Laviolette not revealing plans for goaltenders in Game 2

Earlier today I gave my guess as to what Peter Laviolette would do
with his goaltender situation heading into Game 2. Turns out, we’re
going to have to wait a day to find out ourselves.

After the
Flyers’ practice today, Laviolette was not giving any hints as to what
direction he might be going.

“We will keep everything internally
with regards to lineups, lineup
changes, lines, goaltenders, anything that’s internal we’ll probably
keep it internal,” Laviolette said.

I can respect Laviolette not
revealing any of his plans for tomorrow night; after all, this is the
Stanley Cup finals. Coaches don’t reveal anything at all when it comes
to their lineups or their players.

What is interesting is that it
appears he hasn’t let Leighton or Boucher know either. At least, they
didn’t know when they talked to the media after practice.

“It’s
kind of up in the air, I haven’t talked to the coach yet,” said
Leighton. “But if I am, I’ll just approach it like I did last
game, just keep doing what I’ve been doing and try not to think about
what happened last night.”

Obviously, Leighton says that he’ll be disappointed if he’s not starting in Game 2. Still, he’s not willing to start any sort of controversy and is just wanting to do whatever it takes for his team to win.

“Obviously, I would be disappointed,” Leighton said. “We’re in the Stanley Cup Final.
That’s not the time to be mad at someone if I’m not starting. If
Boucher goes in, he did a great job going in the other night. If he gets
the start, then I have to support him. I’m not going to sit there and
pout on the bench, because we’re in the Stanley Cup Final.”

Neither player was told before or during
practice, but it appears the coaches will let them know before they go
back to the hotel from practice. Both goaltenders said that they were
worked the same during practice, trying to keep both goalies fresh,
although Leighton did receive extra attention from the goaltenders
coach.

With Laviolette not coming out and steadfastly sticking
with Boucher after pulling Leighton last night, it feels as if the
Flyers will have Leighton in net tomorrow night.

Scroll Down For:

    Columnist warns Blackhawks fans: DeBrincat may not make the jump

    Getty
    2 Comments

    It’s easy to see why Chicago Blackhawks fans are excited about Alex DeBrincat.

    The undersized forward already seemed like a potential steal when the Blackhawks drafted him in the second round (39th overall) back in 2016, as he was coming off consecutive 100-point seasons in the OHL. DeBrincat topped that in 2016-17, scoring more than a goal per game (65 in 63) and finishing with a ridiculous 127 points.

    Honestly, that last paragraph might leave some Blackhawks fans twitching with excitement.

    MORE: DeBrincat was the one to watch at prospects camp

    CSN Chicago’s Tracey Myers relays an important message on Thursday, though: tap the brakes.

    Beyond the questions of the 19-year-old being ready for the NHL, Myers reasonably wonders if Chicago can fit him into its salary structure.

    Looking at the Blackhawks’ listing at Cap Friendly, it’s clear that Myers has a point. There are 14 forwards under contract, and as Myers notes, only Nick Schmaltz can be sent to the AHL without needing to clear waivers.

    The Athletic’s Scott Powers notes that few 19-year-olds have made much of a dent on recent Blackhawks rosters beyond Patrick Kane, Jonathan Toews, and Nick Leddy. As great as Joel Quenneville can be at integrating younger players into Chicago’s mix, history states that DeBrincat indeed faces an uphill climb.

    Then again, for a smaller forward whose numbers sometimes get disregarded or downplayed because of his stature, DeBrincat’s probably used to overcoming odds. If nothing else, the Blackhawks seem willing to go the extra mile if it gives them a better chance to compete.

    Even so, Blackhawks fans would probably be wise not to pencil him into the 2017-18 lineup just yet.

    Katie Bieksa enlists husband Kevin, other Ducks to promote book (shirtless)

    via Kevin Bieksa's Twitter feed
    Leave a comment

    Katie Bieksa, wife of Anaheim Ducks defenseman Kevin Bieksa, found herself in a bind after he was traded from the Vancouver Canucks. With extenuating circumstances keeping her from working normally, she wrote a novel … and decided to promote it in a brilliant way.

    AJ Manderichio of the Ducks website provided an in-depth look at Katie Bieksa’s experience writing “Newport Jane,” which Bieksa compares – in some ways – to “Desperate Housewives.”

    Which seems like a convenient segue to mention one way of hyping up the noveal: “Hot Guys Reading My Book” on Instagram.

    It started with Kevin, although Katie told Manderichio that it required some negotiating.

    “These guys are looking for opportunities to show off their summer bodies. They were volunteering, and that’s where the idea came from,” Katie says. “There was someone – it may have been Kevin – who said ‘I am NOT going to take a picture with your book,’ and I said ‘Oh yes you are.’

    “When he said he would do it, the rest of the guys did. They’ve all been so supportive, and that’s such a nice feeling. It is a community, and you do depend on each other. It’s so nice to have that support, bear down and take the picture.”

    Good stuff.

    Kevin’s caption really sold it “Yes this is how I usually read.”

    As you can see on the Instagram feed, noted pest Ryan Kesler also “contributed,” but Andrew Cogliano‘s missing teeth stole the show.

    Here is part of the “Newport Jane” summary on Amazon, which in a just world would inspire people to call Kevin Bieksa “the cardiac surgeon.”

    From the outside, Ellen has it all: a glamorous new life in a sun-soaked city more like a movie set than the small Northern town where she grew up, and her very own McDreamy. But being married to a gorgeous, brilliant cardiac surgeon also means standing in his shadow, putting aside her dreams to follow his—and having way too much time home alone to think about how much she’s given up to follow him to California.

    Don’t worry, there probably won’t be a spin-off involving shirtless blogging.

    Flames hand Hathaway a two-way deal

    Getty
    1 Comment

    The Calgary Flames signed forward Garnet Hathaway to a one-year, two-way contract on Thursday.

    Hathaway, 25, earned some reps on the team despite being undrafted.

    Here’s how his NHL work looks so far:

    2015-16: three assists, 31 PIM in 14 games played.
    2016-17: one goal, four assists, 44 PIM in 26 GP.

    If the penalty minutes didn’t make it obvious, Hathaway is the “rugged” type. He’s already provided some snarly action shots against the Flames’ rivals, as you can see below and in this post’s main image.

    via Getty

    He clearly makes friends quickly.

    The Flames celebrated his first – and so far only – NHL goal after the signing.

    Penguins are ‘prepared to go to arbitration’ with Sheary, Dumoulin

    Getty
    Leave a comment

    Earlier today, PHT discussed how the Pittsburgh Penguins might take advantage of robust cap space to replace Nick Bonino. Of course, that cap space could really start to dry up depending upon how things go with RFAs Brian Dumoulin and Conor Sheary.

    At the moment, both are heading toward salary arbitration hearings, with Dumoulin’s scheduled for July 24 while Sheary is slated for Aug. 4.

    Both situations are pretty tricky, so it’s not too surprising that GM Jim Rutherford admitted to the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette’s Jason Mackey that the hearings will “probably” happen.

    “We’re prepared to go to arbitration,” Rutherford said.

    There’s still time – especially for Sheary – yet both hearings could be especially interesting considering the variety of different ways you can break down their value.

    Dumoulin: strong defense, weak offense (so far)

    Hockey Buzz’s Ryan Wilson and FanRag’s Dave Holcomb both went pretty deep on what Dumoulin might be worth, as did Matt Cane. The disparity is pretty interesting; Cane puts Dumoulin at about a $2.5 million value, Wilson proposes a five-year, $15M deal, and Holcomb wonders if Dumoulin could be worth as much as $5 million per season.

    Dumoulin’s reps might point to Olli Maatta as a handy comparable, although that comparison falls flat from simpler (i.e. Dumoulin not producing as much offense) and fancier perspectives. Sometimes it’s pretty plain to see HERO charts smiling upon one player more than the other.

    Still, both Dumoulin’s prominent use and his strong at-home work indicate that he’s worth a pretty penny, however many he’d receive.

    While he generated 16 and 15 points during the past two regular season runs, Dumoulin saw solid ice time in both 2015-16 and 2016-17. That was especially true during the playoffs, as he averaged 21:31 per night in the 2016 run and 21:59 TOI during this last postseason.

    Considering the waves of injuries the Penguins endured during the 2017 Stanley Cup Playoffs in particular, Dumoulin really showed his importance to the team.

    Now, will those details matter as much as weaker counting stats? We’d find out if Dumoulin’s hearing actually took place.

    Sheary’s sheer luck

    Somewhat amusingly, Conor Sheary is almost in the opposite situation.

    If you look at his simple stats, Sheary could argue for a pretty nice little raise.

    While his 2015-16 numbers are modest, he really took advantage of his time alongside Sidney Crosby this past season, scoring a remarkable 23 goals and 53 points … in just 61 regular-season games. That would be about 71 points over an 82-game span.

    His postseason numbers weren’t as great (seven points in 22 contests after 10 in the previous run), but one could imagine a solid argument made on the 25-year-old’s behalf considering that 23-goal output.

    Of course, the Crosby effect was significant. Sheary spent 697 of his 836 even-strength minutes with Crosby, while only spending 139 minutes without him last season. To his credit, Hockey Analysis’s numbers reveal that Sheary at least maintained decent possession numbers in those rare moments without number 87, but the sample size is too small to refute claims that Sheary was Jonathan Cheechoo to Crosby’s Joe Thornton.

    ***

    Ultimately, it’s tough to tell how much each player is worth, which might explain why arbitration hearings may just need to happen. Such hearings would be fascinating, though both the players and the Penguins would likely experience some serious nerves.