Hearing from different coaches and GMs who attended the NHL’s research and development camp in Toronto is proving to be fascinating. If it’s not hearing from many GMs who want to reduce the importance of the shootout, it’s getting the opinions of many of the NHLs smartest people about what tweaks they’d like to see the league adopt in the name of improving the sport. For Detroit Red Wings assistant general manager Jim Nill, he too is excited by some of the possibilities as George Sipple of the Detroit Free Press found out.
Nill said shallower nets would give skaters more room behind the net.
“You can get around the net quicker,” he said. “You have a quicker wraparound. It’s going to create scoring chances.”
As far as the different overtime possibilities they tested out (4-on-4 with a long change, 3-on-3, and 2-on-2 overtime), there’s one part that Nill did not find favor with whatsoever and you can’t really blame him.
The NHL also tested having overtime reduced from 4-on-4 play to 3-on-3 and then down to 2-on-2.
“I thought it was great going to 3-on-3, but 2-on-2 was a disaster,” Nill said. “It was too much open ice, too gimmicky.”
Nill said he would prefer having a game decided with 3-on-3 play in overtime, rather than in a shoot-out.
“I’d rather it be decided with game skills, rather than a game decided on 1-on-1 skill,” he said. “The action in 3-on-3 is unbelievable, and people want to see action.”
We’ve hit on a lot of these things that have been discussed at the R&D camp and, overall, it’s great to see the league try these things out in a careful setting but the biggest boon from all this is how much the dislike of the shootout seems to be gaining momentum. Whether you like it or not is up to your personal tastes and I’m not going to wag my finger at anyone who enjoys the insta-drama offered by the shootout.
Now that the NHL is reducing the importance of shootouts so that they won’t help factor into playoff tie-breakers, it feels as if the clock is ticking on what happens next with the shootout. The league obviously loves the entertainment aspect of it, but it’s clear they hate that it has such a huge effect on games and that teams are becoming more and more willing to go to a shootout to win a game. While I doubt that it will go away entirely, fixing up the points system in the NHL could be the next move the league looks for to straighten things up. After all, having games that reach overtime be worth more points than games decided in regulation has all sorts of flaws attached to it.
You’d think the reaction to taking a skate to the face would be something like “Not coming back to that game, getting some ice and maybe do some soul-searching.”
Nope, not in the NHL, at least.
In this league, the real reaction is almost always to come back to the same game … and barely miss a beat.
Ottawa Senators Mark Stone provides the latest example of hockey toughness, as he bounced back almost immediately from this.
What did he do? He scored a nice goal in the Senators’ 6-1 blowout of the Toronto Maple Leafs.
It’s said that variety is the spice of life, yet it seems to be the spite of the Minnesota Wild.
As head coach Mike Yeo said, this struggling team appears to find a new way to lose virtually every night. That couldn’t have happened once again on Saturday, when they fell 4-1 to the St. Louis Blues, could it?
If you ask Jarret Stoll, the latest problem was the penalty kill.
Honestly, Stoll may have been too specific, likely trying to throw his own unit under the bus. Instead, it might be more accurate to say that Minnesota’s special teams let them down.
Indeed, the Wild struggled to limit the Blues’ power play, which went an unsettling 3-for-6. That said, Minnesota had a chance to trade blows with St. Louis. Instead, the Wild managed one power-play goal on seven opportunities.
The silver lining is that the Wild believe that they showed more fight than this fragile bunch had been generating before.
On the other hand, with Jonas Brodin on IR and Jared Spurgeon apparently hurt, that silver lining may not be so easy to see.
Worry (if you’re pulling for the Stars) or gloat (if you’re a Blackhawks fan) all you want, but the bottom line is that the Central Division’s No.1 spot is clearly in Chicago’s control after Saturday night.
The Blackhawks earned a decisive 5-1 win against the Dallas Stars, giving them a five-point standings lead over Dallas for the Central Division lead.
You may feel like that’s more of the same, but consider this: things would look a lot closer if Dallas won or gained points, as they hold three games in hand on the ‘Hawks.
At least one Blackhawks player admits this game means a little more than your average W.
Indeed, while Antti Niemi was pulled from the game and Kari Lehtonen faced his own struggles in Dallas’ net, Corey Crawford ranked as one of the big reasons why the score was so lopsided.
(Artem Anisimov had a big say in that, too.)
As a wise coach with 1,000+ games of experience would do, Joel Quenneville didn’t go overboard in assessing the victory.
Was this a statement game? Who knows, but a certain statement is that the Blackhawks now have a five-point standings lead.
Looking at the standings, beating the Buffalo Sabres was pretty important for the Boston Bruins. The Atlantic Division’s run for spots appears particularly congested out East.
Of all the Bruins to get a chance to win it all, the team might have wanted Brad Marchand to have that opportunity. He’s on pace to destroy his previous career-highs for scoring, and Marchand’s been particularly hot lately.
Either way, Marchand came up big indeed, scoring the rare overtime game-winner on a penalty shot. Check out the drama below:
That can be a big extra point and ROW (regulation/overtime win) when the regular season is finished.
Note: Many believe that Marchand should not have received a penalty shot on the play.