San Jose Sharks 2010-11 salary cap outlook

3 Comments

Thumbnail image for nabbyandmarleau.jpgMore detail about the Sharks’ unrestricted free agents



After being swept by the Chicago Blackhawks, I couldn’t help but wonder: did it mark the “end of an era” for the San Jose Sharks? To say that they have a confusing salary cap situation is putting it lightly. Two of the longest-standing faces of the franchise (Patrick Marleau and Evgeni Nabokov) are unrestricted free agents this season. Let’s not forget captain Rob Blake (UFA), playoff hero Joe Pavelski and productive sniper Devin Setoguchi (both restricted free agents).

I’m going to go more in-depth with each of those free agents in separate posts (one for restricted, one for unrestricted) later today, but for now I thought I’d cover their “big picture” salary cap situation. Here’s their 2010-11 Salary Cap Commitments as of this moment, according to numbers from CapGeek.com.

2010-11 San Jose Sharks Salary Cap Commitments (some figures rounded up)

Forwards (6 out of 12): Heatley ($7.5 million), Thornton (7.2), Clowe (3.63), Mitchell (1.37), Couture (1.24), McGinn (997k)

Defense (5 out of 6): Boyle (6.67), Vlasic (3.1), Murray (2.5), Huskins (1.7), Demers (543k)

Goalies (1 out of 2): Greiss (550k)

2010-11 Salary Cap Commitments: $36.99 million

If Cap remains the same, Cap Space: $20.525 million

Big free agents: Marleau, Nabokov, Blake, Pavelski, Setoguchi

Twenty-and-half million sounds like a big chunk of cap space, but the Sharks are without their defensive captain, three top-six forwards and their franchise goalie. Nabokov and Marleau alone cost the team almost $11.5 million cap hit-wise in the 2009-10 season. Again, we’ll get into those free agents in later posts.

Let’s look at players under the cap at this moment in time after the jump.


sharkscore.jpgSan Jose’s big contracts

It’s funny that Joe Thornton received so much heat for his playoff performance while Dany Heatley was nearly invisible. Whatever way you slice it, Heatley and Thornton combine for about $14.6 million in cap space. That’s a big chunk of change for players who did indeed struggle when it mattered the most.

Despite that ugly own-goal against the Avalanche, Dan Boyle was excellent in the playoffs. Still, Boyle is no spring chicken so you have to wonder if his satanic (6.66 and so on) cap hit will bedevil the Sharks in the future. Even Ryane Clowe’s deal is a little steep, although he brings a nice mixture of grit and skills to the table.

The rest

The team’s best contract is Marc-Edouard Vlasic’s $3.1 million cap hit. Vlasic plays big minutes and is a steady – if not spectacular – presence on their blueline.

Overall, the team is straddled with a few big deals and not many lasting bargains. It’s doubtful that they can bring back all of their high-end free agents and it’s plausible that one of their existing big guns may be traded. Regardless of the $20.5 million of space, the Sharks won’t be the same next year. What would you do if you were GM Doug Wilson … or whoever has the job once the organization sorts through the debris?

These 2017 NHL Draft picks lacked hype … but not swagger

Getty
Leave a comment

The interview process for draft prospects must be a real beating. Then again, it’s also an opportunity for hopefuls to push back.

In the case of two smaller prospects, it meant providing some swagger in their answers, possibly impressing their new teams. If nothing else, Kailer Yamamoto and Michael DiPietro generated some refreshingly confident quotes.

One would assume that the Edmonton Oilers picked Yamamoto with the 22nd choice for more than just a great answer alone … but still.

Nice, right?

Sportsnet’s Jeff Marek related a similar story about DiPietro, who the Vancouver Canucks nabbed with the 64th pick.

Funny story: When one team at the NHL told him “We don’t think you can play in the NHL with our team, you’re too small” at the combine, he fired back with “well, I guess you have a problem with winning, then.” How do you not like that?

If nothing else, those two aren’t shy.

As a bonus story, check out the bumpy path Will Reilly – aka the “Mr. Irrelevant” of the 2017 NHL Draft – took to being chosen last overall by the Pittsburgh Penguins, via Puck Daddy’s Sean Leahy. From the sound of things, there are worse feelings than going 217th.

The 2017 NHL Draft may have been “pumped down” from a hype perspective, yet it sounds like many of these prospects at least bring some moxie to the table.

Kings, Golden Knights labeled 2017 NHL Draft winners; Bruins, not so much

Getty
6 Comments

It’s nearly certain that we won’t be able to determine the “winners and losers” of the 2017 NHL Draft until, say, 2022. If not later.

Still, what fun is that?

Quite a few outlets pegged some winners and losers, though sometimes the choices were more about themes like nations or player types than specific teams.

For example: Puck Daddy gives a thumbs down to the “green room” experiment.

Let’s take a look at some of the consensus picks.

Winners

Vegas Golden Knights

GM George McPhee was dealt a bad hand when it comes to the lottery draft, so he instead made his own luck. And then he selected three players who could improve this team going forward.

Sportsnet’s Jeff Marek especially liked the last two of their three first-rounders (Nick Suzuki and Erik Brannstrom), viewing Cody Glass as more of a no-brainer. Plenty of others were on board.

Los Angeles Kings

Gabe Vilardi fell to Los Angeles, whether it was because of shaky skating or some other reason. That potential steal (and some other shrewd moves) impressed the Hockey News’ Ryan Kennedy, who assembled draft profiles for PHT.

Again, Vilardi’s loss was considered the Kings’ gain, as slower skaters were considered losers by the likes of Post Media’s Michael Traikos.

Philadelphia Flyers

Boy, Ron Hextall is good at this thing, isn’t he? Philly drew high marks even beyond the layup of landing Nolan Patrick. The main area of disagreement revolved around the Brayden Schenn trade, though plenty came out on Hextall’s side there, too.

Arizona Coyotes

Boy, that negative press didn’t last long, did it? Between landing Niklas Hjalmarsson, Derek Stepan, and Antti Raanta in trades and savvy picks, they were a popular choice.

Themes

Smaller players, Sweden, and Finland drew semi-serious mentions as “winners.”

Losers

Boston Bruins

The perception is that they played it too safe.

Colorado Avalanche, for now?

OK, this was more about draft weekend than picks, but people are criticizing Joe Sakic for standing pat. That could change, but the negative sentiment is there.

Detroit Red Wings

Another common choice. Some believe that their draft was the worst of them all, which isn’t great considering the declining opinion of GM Ken Holland overall.

New York Rangers

Lias Andersson was viewed as a reach by plenty, and his connection to the trade to Arizona might intensify the scrutiny.

Themes

Not a great draft for Russian-born players and/or guys who don’t skate quite swiftly.

***

So, those are some of the near-consensus choices for winners and losers, via the brave souls who made rapid reactions to the 2017 NHL Draft.

Ducks ink D Holzer to two-year deal reportedly worth $1.8M

Getty
2 Comments

As the dust settled on the expansion draft, the Anaheim Ducks’ defense is coming into focus.

Sunday continued that pattern; the Ducks signed Korbinian Holzer to a two-year contract worth $1.8 million, according to TVA’s Renaud Lavoie.

You can break down the Ducks defense as more expensive players (Hampus Lindholm, Sami Vatanen, Cam Fowler, and Kevin Bieksa) and cheaper ones (Holzer, Brandon Montour, and Josh Manson).

Only Vatanen, Lindholm and Holzer see contracts that go beyond 2017-18 – at least without an extension yet for the likes of Fowler and Manson – so Holzer provides a little bit of certainty.

Is the $900K a minor overpay, though? Holzer played in 32 games for the Ducks this season after appearing in 29 in 2015-16. His impact has been pretty minimal, generating seven points while averaging 13:31 in ice time per contest (down from 14:45 the previous season).

Granted he may get more opportunities to show what he’s capable of if the Ducks lose another piece. Then again, at 29, the Ducks likely know what they have.

2017 Hockey Hall of Fame class to be named Monday; Selanne + who?

Getty
7 Comments

The 2017 Hockey Hall of Fame class is expected to be announced on Monday, and every indication is that Teemu Selanne will be on the list. Beyond that, well, there are a lot of question marks.

NHL.com notes that there’s at least a possibility that Selanne will be the only NHL name to be part of this class, which would mark a first since 2010 (when Dino Ciccarelli was the lone addition).

It’s a nice way to continue what’s been a buffet for hockey fans: the 2017 Stanley Cup Final’s conclusion, the expansion draft and then the 2017 NHL Draft. The HHOF announcements are a nice appetizer before free agency gets, well, frenzied?

“The Finnish Flash” was also an obvious top choice in last year’s poll to see who should be in the class.

Now, that doesn’t mean he is the only interesting name.

For one thing, Daniel Alfredsson will be eligible for the first time, much like Selanne. “Alf” falls in the “Maybe” category with some interesting, debatable other options: Mark Recchi, Dave Andreychuk, Alex Mogilny, Jeremy Roenick, Paul Kariya, Chris Osgood, and more.

The 2016 Hockey Hall of Fame class included Eric Lindros, Rogie Vachon, Sergei Makarov, and Pat Quinn.