Tim Brent, Darroll Powe

Welcome to salary cap hell, Philadelphia: Flyers take Leighton off LTIR, put Laperriere on LTIR

The Flyers made a couple of moves today that likely flew under the radar for fans as they activated goaltender Michael Leighton off of LTIR and put injured forward Ian Laperriere on it with post-concussion syndrome issues. In order to get Leighton on to the 23-man active roster, the Flyers also put defenseman Matt Walker on injured reserve. While this is just arranging things so Leighton can rejoin the Flyers this week and the team rolls with three goaltenders on their NHL roster, the other implication in this applies to their salary cap.

The Flyers couldn’t activate Leighton until they cleared the cap room for him, so Laperriere  was the obvious choice since he’s been out all season long and doesn’t appear likely to return this year thanks to post-concussion syndrome. The seemingly simple salary juggling here isn’t all that it appears to be as SBN Philly’s Geoffrey Detweiler discusses at length today. After crunching the numbers and sifting through the legalese of the NHL Collective Bargaining Agreement, Detweiler came up with this conclusion as to why the Flyers are pretty boned right now under the salary cap. Get your abacus out to deal with some money issues.

The Flyers have been spending $4,071 more than the cap every day this year, but were able to do so because they had an LTIR cushion of $8,333 per day, due to Michael Leighton being on LTIR. With Leighton returning and Laperriere going on LTIR, they can now go over the salary cap by $6,272 per day. With the $4,071 in overages continuing – because nobody’s contract has been removed – the Flyers now can only increase their daily spending by $2,201.

The NHL’s league minimum salary for 2010-11 is $500,000. That’s equal to a $2,688 daily cap hit, or $487 more than the Flyers can afford.

With this move, the Flyers have effectively prevented themselves from being able to afford anybody not already on the roster. Not a problem, right? With Jody Shelley suspended for two games, if any forward gets the flu and cannot play in those games, the Flyers will have to dress Oskars Bartulis as the 12th forward. They can’t afford to call anybody up without making another move.

This puts the Flyers in a similar position that the Devils found themselves in earlier this year when they could only suit up the bare minimum (or less than that) number of players for a few games so they couldn’t be caught circumventing the salary cap.  As we’ve seen this year, regardless of how many players the Devils have been able to ice this year it hasn’t helped them win games. The Flyers have been doing much better than that this year and are near the top of the Eastern Conference but not having the flexibility to make moves when you need to hurts.

As it is, the Flyers will wait things out to see if Leighton can come back and work well before deciding on who goes as the third goalie. There’s no real need to have a third goalie on the roster. The hang up there is that both Sergei Bobrovsky and Brian Boucher have played well this year. Go figure, tough decisions will be hard to make. Of course if someone gets injured in goal in the meantime, they’re all set. Anywhere else on the ice and things get dicey fast. Wonder if the Flyers would like an advance on that boosted salary cap that’s supposed to happen next year.

‘If he was in Toronto, there’d be no Carey Price, media-wise’ – Boudreau on Dubnyk

Leave a comment

The Minnesota Wild aren’t exactly dominating the NHL, so it might be easy to ignore just how outstanding Devan Dubnyk has been to start the 2016-17 season.

We’re talking “Carey Price and Tuukka Rask territory.”

While his 11-6-3 record won’t blow anyone’s mind, his 1.65 GAA and .946 save percentage are jaw-dropping. With Dubnyk doing special things, Bruce Boudreau felt the need to say weird things* after Dubnyk helped the Wild beat the Toronto Maple Leafs 3-2 on Wednesday.

“If he was in Toronto, there would be no Carey Price … I’m just saying media-wise,” Boudreau said after the game, as you can see in this video:

That’s some Haagen-Daz level praise from Boudreau.

Even if Dubnyk was in a bigger market, there’d probably be room in our hockey thoughts for Dubnyk and the consensus best goalie in the world, but Boudreau’s larger point is taken: Dubnyk has been right there with the best early on this season.

And, let’s be honest, we shouldn’t be too hard on Boudreau or he might stop saying … well, things like this:

Never change, Bruce.

* – Unlike his comments about “Die Hard,” which were amusingly on-point.

Trademark headaches for the Vegas Golden Knights?

LAS VEGAS, NV - NOVEMBER 22:  The team name and logo for the Vegas Golden Knights are displayed on T-Mobile Arena's video mesh wall after the Vegas Golden Knights was announced as the name for the Las Vegas NHL franchise at T-Mobile Arena on November 22, 2016 in Las Vegas, Nevada. The team will begin play in the 2017-18 season.  (Photo by Ethan Miller/Getty Images)
Getty
1 Comment

It’s difficult to tell just how big of a headache this might be, but SBNation‘s Mary Clarke uncovered quite the eyebrow-raiser on Wednesday: the Vegas Golden Knights’ trademark request was rejected by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

You can read the 164-page document here (if you’re weird), but the gist is that “registration of the applied-for mark is refused because of a likelihood of confusion with the mark” used by the College of Saint Rose Golden Knights.

Clarke summarized it simply enough:

Essentially, the logos and stylizations are too similar. It’s baffling the NHL and Vegas didn’t go through the trademark process before announcing the name and logo last month. Yet, all is not lost. Later down, the document states the Black Knight Sports and Entertainment group “may respond to the refusal by submitting evidence and arguments in support of registration.”

Sports Illustrated’s Alex Prewitt received this release from the Vegas Golden Knights, which indicated that they will respond to the refusal (and also noted how teams like the Boston Bruins and UCLA Bruins share names without issues).

There seem to be some mixed messages, at least if you note owner Bill Foley’s response to NBC Las Vegas’ Amber Dixon:

Hmm.

This could merely be a messy issue that really doesn’t cause anything to go off track, even if people are certainly having some fun at the league and team’s expense.

The logo and other marks seem to be the biggest sticking point, so compare the two for yourself:

Again, this could all be a mild disruption, but it’s an odd situation. And, to some, a great laugh.

Related: There also might be some issues involving the Army.

Capitals manage OT win after coughing up lead to Bruins

Leave a comment

It wasn’t pretty, and they might have lost key defenseman Matt Niskanen to injury, but at least the Washington Capitals managed a win against the Boston Bruins.

For a while, it was looking pretty ugly.

After going up 3-0, the Capitals went more than a period’s worth of time without even managing a shot on goal. Whether you lean more toward giving the Bruins credit for fighting back or beating up the Capitals for “sitting on a lead,” it’s staggering that such a dangerous offense could be held in check for so long.

Luckily for Washington, Nicklas Backstrom salvaged the night with an overtime goal to give the Capitals a 4-3 overtime win.

Both teams have had a knack for extending games beyond regulation lately, by the way:

Capitals over the last three games:
Shootout loss to the Lightning
Overtime win against the Sabres
Overtime win tonight against the Bruins

Bruins over the last five games:
Shootout loss against Flyers
Shootout win against Hurricanes
Regulation win against Sabres
Overtime win against Panthers
Overtime loss to the Capitals

Maybe that’s what gets it done in 2016-17: finding ways to carve out wins and shake out rough patches, like the Caps did tonight.

Matt Niskanen injured by Patrice Bergeron boarding hit

4 Comments

Patrice Bergeron doesn’t have a reputation for dirty hits, but he drew the Washington Capitals’ ire for a hit on Matt Niskanen.

The Capitals consider Niskanen “probable” to return to Wednesday’s game against the Boston Bruins with what they’re calling an upper-body injury. Bergeron received a two-minute boarding penalty for the infraction.

(Check out video of the hit above.)

The Capitals’ Twitter acknowledged the brewing bad feelings.

Does Bergeron deserve supplemental discipline for that boarding hit?

Update: The Capitals won the game 4-3 in overtime, but Niskanen did not return. Click here for more on the Caps’ victory.