I highly doubt the Nashville Predators trading away Jason Arnott was a
big surprise to some, although him being dealt back to New Jersey
certainly caught most of us off guard.
Lost in all of the furor
over the trade yesterday was the fact that Arnott did have a no-trade
clause in his contract and needed to agree to be traded before Nashville
could deal him. It turns out it wasn’t that tough of a decision, as
Arnott says that he and the team came to a mutual decision that the
Predators needed to get younger and he wasn’t a part of those future
“They kind of
explained what the situation was and it just didn’t seem
like I was in their (plans) for long term,” Arnott said. “So I decided
I’d rather move my family now and we both kind of came to the agreement
that it was time for the young guys to step in and do their thing, and
for me to move on. So it was kind of a mutual thing.”
David Poile says that while this was certainly a bold move it wasn’t
necessarily a temporary step back as the team looks to “rebuild”. The
team also has not had discussions about which player will replace Arnott
as team captain, although many expect for Shea Weber to have the “C” on
his chest next season.
For Arnott, hopefully this is a chance for
him to enjoy one last good season as he returns to New Jersey. His
leadership was constantly called into question over the past year in
Nashville, as it seemed that he wore the “C” for no other reason than he
was basically the only option, aside from perhaps Dan Hamhuis. With
Barry Trotz calling out Arnott at times at the end of the season, it
certainly seemed his time on the team was limited.
This is a great
move all around for both Arnott and the Predators, as the team looks to
move in a new direction this summer. With the trades sending Hamhuis
and Arnott to other teams, the Predators are in position to make major
changes this offseason.
Then again, in this interview, Poile says he doesn’t anticipate many more changes for the Predators. So perhaps this is just the Predators making moves to alter the direction of the team by moving on without Arnott and Hamhuis.
Datsyuk ‘wants to make sure the Wings have options,’ says his agent
“He would like to leave, but at the same time, he wants to make sure the Wings have options,” Milstein said. “He wants to help the team any way he can with the salary cap issue.”
Wings general manager Ken Holland has said there are no loopholes. Because Datsyuk signed his last contract after he turned 35, his $7.5 million salary cap hit remains in tact even if Datsyuk departs. The Wings’ only option is to trade his contract to a team such as Arizona or Carolina that could use the hefty cap hit in order to be above the salary cap minimum.
At the age of 37, his career in the league started in 2001-02, and has spanned 953 regular season games in which he’s accrued 918 points.
He’s had a highly decorated career, with two Stanley Cup championships with the Red Wings, three Selke and four Lady Byng trophies.
Allen or Elliott? Another goalie decision looms for Hitchcock
The St. Louis Blues need to win Game 6 on Wednesday, or their season is over. Who they decide to turn to in net is likely to be a talking point — heated debate, maybe? — leading up to that contest.
Do they go back to Jake Allen for a third consecutive start, despite the fact he allowed four goals on 25 shots in Monday’s Game 5 loss to the San Jose Sharks? Or, will head coach Ken Hitchcock turn once again to Brian Elliott, who started every single game from the series opener of the first round versus Chicago to Game 3 of the Western Conference Final.
“I thought he was fine. I don’t know, those are decisions we make in a day or so. But I thought he was fine today. He stopped some point-blank shots, especially early, three times early,” Hitchcock told reporters.
“I don’t know. That’s stuff we’ll talk about tomorrow.”
Feeding frenzy: Sharks send Blues to the brink of elimination in Western Conference Final