Explaining the "too many men" penalty

2 Comments

Bruins4.jpgAfter all of the “too many men” penalties we’ve seen in the playoffs,
it was inevitable that one would occur in historic fashion. The Boston
Bruins were trying their best to fight off the Flyers in the third
period of Game 7, having already given up a 3-0 lead and were close to
finishing off a monumental collapse.

Then, the team was caught
with too many men on the ice and the Flyers scored to go-ahead goal on
the ensuing power play. The first thing I thought of was the too many
men the San Jose Sharks weren’t caught with against the Red Wings
(although that was far from a deciding factor), then my next thought was
this had better not be a ticky tack call.

Was it legitimate? A
mix up involving Marc Savard and the bench led to too many men involved
in the play. There were two centers out on the ice, something a number
of the Bruins players noticed immediately.
Chad Finn of the Bruins Blog
passes along these explanations from
the Bruins:

“We had a player [Savard] with his stick
up like he wanted to make a
change, then he changed his mind,” coach Claude Julien explained. “So we
had the next center [Sobotka] jumping on”

“I saw two centermen out there, and I was like, ‘What’s going on?’ “”
Lucic said of the penalty, which happened at the 8:50 mark of the final
period. “Obviously something happened, there was a miscommunication and
we had to get off before we got caught. We got caught.”

According to the Bruins, Savard skated over for a change but didn’t
see anyone coming on so he stayed on the ice. The Bruins weren’t able to
cover up the gaffe quick enough and were caught. It certainly seems as
though a legitimate call was made, especially when this wasn’t just an
instance of a lazy change resulting in too many men actually out on the
ice. This was a mistake by the bench.

Apparently, Mark Recchi and Shawn Thornton didn’t agree with the
call, but when the coach isn’t making a stink about it generally that
means a good call was made.

“Well, I want to play a couple more years in this league so I don’t
want to bad mouth [the officials] too much,” Thornton said. “I do think
. . . I had a pretty good seat for the third period, and I was close to
where the guy was changing and I think it was very, very, very gutsy
call with seven minutes left with all of the other [expletive] that’s
going on out there.”

Of course, this loss can hardly be pinned on the penalty or the
ensuing goal. This loss was about the Bruins failing to keep the
pressure on after grabbing a big, this was about the Bruins once again
lacking the killer instinct needed to win four straight elimination
games.

Crosby: Penguins ‘probably deserved better’ vs. Senators in Game 6

Leave a comment

If you didn’t know that the Stanley Cup Playoffs can be awfully cruel, then the last week or so of action should make it pretty clear.

The Nashville Predators lost top center Ryan Johansen to a scary ailment few would have seen coming. The Anaheim Ducks fell in both games to the Johansen-less Predators, even after dominating significant chunks of Game 6. At least one Ducks player wondered if the better team won.

Much like in life, “fair” and “deserve” only matter so much. Sports have a scoreboard to serve as the ultimate deciding factor.

The Pittsburgh Penguins have similar thoughts after falling 2-1 to the Ottawa Senators tonight, extending the Eastern Conference Final to a decisive Game 7. You can nitpick questionable penalties and missed chances, but really, how negative can you be after Craig Anderson puts forth a blazing 45-save performance (with no overtime)?

Mike Sullivan and others echoed such thoughts.

” … Obviously, we’re disappointed in the result, but I don’t think we can get discouraged by that,” Sullivan said. “I think we’ve got to take the positives from it, and we’ve got to build on it, and we’ve got to become a more determined team for Game 7.

That’s not the sort of take that’s going to make the Senators angry in Game 7. The tone of the Senators’ discussions was likely very different after they lost Game 5 by a 7-0 score, yet maybe there was similar self belief.

Anderson puzzles Penguins as Senators force Game 7

8 Comments

Who could blame fans for chanting “Andy” tonight?

The Ottawa Senators said they would choose to fight in Game 6, and Craig Anderson truly battled in this one, refusing to allow this unlikely run to an end on Tuesday. They wouldn’t roll over, even after a 7-0 humiliation in Game 5.

The underrated goalie continued his memorable (and emotional) 2016-17 season with a brilliant performance, making 45 saves to help Ottawa manage a gutsy 2-1 win against the Pittsburgh Penguins.

With that, hockey fans get a true treat: the Eastern Conference will go to a Game 7 on Thursday.

The Senators opted for a “bend but don’t break” strategy for much of the contest, possibly to Guy Boucher’s preference. Even so, the Penguins managed to grind their way to a 1-0 win thanks to another hard-work goal from Evgeni Malkin.

Mistakes would come back to haunt the Penguins, however, as Bobby Ryan broke Ottawa’s lengthy power-play drought to tie things up on a 5-on-3.

With their season in question thanks to a 1-1 tie in the third period, Mike Hoffman sent a booming shot by Matt Murray, and that ended up being all the Senators needed to tie the series 3-3.

Anderson was the standout, but Erik Karlsson was a hero in the way his detractors might not expect.

You can watch Game 7 on NBCSN at 8 p.m. ET on Thursday. The game is also available to stream via the NBC Sports App.

Report: Avalanche get permission to speak with Leafs assistant GM Dubas

Getty
1 Comment

Could one of the most hapless possession teams of this more analytics-leaning era nab arguably the most promising analytics-leaning executive in the NHL?

It’s a reasonable question, as Sportsnet’s Elliotte Friedman reports that the Colorado Avalanche asked for and received permission to speak to Toronto Maple Leafs assistant GM Kyle Dubas.

Current GM Joe Sakic recently got a vote of confidence and also cleaned out some of the coaching staff around Jared Bednar, so this is certainly a time of change for the Avalanche.

It will be interesting to see what kind of role Dubas would receive if he did join the fold in Colorado. Would he still be considered an assistant GM, only with more sway with what would likely be a smaller group of decision-makers? Could we see Sakic move up and give Dubas the full GM title (or eventually transition that role to the young upstart)? Might there be some other factor that would qualify as a more “outside the box” idea?

One thing seems clear: the Avalanche might want to be decisive, as demand could be significant for Dubas if he’s even somewhat on the market.

This could be interesting, especially if you’re a nerd for team-building storylines.

Video: Senators score twice to take 2-1 lead in Game 6

5 Comments

The Ottawa Senators have defied odds during the Stanley Cup Playoffs, and they’ve done so with what’s often been an ice-cold power play.

They finally struck gold on the man advantage on Tuesday, and at a key moment. The Pittsburgh Penguins were dominating much of the game and pressing for an even bigger edge after Evgeni Malkin made it 1-0.

Maybe the Penguins got overzealous, or maybe officials … finally started making some calls. Either way, the Senators ended up with a 5-on-3 advantage for almost a minute-and-a-half. With that opportunity, Bobby Ryan scored a huge goal for Ottawa on a shot that was both oddly and perfectly placed.

Moments later, Kyle Turris narrowly missed a golden opportunity, so the contest remained tied 1-1.

Despite a late push by the Penguins to finish the second, Game 6 will enter the third period with a 1-1 score.

CLICK HERE TO WATCH LIVE COVERAGE FOR GAME 6

Update: Mike Hoffman‘s booming shot gave the Senators a 2-1 lead in the third. We’ll see if Pittsburgh can tie it up.