What should (or could?) be done about messy no-trade clauses?

1 Comment

Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for oopsburke.jpgWhen someone is about to sign a contract, there’s often that thought: you better check the fine print.

Sure, it’s easy to follow dollars and cents, whether it’s a players salary vs. their cap hit. But what about some of the more nuanced elements of a contract? A lot of times deals get complicated when you start throwing in player/team options, incentive-laden bonuses and one particular thing that sprouted up this weekend: a no-trade clause.

It’s a prickly issue, especially in the salary cap era, as a player who seems essential one season can turn expendable a couple years later. Greg Wyshynski of Puck Daddy discussed Brian Burke’s emphatic stance not to trade a player (such at Tomas Kaberle) who has a no trade clause today.

The way I see it: There’s no harm in asking. Fans have every right to be upset when a player doesn’t waive one for the “betterment of the team” or his own career — hello, Mats Sundin(notes) — but at the end of the day, the team agreed to the no-trade provision, usually because the player made a concession on money or years. So you can’t kill a guy for playing one of the few cards the players still hold with regard to their career paths.

Jeff Marek of CBC Sports sided with Burke’s philosophy because (a) no-trade clauses are usually negotiated as part of a player contract in lieu of additional money and (b) you can’t compensate a player for waiving that no-trade clause.

But in thinking about Burke’s philosophy, what about this proposal: Should the next CBA allow players and their teams to negotiate a no-trade clause buyout, in which a team can remove the NTC for given amount at any point in the contract?

It would be an option, not mandatory, for players seeking no-trade clauses. Maybe there’s even a way to open that provision up for in-season negotiation, rather than a “trigger” price; although whether it’s a pre-determined amount or a negotiated sum, one imagines there’d have to be some kind of salary cap implication for the NTC buyout.

Thumbnail image for kaberleshovesthrasher.jpgTeams have all sorts of “rights” when it comes to moving players around. They can send a reasonably decent player to the minors simply for salary reasons – just look at Michael Nylander’s situation in Washington. He wasn’t necessarily the best fit for coach Bruce Boudreau’s attacking style, but at a more reasonable price, he’d be a no-brainer for another NHL team. Yet he’s stuck in foreign league/AHL limbo because of his costly contract.

The next Collective Bargaining Agreement negotiations could be looked at in two distinctly different ways. You could either see it as a harbinger of doom if you subscribe to the (frightfully reasonable) notion that the league is heading for another crippling lockout. On the other hand, you may look at it as an opportunity for the NHL to clean up the messy loopholes and blunders of their first post-lockout labor agreement.

I cannot say for sure what the best way to handle NTC’s would be … except for the numbly obvious suggestion that teams avoid them altogether. What do you think, PHT readers?

Leafs avoid arbitration with Peter Holland

TORONTO, ON - APRIL 11: Peter Holland #24 of the Toronto Maple Leafs skates up the ice during NHL action against the Montreal Canadiens at the Air Canada Centre April 11, 2015 in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.  (Photo by Abelimages/Getty Images)
Getty
1 Comment

The Toronto Maple Leafs won’t require arbitration with forward Peter Holland. They’ve signed the 25-year-old to a one-year deal worth a reported $1.3 million.

Holland had a hearing scheduled for today. Last week, the Leafs sent a message by putting him on waivers, which he cleared.

Holland had nine goals and 18 assists in 65 games last season. With him signed, the Leafs have only defensemen Frank Corrado and Martin Marincin as restricted free agents. Corrado has an arbitration hearing scheduled for tomorrow; Marincin’s is next Tuesday.

Related: Corrado and Leafs aren’t that far apart

Arbitration looming this week for Mrazek and DeKeyser

TAMPA, FL - APRIL 16: Nikita Kucherov #86 of the Tampa Bay Lightning is checked by Danny DeKeyser #65 of the Detroit Red Wings in front of Petr Mrazek #34 in Game One of the Eastern Conference Quarterfinals during the 2015 NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs at Amalie Arena on April 16, 2015 in Tampa, Florida. (Photo by Mike Carlson/Getty Images)
Getty
1 Comment

This is an important week in the Detroit Red Wings’ offseason, with Petr Mrazek‘s arbitration hearing scheduled for Wednesday and Danny DeKeyser‘s for Thursday.

GM Ken Holland would prefer to avoid the hearings, which can sometimes result in hurt feelings.

“I think a negotiated settlement is always better than having an arbitrated settlement,” Holland told MLive.com. “Obviously, both sides run (the risk) of somebody’s not going to be happy.”

That being said, in Mrazek’s case, the two sides still have a ways to go. Remember that the 24-year-old netminder was excellent for most of 2015-16, but in Holland’s words, “the wheels came off a little bit in the middle of February.”

Hence, the divide:

DeKeyser, meanwhile, is more of a proven NHL commodity. He’s had three full seasons in the league. In the 26-year-old defenseman, the Red Wings pretty much know what they’ve got.

“There’s way more comparables, I think, in Dan DeKeyser‘s case so it was easier to figure out what was the market place,” said Holland. “That’s certainly not the case of Petr Mrazek’s situation.”

Holland’s work will not be finished once Mrazek and DeKeyser are signed. He still wants to add another defenseman, and he’s got a surplus of forwards to work with.

Related: Holland makes argument to keep Jimmy Howard

Flyers sign Brayden Schenn to four-year deal

Philadelphia Flyers' Brayden Schenn reacts after scoring during the second period of an NHL hockey game against the Calgary Flames on Monday, Feb. 29, 2016 in Philadelphia. (AP Photo/Tom Mihalek)
AP
7 Comments

The Flyers won’t require today’s scheduled arbitration hearing with Brayden Schenn. They’ve agreed to terms with the 24-year-old forward on a four-year contract with a reported cap hit of $5.125 million.

Schenn had a career-high 26 goals and 33 assists in 2015-16. His 59 points were the third most on the Flyers, behind only Claude Giroux‘s 67 and Wayne Simmonds‘ 60.

The Schenn signing leaves the Flyers with just over $1 million in cap space for 2016-17, but no major free agents remaining. RFA defenseman Brandon Manning still needs a contract, but that’s it, per General Fanager. Manning has an arbitration hearing scheduled for Aug. 2.

Related: Coyotes sign Luke Schenn

Scrivens signs in KHL with Dinamo Minsk

Montreal Canadiens' Devante Smith-Pelly , center,and Brendan Gallagher, left, celebrate their victory over the Carolina Hurricanes with goalie Ben Scrivens at an NHL hockey game Sunday, Feb. 7, 2016, in Montreal. (Paul Chiasson/The Canadian Press via AP) MANDATORY CREDIT
AP
Leave a comment

Ben Scrivens is off to Belarus. The 29-year-old goalie has reportedly signed with Dinamo Minsk of the KHL.

Scrivens made 14 starts for the Montreal Canadiens in 2015-16, failing to really take advantage of his opportunity with the Habs and finishing 5-8-0 with a .906 save percentage.

In total, Scrivens made 144 appearances (130 starts) in NHL games, his best season coming in 2013-14, which he split between Los Angeles and Edmonton. The Oilers gave up a third-round draft pick to get him. They eventually acquired Zack Kassian when they dealt him away.

Related: Maple Leafs reportedly close to signing Jhonas Enroth