I know you’re looking at the headline and checking your calendar to see if it’s April 1st. You’ll have to take our word for it that it’s not but yes, it’s true that there’s talk of the NHL’s salary cap going up once again. With so many teams having to do their best to duck and dodge the cap this year, this could be welcome news to them. For those sticking to budgets, this could be some really bad news. TSN has the chatter going on ahead of the Board of Governors meetings set to begin on Monday in Palm Beach, Florida.
One of the most important topics on the agenda will be next season’s salary cap number which is expected to rise.
Preliminary projections assume the Salary Cap will go up at least another $2 million in the 2011-12 season from the current level of $59.4 million. This of course is under the assumption that the NHL Players’ Association requests a five per cent inflator as is their right.
If you’re not familiar with how the cap works, the NHLs salary cap is tied to league revenue. With revenue continuing to increase, so does the cap since teams ideally have more money to spend and reinvest in their teams. Of course, there are a few teams that for one reason or another keep their spending as close to the salary floor as they can. The twist on the possibility of the cap going up again is that it’s in the hands of the NHL players as to whether or not they’ll accept the inflator. We can’t help but wonder what Dan Ellis’ thoughts on this matter could be.
Considering the salary cap maneuvering we’ve seen out of the New Jersey Devils, Philadelphia Flyers, Boston Bruins, and Vancouver Canucks this off-season and throughout the start of the year, you have to figure these teams are in favor of seeing things change for the better to help themselves out. The dividing line between the league’s haves and have-nots might grow a little bigger if this adjustment is made for next season. Think that’ll be a point of contention at the Collective Bargaining Agreement discussion table after next season? You better believe it.
Report: Islanders cut first-rounder Barzal from camp
It seems Mathew Barzal has played in his last game in a New York Islanders’ uniform for a little while.
Barzal took part in the Islanders’ preseason finale against the Washington Capitals on Sunday, but after that contest the Islanders decided to return him to WHL Seattle, per Newsday’s Arthur Staple.
He was taken with the 16th overall pick in 2015 NHL Entry Draft. That selection was well-traveled as it originally belonged to the Pittsburgh Penguins, but was involved in the David Perron trade and then moved to the Islanders as part of Edmonton’s deal to get Griffin Reinhart.
Barzal is noteworthy for his skill and speed, but he may have slipped in the draft due to a knee injury he sustained during the 2014-15 campaign.
The Islanders also reassigned Kirill Petrov, Kevin Czuczman, Scott Mayfield, and Adam Pelech to the AHL’s Bridgeport Sound Tigers.
Torres offered in-person hearing, potentially setting up long suspension
The 33-year-old forward that has become known primarily for his controversial hits has once again put himself in the sights of the NHL’s Department of Players Safety. They confirmed that he was offered an in-person hearing following his hit on Jakub Silfverberg Saturday night. He declined the opportunity to meet with them face-to-face, but the offer itself is an important detail because it gives the league the option to suspend him for more than five games.
It certainly seems like the stage is set for a lengthy suspension. While Torres is not considered a repeat offender as his last suspension came more than 18 months ago, the NHL still retains the right to consider his history when deciding on this matter.
Among other incidents, he was once was banned from 25 games for his hit on Marian Hossa in 2012, although it was later reduced to 21 contests after an appeal. The NHL found that Torres was guilty of breaking three rules for that hit; namely interference, charging, and illegally hitting the head. The NHL is reviewing Torres’ latest incident for the same three violations.