The debate over head hits continues

1 Comment

Booth3.jpgI don’t think the great David Simon could create drama quite like

On Thursday night the NHL and the NHLPA agree to institute a
new ‘rule’ that gives the league the ability to actually punish for
blind-sided hits to the head. The consensus was that this is at least a
move in the right direction for the NHL, but there’s still concern over a
number of other dangerous hits plaguing the NHL.

Such as the one
that sent David Booth to the hospital for the second time in five
months, on the exact same night the NHL put the new rule into effect. If
you haven’t seen it (here’s the video) Booth gets rocked by Jaroslav
Spacek as he entered the zone, as Spacek catches Booth looking down and
slams him square in the chest. His shoulder also hit Booth squarely in
the chin, knocking him out and to the ice. Again.

The hit was
completely legal. There’s not even any debate about it.

Except now
we have cries of “It’s not enough!” In the wake of last night’s
devastating hit, now we get to talk about the merits of making any and
all hits to the head illegal.

Damien Cox of The Star

But when bright young stars like Booth are being injured on these
types of hits, is it really worth keeping those hits in the game?

Moreover, given that blindside and so-called “lateral” hits are now
suspendable offences and by next season will earn a player an on-ice
penalty as well, isn’t the next logical step to say you just cannot
bodycheck an opponent in the head under any circumstances because the
danger is just too real given the size and strength of the modern player
and the fragility of the brain?

And we have this from Spacek after the game, per TSN:

“I tried to step up at the blue-line, he was kind of low and when he
turned, I was right there,” said Spacek after the game. “I’m not a dirty
player. It just happened. It was body on body. It’s too bad. You never
want to see that.”

The issue is now over the whole “he should have kept his head down”
mantra that’s pervasive with these sort of hits. The NHL, the players,
and most everyone involved in the game insists that they cannot take
these big open-ice hits out of the game since it’s such a vital part of
the physicality of the game.

It’s possible for a hit like Spacek’s to be perfectly fine; if Booth
was ducking, then Spacek’s shoulder most likely catches him square in
the chest. So who is at fault? The player that doesn’t adjust his hit
not to lay into the opposing player’s head, or the player who is skating
with his head down, or ducks into a hit?

The NHL will never be able to make a determination on ‘purposeful
hits to the head’ from the front, as there’s no way to say whether
someone intended to lay shoulder into someone’s chin.

What about players that turn away from a check while on the boards,
causing themselves to put in a vulnerable position and then be boarded?
It happened twice last night in the San Jose and Dallas game. If all
hits to the head are illegal, will we suddenly see players ducking down
into hits? I know it sounds incredibly stupid, but I never would have
thought NHL players would purposefully expose their back to a big hit
along the boards either.

I don’t buy the thought that making all hits to the head illegal will
suddenly make the NHL a league without big hits. The IIHF somehow
manages to create fun and physical hockey with all head hits being

Now that the blindsided hits are illegal, we’re not going to see
anymore of those. Instead, we’ll get a slew of clean, open ice hits from
the front.

And we can just debate all season long all over again.

WATCH LIVE: Wednesday Night Rivalry (Flyers-Islanders; Blackhawks-Sharks)

Ryan White, Matt Martin
Leave a comment

You can check out tonight’s Wednesday Night Rivalry doubleheader on NBCSN, and you can also stream them online.

Here are the handy links for the two contests.

First, the New York Islanders host the Philadelphia Flyers.


After that, the Chicago Blackhawks visit the San Jose Sharks.


Braun out with upper-body injury; Zubrus to make Sharks debut

1 Comment

The San Jose Sharks will be missing a top-4 defenseman tonight when they host the defending champs from Chicago.

Justin Braun has an upper-body injury. His status is considered day-to-day.

“Brauny has been one of our unsung heroes here through the first quarter of the season,” coach Peter DeBoer told CSN Bay Area. “He’s played some outstanding hockey. So, we’re going to miss him, but it’s a great opportunity for Mueller and Tennyson and one of these guys to establish themselves. It’s a great opportunity for us to reward Dillon for how well he’s played.”

Against the Blackhawks, Brenden Dillon will take Braun’s spot on the top pairing alongside Marc-Edouard Vlasic; Paul Martin and Brent Burns will stay together on the second pairing; and 20-year-old Mirco Mueller will skate with Matt Tennyson.

Mueller has played just four games for the Sharks this season. In his last game, Thursday in Philadelphia, he received only 9:13 of ice time.

Also tonight, new Shark forward Dainius Zubrus is expected to debut on the fourth line.

Related: Sharks sign Zubrus, because DeBoer

Johansen calls trade rumblings ‘weird,’ says relationship with Torts is ‘great’

Ryan Johansen
Leave a comment

One day after reports surfaced of Ryan Johansen being at the center of trade talks, all parties involved from Columbus did what they’re supposed to do — downplay the situation.

You can read the denials in full over at the Dispatch, but here’s the gist:

— Johansen said the rumors were “weird” and that he’s “never seen it before.” He also said there were no issues between him and head coach John Tortorella, calling the relationship “great.”

— GM Jarmo Kekalainen wouldn’t address the report, nor would Johansen’s agent, Kurt Overhardt.

— Johansen added he hasn’t spoken to any of Columbus’ management about the trade rumblings.

So there’s that. What’s next?

At this stage of the game, it’s hard not to think about another Overhardt client, Kyle Turris.

Turris, you’ll recall, spent four (mostly) stormy years with the Coyotes before his trade out to Ottawa was orchestrated. Turris eventually told GM Don Maloney “this is not going to work out” with the club, and he was gone.

So, consider the similarities now:

— Turris was 22 at the time of the trade, with four years and 137 games under his belt.

— Johansen is 23, with five years and 291 games.

— Both had contentious contract holdouts with their respective clubs.

— Both are Overhardt guys.

— The Turris trade happened after the Coyotes went from Wayne Gretzky to Dave Tippett as head coach.

— Johansen is already on his third head coach (Scott Arniel, Todd Richards, Tortorella).

For now, these are all coincidences (or a forced narrative, depending what you think of the author).

And, of course, the one big — big — difference between the two is that, at the time of his trade, Turris wasn’t as good or established a player as Johansen currently is. Therefore, logic suggests any Johansen trade would be a lot more blockbuster-y and, therefore, probably more complex.

And as we know, complex deals aren’t easy to pull off.

Flyers’ Gagner to miss another week after Malone hit

Leave a comment

The nasty blow Sam Gagner took in Monday’s game against Carolina will keep him on the shelf for a little bit.

On Wednesday, Flyers GM Ron Hextall said the club expected Gagner to be out around a week with injuries suffered on the hit, delivered by ‘Canes forward Brad Malone (per the Inquirer).

Gagner suffered a fairly significant facial laceration, which forced him from the game entirely. He didn’t practice on Tuesday and, in a corresponding move, the Flyers called up Colin McDonald from the AHL to fill Gagner’s spot on the roster.

This is the second facial injury Gagner’s suffered in recent years. He’d previously had his jaw broken by an errant Zack Kassian high stick, while he was with the Oilers and Kassian the Canucks.

Prior to getting hurt, Gagner had two goals and five points in 18 games, averaging just under 12 minutes per night.