David Staples of the Edmonton Journal
has a great post up this morning, on how the little moves made by
GM Bob Gainey have certainly paid off this postseason. While many teams
went after the big name acquisitions (and only Dany Heatley’s trade has
truly paid off for the Sharks), the Canadiens decided to instead go for
role players, hard working forwards that have made a big difference for
the Habs in the postseason.
He also breaks down what happened with
the Penguins, saying this wasn’t just about Crosby and Malkin not
having a good series:
* Some folks may suggest Sidney
Crosby choked, or that Evgeni Malkin
did. While neither had his best game, Crosby did help manufacture one
Pittsburgh goal with tough play in front of the net. The real goat on
the Pens was Marc-Andre Fleury, who has a great reputation but lets in
far too many soft goals in big games for my liking. Yes, he had a strong
enough series against Detroit last year, but that came after stinking
it out the year before.
While Crosby and Malkin were
certainly outplayed by the Habs’ dynamic duo of Brian Gionta and Mike
Cammalleri (that’s a sentence I never thought I’d write), you can’t put
all the blame squarely on their shoulders.
In their biggest game
of the season, Fleury was downright horrible; inexcusable when compared
to what was happening on the other end of the ice. No matter what his
overall playoffs record may indicate, Fleury has had just one truly
memorable performance in the postseason. Even then, he was marred by
soft goals and despite what some claim he’s yet to prove himself an
elite goaltender in the playoffs.
What has to be most concerning
for the Penguins is what has happened on the blue line and along the
wing. The Penguins received nearly zero production from their secondary
scorers and while this team is known for it’s depth at center it’s the
lack of depth along the wing that was the ultimate kick in the teeth.
Penguins are a team that has been built on star power, much like the
Capitals, but it was an overall team effort by a number of role players
that ultimately made the difference for the Canadiens.
Dubinsky won’t change, and he won’t go easy on Crosby
“Nope,” Dubinsky said. “You know, I’ve played the same way my whole career and I’m not going to change. The next time I have an opportunity to play (Crosby), I’m going to play him hard.”
In case you’re wondering, that next opportunity comes on Dec. 21 in Pittsburgh, assuming that both players are healthy and not suspended.
One can understand Dubinsky’s perspective, although such honesty would be that much more interesting if there’s another incident with Crosby. His initial reaction to the hit was interestingly candid, admitting that his “stick rode up” on his adversary.
Would that stance – which, from a harsher view, might seem flippant to Dubinsky’s critics – open the door for a bigger future bit of a discipline?
Maybe, maybe not … but at least his comments aren’t as inflammatory as what John Tortorella said (at least on the record).
Bad news for Boedker: Coyotes won’t face Sens again in 2015-16