The debate over head hits continues

1 Comment

Booth3.jpgI don’t think the great David Simon could create drama quite like
this.

On Thursday night the NHL and the NHLPA agree to institute a
new ‘rule’ that gives the league the ability to actually punish for
blind-sided hits to the head. The consensus was that this is at least a
move in the right direction for the NHL, but there’s still concern over a
number of other dangerous hits plaguing the NHL.

Such as the one
that sent David Booth to the hospital for the second time in five
months, on the exact same night the NHL put the new rule into effect. If
you haven’t seen it (here’s the video) Booth gets rocked by Jaroslav
Spacek as he entered the zone, as Spacek catches Booth looking down and
slams him square in the chest. His shoulder also hit Booth squarely in
the chin, knocking him out and to the ice. Again.

The hit was
completely legal. There’s not even any debate about it.

Except now
we have cries of “It’s not enough!” In the wake of last night’s
devastating hit, now we get to talk about the merits of making any and
all hits to the head illegal.

From
Damien Cox of The Star
:

But when bright young stars like Booth are being injured on these
types of hits, is it really worth keeping those hits in the game?

Moreover, given that blindside and so-called “lateral” hits are now
suspendable offences and by next season will earn a player an on-ice
penalty as well, isn’t the next logical step to say you just cannot
bodycheck an opponent in the head under any circumstances because the
danger is just too real given the size and strength of the modern player
and the fragility of the brain?

And we have this from Spacek after the game, per TSN:

“I tried to step up at the blue-line, he was kind of low and when he
turned, I was right there,” said Spacek after the game. “I’m not a dirty
player. It just happened. It was body on body. It’s too bad. You never
want to see that.”

The issue is now over the whole “he should have kept his head down”
mantra that’s pervasive with these sort of hits. The NHL, the players,
and most everyone involved in the game insists that they cannot take
these big open-ice hits out of the game since it’s such a vital part of
the physicality of the game.

It’s possible for a hit like Spacek’s to be perfectly fine; if Booth
was ducking, then Spacek’s shoulder most likely catches him square in
the chest. So who is at fault? The player that doesn’t adjust his hit
not to lay into the opposing player’s head, or the player who is skating
with his head down, or ducks into a hit?

The NHL will never be able to make a determination on ‘purposeful
hits to the head’ from the front, as there’s no way to say whether
someone intended to lay shoulder into someone’s chin.

What about players that turn away from a check while on the boards,
causing themselves to put in a vulnerable position and then be boarded?
It happened twice last night in the San Jose and Dallas game. If all
hits to the head are illegal, will we suddenly see players ducking down
into hits? I know it sounds incredibly stupid, but I never would have
thought NHL players would purposefully expose their back to a big hit
along the boards either.

I don’t buy the thought that making all hits to the head illegal will
suddenly make the NHL a league without big hits. The IIHF somehow
manages to create fun and physical hockey with all head hits being
illegal.

Now that the blindsided hits are illegal, we’re not going to see
anymore of those. Instead, we’ll get a slew of clean, open ice hits from
the front.

And we can just debate all season long all over again.

Preds sign veteran d-man Matt Carle for one year

TORONTO, ON - DECEMBER 15:  Matthew Carle #25 of the Tampa Bay Lightning stretches in the warm-up prior to playing against the Toronto Maple Leafs during an NHL game at the Air Canada Centre on December 15, 2015 in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. The Lightning defeated the Leafs 5-4 in overtime. (Photo by Claus Andersen/Getty Images)
Leave a comment

Bought out by the Tampa Bay Lightning, defenseman Matt Carle has landed in Nashville on a one-year deal worth $700,000.

The Predators announced the signing today. Carle, 31, will join what’s considered one of the best blue lines in the NHL, led by P.K. Subban and Roman Josi.

Carle played 64 games for the Lightning last season, plus 14 more in the playoffs. But his ice time fell dramatically, to the point he logged under 10 minutes in each of the Bolts’ final three postseason games.

In Nashville, Carle will bring over 700 games of NHL experience, plus two trips to the Stanley Cup Final, to a team that just traded its captain, Shea Weber, and also bought out veteran defenseman Barret Jackman.

In fact, of the eight Preds d-men under contract, only Carle is over 30. The next oldest is Subban, who’s 27.

Canucks president doesn’t rule out acquiring a player with Evander Kane’s type of history

BUFFALO, NY - MARCH 01: Evander Kane #9 of the Buffalo Sabres warms up to play the Edmonton Oilers at First Niagara Center on March 1, 2016 in Buffalo, New York.  (Photo by Jen Fuller/Getty Images)
Getty
Leave a comment

Trevor Linden didn’t mention Evander Kane by name, because, well, you know…

But yesterday on the radio, the Vancouver Canucks’ president of hockey operations sure didn’t close the door on acquiring a player with Kane’s type of history.

You can listen to the audio of Linden’s interview with TSN 1040 here. (The Kane discussion starts at around the 3:10 mark.)

The main takeaway is that Linden refused to say that a player with a history of getting into trouble with the police would absolutely not be welcome on the Canucks.

“I think with any situation, they’re all unique to themselves,” Linden said, before warning against the temptation to jump to conclusions prior to knowing all the facts.

“Ultimately we’d prefer not to have that situation arise, certainly with our own players,” he added. “It’s a big world out there. Obviously, the challenges are significant for young guys who make a lot of money and get themselves into spots that they make mistakes.”

The Kane speculation has been kicked into overdrive in Vancouver (where Kane was born and raised and played his junior hockey), despite the absence of any hard evidence that the Canucks are talking seriously with Buffalo about a deal.

It’s been reported that the Sabres’ ability to sign Jimmy Vesey could impact their willingness to trade Kane. Vesey can’t make his decision until Aug. 15, so perhaps we’ll have to wait until then.

But according to Canucks beat writer Jason Botchford (The Province), Kane is definitely on Vancouver’s radar.

“There’s no doubt about it, the Vancouver Canucks are going to be in on Evander Kane,” Botchford told TSN 1040 radio. “Ownership loves Kane. Jim Benning really likes Kane. Trevor? He’s maybe a little bit ambivalent, but he could be won over. They’re going to be in on Evander Kane.”

Related: Canucks made Jets ‘fair offer’ for Kane

Preds sign Jarnkrok for six years, with a cap hit of just $2 million

DENVER, CO - DECEMBER 09:  Calle Jarnkrok #19 of the Nashville Predators skates against the Colorado Avalanche at Pepsi Center on December 9, 2014 in Denver, Colorado. The Predators defeated the Avalanche 3-0.  (Photo by Doug Pensinger/Getty Images)
Getty
11 Comments

Nashville’s momentous offseason continued today with the signing of forward Calle Jarnkrok to a six-year, $12 million contract.

That’s a cap hit of just $2 million, all the way through 2021-22.

Suffice to say, it’s not often that a player signs such a long deal, for such a modest cap hit. Jarnkrok notched career highs in goals (16) and assists (14) in 81 games last season for the Preds. He kills penalties, too.

At the very least, the 24-year-old has some financial security now. But for Nashville, as long as his production doesn’t fall off a cliff, he could end up being a great bargain.

Jarnkrok had an arbitration hearing scheduled for Aug. 4.

Related: Preds avoid arbitration with Petter Granberg — two years, $1.225 million

Red Wings re-sign Mrazek to two-year, $8 million deal

Detroit Red Wings goalie Petr Mrazek (34) stops a shot by Tampa Bay Lightning center Valtteri Filppula (51) in the first period of Game 3 in a first-round NHL hockey Stanley Cup playoff series, Sunday, April 17, 2016, in Detroit. (AP Photo/Paul Sancya)
AP
5 Comments

The Detroit Red Wings didn’t need Petr Mrazek‘s arbitration hearing either.

The day after the Wings avoided the process by locking up defenseman Danny DeKeyser, they agreed on a two-year deal with Mrazek, with a reported cap hit of $4 million.

Mrazek, 24, went 27-16-6 last season with a .921 save percentage. Those numbers compared favorably to Jimmy Howard‘s (14-14-5, .906); however, GM Ken Holland has argued that keeping Howard could be best for Mrazek’s development.

“It could possibly be detrimental if we put Petr in a situation where we’re just going to throw him out and play 70 games and no matter how you play, we’re going to keep putting you out,” said Holland.

Granted, it may be that Howard is simply untradeable. He’s 32 years old, hasn’t put up solid numbers the past three seasons, and has three years remaining on his contract with a cap hit of just under $5.3 million.

If Howard remains, the Wings will have just under $9.3 million in cap space allocated to their goaltenders next season, one of the highest totals in the league.

Mrazek, by the way, will still be a restricted free agent when his new contract expires in the summer of 2018.