Alex Ovechkin's hit is far from controversial

29 Comments

I don’t want to hear about any conspiracy.

I don’t want to listen to any talks about referee bias, or how the NHL has an agenda towards any team or player.

None of that factored into this situation. In fact, I think the big issue here is that the referee’s actually got the call right, something that we’re not used to seeing lately.

Alex Ovechkin committed a careless transgression, pushing Brian Campbell from behind and head-first into the boards. It wasn’t dirty, it wasn’t intentional but according to the rule book the NHL currently has in place it warranted a major penalty. And when it comes to the rule book, a major when it comes to boarding is an automatic game misconduct. According to Rule 42:

42.3 Major Penalty – The Referee, at his discretion, may assess a major penalty, based on the degree of violence of the impact with the boards, to a player or goalkeeper guilty of boarding an opponent (see 42.5).

42.4 Match Penalty – The Referee, at his discretion, may assess a match penalty if, in his judgment, the player or goalkeeper attempted to or deliberately injured his opponent by boarding.

42.5 Game Misconduct Penalty – When a major penalty is imposed under this rule for a foul resulting in an injury to the face or head of an opponent, a game misconduct shall be imposed.

No comparing this hit or penalty to the Matt Cooke hit. As dumb as it is, the NHL does not have a rule in place that says what Cooke did is illegal. Ovechkin’s hit? Well, it’s spelled out right above me that Ovechkin’s hit was illegal and it was punished as such. Brian Campbell was injured and knocked out of the game, which made Ovechkin’s hit ramp up a bit on the severity scale. And when a major is assessed, it’s an automatic suspension.

There is no debate here. None.

Ovechkin will also be suspended for this hit. He faces an automatic one-game suspension since this is his third game misconduct of the season, and he most likely will get more. Maxim Lapierre was suspended four games but his hit was worse — his arms were extended and it was a much more violent push. So you have the automatic one-game suspension and perhaps more, but considering the hit wasn’t necessarily violent — or clearly intentional — then perhaps the NHL just leaves it at that.

[Update] Puck Daddy points us to a loophole in the rule books, in which after 41 games have passes without a boarding penalty since the last misconduct, then the previous misconduct shall be wiped from the record. This past game was No. 42.

I also don’t want to hear an argument about how it was a hit (or push) from the side. Here’s the evidence that it clearly was a push from behind.[End Update]

Now, there’s some other issues to cover in regards to this hit. Here’s video of NBC’s Mike Milbury and Pierre McGuire debating whether the NHL is “becoming soft”.

 

I don’t see how making stricter rules to protect the safety of the players on the ice means the NHL is becoming soft. We’ve gone over this numerous times before, but the game of hockey is constantly evolving. The rules that were in place and worked for so long are not as applicable as the once were, and there needs to be better legislation in place that standardizes hits and subsequent punishment.

I understand the sentiment that we don’t want hockey to become any less physical, but for anyone that watched the Olympics it’s obvious that hockey can be entertaining and physical when ALL head shots are illegal.

What I don’t get is how this hit had absolutely nothing to do with head shots, and is a clear cut case of boarding. Was it a dirty play? Not at all, it was just careless.

Ovechkin will be punished according the rules that are in place. Do we need better rules in place for the number of other dangerous hits that are sidelining players around the league? Of course we do, and at least the NHL is trying to do something about it. It may be too little, too late but there’s change on the way.

But all that has no bearing on this hit. No conspiracy, no controversial rules. Just a boarding penalty that resulted in an injury, a game misconduct and what should be a suspension.

Now if the NHL doesn’t hand down an appropriate suspension? Then we can start talking about that conspiracy…

Lightning, Islanders make East playoff races even more confusing

NEW YORK, NY - NOVEMBER 01: Ben Bishop #30 of the Tampa Bay Lightning makes the third period save as Ryan Strome #18 of the New York Islanders looks for a rebound at the Barclays Center on November 1, 2016 in the Brooklyn borough of New York City.  (Photo by Bruce Bennett/Getty Images)
Getty
1 Comment

Whenever you groan at what seems like a quiet trade market, take a step back and ask yourself this: “Who is really out of it?”

For a while there, it felt reasonable to dismiss the chances of teams like the Florida Panthers, New York Islanders and Tampa Bay Lightning. Now? There’s probably only a handful of teams that can really be comfortable, at this very point, with calling themselves sellers.

The Islanders took care of their business with a 3-1 win against the fading (probably selling?) Detroit Red Wings, even with Petr Mrazek making a save like this.

Meanwhile, Ben Bishop might just be putting his game together (while Nikita Kucherov‘s game remains very much together) as the Tampa Bay Lightning throttled the Edmonton Oilers 4-1. Bishop might just end up being indispensable – or at least not worth trading – as he’s on a five-game winning streak.

With those wins, the races for the last seemingly available Eastern Conference playoff spots just get that much muddier.*

Third place in the Atlantic: Maple Leafs – 67 points in 59 games, 28 wins, 27 ROW

Second wild card: Panthers – 66 points in 58 GP, 28 W, 25 ROW

Bruins – 66 points in 59 GP, 30 W, 28 ROW
Islanders – 66 points in 59 GP, 28 W, 27 ROW
Flyers – 63 points in 59 GP, 28 W, 23 ROW
Lightning – 62 points in 59 GP, 27 W, 25 ROW
Sabres – 62 points in 60 GP, 26 W, 25 ROW

Wow, that’s crazy-close. Naturally, teams like the Islanders and Flyers lack the luxury of having a third spot in reasonable reach – unless things get truly wild – but that’s quite the congested group of playoff hopefuls.

And, sure, the Bolts are among those facing longer odds, but the way things keep swinging wildly this season, who knows? Especially with a team with a track record of success and high expectations like the Lightning.

* – We’ll arbitrarily cut off the East race at the Devils, but just in case you’re wondering, they have 60 points, the Red Wings have 58 and the Hurricanes have 56. Also, the Ottawa Senators hold the second spot in the Atlantic with 70 points and the Montreal Canadiens lead the division with 72, so that group could see quite a bit of movement over the last quarter of the season.

Forsberg’s hat trick, own-goal highlights Predators’ wild OT loss to Flames

4 Comments

If you want to summarize the kind of night the Nashville Predators experienced, you could do worse than to draw parallels to Filip Forsberg‘s experiences.

The highs were quite high, you see. Forsberg & Co. carved away at the Calgary Flames’ 4-1 lead as his hat trick (see above) eventually gave the Predators a fleeting 5-4 edge.

We all should have seen more drama coming … and it did. Forsberg ended up being at the wrong place at the wrong time in overtime; the Flames’ 6-5 overtime winner ended up going off of his foot. Ouch.

Mark Giordano ended up being credited with that goal. The game was just a barn-burner.

While it was an up-and-down night for both the Flames and Predators, Pekka Rinne‘s evening was pretty much uniformly dismal.

Rinne was pulled early in the second period after giving up four goals on 13 shots, making way for Juuse Saros (who actually ended up gtting tagged with the loss).

The Flames can breathe a sigh of relief after winning the game despite coughing up a big lead, improving to 64 points and strengthening their grip on the second wild card spot. That “charity point” comes in handy for Nashville, leaving the Predators with 65 points and a game in hand on the Flames.

Serious performance: Blackhawks gain on Wild thanks to Toews’ five points

7 Comments

If the Chicago Blackhawks are going to make up some serious ground and overtake the Minnesota Wild for the Central Division title, they’ll need wins like these.

It’s only fitting that “Captain Serious” Jonathan Toews did the heavy lifting, generating a hat trick and two assists as the Blackhawks beat the Wild 5-3 on Tuesday.

Yes, Toews was involved in every goal. And yes, the Blackhawks won this one in regulation after beating the Wild in overtime last time around. It’s a nice swing for Chicago:

Central Division title chase

1. Wild – 84 points in 59 games (39 wins, 36 ROW)
2. Blackhawks – 79 points in 60 games (37 wins, 35 ROW)

Yeah, that’s still a substantial edge for Minnesota … but this is a significant swing.

Even beyond the name recognition that comes with Toews & Co., the Blackhawks’ push shouldn’t be surprising. They’re red-hot in February so far, going 7-1-0 despite playing seven of eight on the road (strangely losing that lone home contest).

The Wild have played reasonably well in their own right, yet this loss sends them into a bye week with some frustration … and maybe some questions about whether they can hold the Blackhawks off.

Also, tonight marked a nice milestone for Joel Quenneville:

Matthews, Leafs get last laugh in OT vs. Laine and the Jets

1 Comment

Hockey fans tend to get their radars up about over-hyping things, particularly promising rookies.

Is it hasty, then, to wonder if there’s something to a rivalry between Auston Matthews (and the Maple Leafs) vs. Patrik Laine (plus the Jets)? If nothing else, the two have come up big in two very exciting games.

Back in October, Laine generated a hat trick as the Jets beat the Maple Leafs 5-4 in overtime. This time around, it was another 5-4 overtime decision … only Matthews and the Maple Leafs took this round.

This isn’t to take anything away from Laine’s performance, mind you. He scored two goals on Tuesday, becoming the rare modern rookie to muster 30 goals. He reminded hockey fans that he only needs the smallest window to make you pay with his deadly, world-class shot.

MORE on that goal and the violence that ensued here.

But Matthews wouldn’t be denied, either, and fittingly did so in a quieter fashion. (Virtually everyone seems a little quieter when Laine’s around, it seems.)

The Maple Leafs’ outstanding rookie managed three assists in this game, giving him 52 points in 59 games. He also has six points in a three-game run and eight in his past five.

Laine? He now has 54 points in 55 games, extending is own point streak to five games (seven goals, three assists).

In other words, it’s really close … just like the games when these two budding stars (and their young, promising teammates) meet.

You might even be tempted to believe the hype.