Devils' Rolston and Salvador uneasy about unknown future with the team

brianrolston3.jpgWe’ve certainly talked more than enough lately about the potential effects of Ilya Kovalchuk re-signing with the Devils. We know, you’re probably tired of hearing about the whole thing and we don’t blame you. There are still a few things left for the Devils to do before the season starts, mainly clearing salary space.

Two names keep getting brought up as candidates to help the Devils get under the salary cap in Bryce Salvador and Brian Rolston. One downside to the business is that even those guys aren’t sure if they’ll be sticking around New Jersey or not as Rich Chere found out.

“No one wants to be part of leaving here. This is a great team with great chemistry,” defenseman Bryce Salvador told me. “The situation is, it’s going to be more than one player going. That’s just part of the business. Everyone understands that.

“For the Devils’ organization, they got a great player (in Kovalchuk). And the machine always changes. But I haven’t been thinking about it so much. The fact that I’ve been traded before, it doesn’t weigh so much on me.”

I guess having gone through the rigors and cold reality of the NHL world can make you a bit numb to being moved for one reason or another. But what if you’re someone like Brian Rolston with a no-trade clause and coming off two bad seasons in New Jersey? Reality is harsh.

“You talk about a no-trade. Teams can still trade you. It’s not black and white. You can have all those thoughts, but you just have to prepare yourself for the season and that’s what I did. I don’t really choose to think about that stuff.”

Yikes. We’d be happy to guess that when Rolston signed his four-year contract with the Devils two seasons ago, he had no designs on being sent out of town nor would he want to leave. Why else would you get a no-trade clause in your contract after all.

Then again, after two seasons where Rolston put up numbers similar to those he’d normally put up in one season, it’s proof that situations can change at a moment’s notice. Clearly neither player is excited at the prospect of potentially being moved from what should be a successful team but this is just how things work in the NHL with a salary cap in place.

Scroll Down For:

    North Dakota loses another d-man as Kings sign LaDue

    BOSTON, MA - APRIL 09:  Paul LaDue #6 of North Dakota skates against the Boston University Terriers during the second period of the 2015 NCAA Division I Men's Hockey Championship semifinals at TD Garden on April 9, 2015 in Boston, Massachusetts.  (Photo by Maddie Meyer/Getty Images)
    Getty Images
    Leave a comment

    Keaton Thompson, Troy Stecher and now, Paul LaDue.

    On Friday, the Kings announced that LaDue — the junior d-man that helped North Dakota win the Frozen Four — agreed to a one-year, entry-level deal, forgoing his senior season in the process.

    LaDue, 23, was part of a talented UND blueline that also featured fellow juniors Troy Stecher — who since signed with Vancouver — and Thompson, who inked with the Ducks.

    So yeah, bit of an exodus.

    Thankfully for North Dakota, freshman scoring sensation Brock Boeser has already committed to returning for his sophomore campaign, while junior defenseman Gage Ausmus — a San Jose draftee — vowed to go back to school as well.

    As for Frozen Four MOP Drake Caggiula — a senior that was already leaving school — he’s already begun his tour of interested NHL suitors.

    Per TSN, Caggiula has shortlisted six clubs: Philadelphia, Edmonton, Ottawa, Vancouver, Chicago and Buffalo.

    Wilson fined for kneeing Sheary

    Wilson hit
    1 Comment

    No suspension for Capitals forward Tom Wilson. Only a fine.

    That’s what the NHL’s Department of Player Safety decided after Wilson kneed Pittsburgh’s Conor Sheary last night in Washington.

    The fine of $2,403.67 is the maximum allowable under the CBA, and, at the very least, it puts Wilson on official notice.

    Wilson was not penalized on the play, and Sheary was able to leave the ice under his own power and remain in the game.

    “We’re just going to play hockey, and the refs are going to call it the way they see it,” Penguins coach Mike Sullivan told reporters afterwards. “Our guys are going to play.”

    This morning, Capitals coach Barry Trotz reportedly said of the play, “It was OK, but it wasn’t I would say necessary.”

    Report: In expansion draft, teams must protect players with no-movement clauses

    Washington Capitals v Columbus Blue Jackets
    Getty
    4 Comments

    If a player has a no-movement clause, his club will be forced to protect him in next summer’s expected expansion draft.

    If, on the other hand, a player merely has a no-trade clause, his club will have no obligation to put him on its protected list.

    Those details were reported this morning by TSN’s Gary Lawless, shortly after he’d reported that the NHL and NHLPA had come together on a framework for a potential expansion draft.

    Per General Fanager, here’s the difference between the two clauses:

    A No-Movement Clause prohibits a team from moving a player by trade, loan or waivers, or assigning that player to the minors without the player’s consent. This keeps the player with the pro team unless permitted by the player to move the player by one of these means. A No-Movement Clause does not restrict a team from buying out or terminating a player’s contract.

    A No-Trade Clause is less restrictive, as it only places restrictions on movement by trade. A player with a No-Trade Clause cannot be traded by a team unless the player provides consent. A Partial or Modified No-Trade Clause is often less restrictive than a Full No-Trade Clause, and depends on the conditions outlined in the player’s contracts. Often these are No-Trade Clauses with conditions that give the player the right to provide a list of teams to which the team can or cannot trade the player.

    So, for example, in Pittsburgh, the Penguins would be obligated to put Sidney Crosby, Evgeni Malkin, Phil KesselMarc-Andre Fleury, and Kris Letang on their protected list. All five have NMCs, per General FanagerPatric Hornqvist, however, would not require protection, even though he has a modified no-trade clause.

    Now, granted, the Penguins weren’t going to risk leaving their superstars exposed anyway.

    Where this rule could have consequences is if a team is forced to protect a player with a no-move, at the expense of exposing a player it would prefer to keep. 

    In Columbus, for example, David Clarkson, Scott Hartnell and Fedor Tyutin have no-moves, as do Brandon Dubinsky and Nick Foligno. So, assuming General Fanager’s information is correct and there aren’t any complicating factors, that’s five players they’d be obligated to protect, whether they’d want to or not.

    We’ll let Jackets fans fret over what that may cost them. There will be plenty of fretting league-wide, no doubt. 

    But just remember, if the NHL only expands to Las Vegas — and that’s the most likely scenario at this point — each team can only lose one player in the expansion draft.

    Ducks fire Boudreau

    Anaheim Ducks head coach Bruce Boudreau, back, looks on against the Colorado Avalanche in the second period of an NHL hockey game Saturday, April 9, 2016, in Denver. (AP Photo/David Zalubowski)
    AP
    19 Comments

    In the end, it was one playoff failure too many.

    On Friday, the Ducks reacted to their upset loss to Nashville by doing the expected — relieving head coach Bruce Boudreau of his duties.

    “I would like to thank Bruce for his hard work and dedication to the franchise,” Ducks GM Bob Murray said in a statement, tweeted out by the club. “This was a very difficult decision to make.

    “Bruce is a good coach and character person, and we wish him the best of luck in the future.”

    Boudreau, 61, enjoyed tremendous regular-season success in Anaheim — 208-104-40 record over five years — but ultimately paid the price for the club’s playoff failures.

    Despite a wealth of talent and repeated home-ice advantage, the Ducks never qualified for a Stanley Cup final and were twice bounced in the opening round. Most damning was the club’s record in Game 7s — Wednesday’s loss to Nashville was the fourth straight Game 7 defeat Anaheim had suffered.

    What’s more, it was the fourth time they lost a series in which they led 3-2.

    What’s more, it was the fourth Game 7 they lost on home ice.

    For Boudreau, this firing will only add to the narrative that’s dogged him throughout his career, dating back to his time in Washington.

    Great regular-season coach, not so much in the playoffs.

    It’s ultimately unfair and probably too simplistic, but it’s hard to ignore the fact that a coach with an impressive win total — 409, putting him No. 32 all-time — has never competed for the Stanley Cup, and only qualified for one conference final.

    Looking ahead, it’ll be interesting to see if Boudreau can find work as quickly as the last time he was fired. After getting turfed in Washington, it took him all of two days to be hired by the Ducks, and it’s quite possible Ottawa could now be in the mix for his services.

    The Sens are looking for an experienced bench boss, per new GM Pierre Dorion, and have already interviewed ex-Wild head coach Mike Yeo.

    Related: Boudreau says this was the Ducks’ toughest loss yet