored a goal in Game 4, but his overanxious play in double overtime turned into the game-winning goal for Washington. Brandon Dubinsky did about as well as you could expect given the circumstances but he had to play bigger. Being without Ryan Callahan didn’t help matters either. Defenseman Marc Staal’s main duty was shadowing Alex Ovechkin and considering Ovechkin was the Caps’ top scorer with three goals and three assists, that just wasn’t good enough.

Then there’s poor Henrik Lundqvist. Hung out to dry by his defense in Game 4 and Game 5, holding strong through the first three games of the series and just unable to completely shut things down. Believe it or not, the injury to Martin Biron may have been a killer as Lundqvist had to play every game down the stretch just to get the Rangers into the playoffs. Lundqvist’s job is play tons of games anyhow, but a breather or two down the stretch could’ve helped out a lot.

4. Not enough talent
It’s nice to be able to make this assessment and be able to cite the team’s head coach when doing so. After their Game 5 loss, John Tortorella had this to say about where the team is at.

“We’re still in a process so we’ll just keep on going to try to get better, there are areas with our team that need to get better,” Tortorella said before adding, “I don’t think our team is fully built yet. You’ve got to remember what this Washington team was for a number of years, look how their team was built with the draft picks. So we’re not there yet, to be honest with you, we’re not as far as talent. We have to play a certain way but, again, we’re in the process. We’ll continue to build to try to find our way.”

He’s right. Certainly in this series the Rangers couldn’t compete with the Capitals and while the Rangers do have a virtually maxed out payroll, they’re not there yet and it showed in how things went down in the playoffs.

Oilers go captain-less, name four alternates instead

Leave a comment

Edmonton’s made a fairly significant shift in its leadership group.

The big news is the Oilers won’t have a captain this season, as Andrew Ference will relinquish the “C” he’s worn for the last two years.

Ference will, however, remain part of the group and wear an “A” as part of a four-man alternate captain collective, one that also includes Jordan Eberle, Ryan Nugent-Hopkins and Taylor Hall.

The news of Ference being removed as captain doesn’t come as a huge surprise. The veteran d-man is a well-respected leader, but isn’t expected to be in the lineup every night this season.

The decision to go without a captain, though, is something of a surprise, especially given what new head coach Todd McLellan endured during his final season in San Jose.

The Sharks’ captaincy issue — stripping Joe Thornton, then going with four rotating alternates — was an ongoing problem, something that players, coaches and GM Doug Wilson had to repeatedly address until it blew up in spectacular fashion.

That said, the circumstances in Edmonton are quite different.

It’s believed the club’s intentionally keeping the captaincy vacant, on the assumption that Connor McDavid will evolve into a superstar and the club’s unquestioned leader.

Finally, McLellan noted that with Eberle currently sidelined, a fifth Oiler would be added to the leadership group — veteran forward Matt Hendricks, who will serve as a temporary alternate.

Brandon Sutter didn’t have the greatest preseason

1 Comment

When Brandon Sutter was acquired by the Vancouver Canucks, GM Jim Benning called the 26-year-old a “foundation piece for our group going forward.”

Sutter was quickly signed to a five-year extension worth almost $22 million, more evidence of how highly management thought of the player.

Fast forward to yesterday, when Benning was asked the following question:

“What does it say that you made the trade for Sutter, you called him a ‘foundation’ player, and it took him until the final night of the preseason to find a spot (with the Sedins) on the wing, which isn’t his natural position?”

Here was Benning’s response:

“Well, [head coach Willie Desjardins] wants to try that out, he thinks that’s going to be a good fit. At various times, the Sedins played with wingers with speed, with [Ryan Kesler], who could get in on the forecheck and had a good shot. Sutter brings some of those qualities, too.”

While all that may be true, Sutter was not signed to play the wing; he was brought in to play center, specifically on the second line. He finished the preseason with zero points in five games. And as mentioned, he’ll start the season on the wing, not his natural position.

Meanwhile, youngsters Bo Horvat, 20, and Jared McCann, 19, had outstanding camps and are expected to start the regular season (tonight in Calgary) centering the second and third lines, respectively.

Though Sutter did finish the preseason with 12 shots on goal, up there with the most on the Canucks, it’s fair to say he did not look like a “foundation” player.

“I haven’t seen him play his best,” Desjardins said last week. “I see a guy who’s big and a good skater and who understands the game real well, but just hasn’t got that involved.”

Now, we are only talking about the preseason here. New players often take time to get comfortable. Perhaps playing with the Sedins can provide Sutter with some confidence.

“I know he’ll be there and I totally believe that,” said Desjardins.

But it hasn’t been the best start, and if it wasn’t for the encouraging play of the youngsters, it would be a far bigger story in Vancouver.

Related: Canucks roll the dice on rookies, waive Vey and Corrado